Co-designing reform-based online inquiry learning environments as a situated approach to teachers’ professional development

References

• Akerson, V. L., T. A. Cullen, and D. L. Hanson. 2009. “Fostering a Community of Practice through a Professional Development Program to Improve Elementary Teachers’ Views of Nature of Science and Teaching Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (10): 1090–1113. doi:10.1002/tea.20303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avalos, B. 2011. “Teacher Professional Development in Teaching and Teacher Education over Ten Years.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (1): 10–20. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A. 2006. “Methodological Toolkit for the Learning Scientist.” In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, edited by R. K. Sawyer, 151–170. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116.10.1162/DESI_a_00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borko, H., J. Jacobs, and K. Koellner. 2010. “Contemporary Approaches to Teacher Professional Development.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by B. Eva and M. Barry, 3rd ed. 548–556. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., J. A. Whitcomb, and K. Byrnes 2008. Genres of Research in Teacher Education. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, edited by M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, and A. E. Kelly E. Demers, 3rd ed. 1017–1049. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boschman, F., S. McKenney, and J. Voogt. 2014. “Understanding Decision Making in Teachers’ Curriculum Design Approaches.” Educational Technology Research and Development 62 (4): 393–416. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9341-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. 1992. “Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 2: 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, I. 1999. “Professionalism and Teachers as Designers.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (1): 43–56.10.1080/002202799183287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., and M. B. Rosson. 2007. “Participatory Design in Community Informatics.” Design Studies 28 (3): 243–261.10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., and H. Hollingsworth. 2002. “Elaborating a Model of Teacher Professional Growth.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (8): 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, K., M. Simkins, and W. R. Penuel. 2002. “Learning to Teach with Technology: Strategies for Inservice Professional Development.” Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 10 (3): 431–455.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. S. 2003. “‘Change is Hard’: What Science Teachers are Telling us about Reform and Teacher Learning of Innovative Practices.” Science Education 87 (1): 3–30.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deketelaere, A., and G. Kelchtermans. 1996. “Collaborative Curriculum Development: An Encounter of Different Professional Knowledge Systems.” Teachers and Teaching 2 (1): 71–85. doi:10.1080/1354060960020106.
   Google Scholar
• Dolonen, J., and S. Ludvigsen. 2013. “Analysing Design Suggestions and Use of Resources in Co-design of Educational Software: A Case Study.” CoDesign 9 (4): 247–265. doi:10.1080/15710882.2013.853086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., J. A. Meirink, K. van Veen, and R. C. Zwart. 2012. “Current Trends and Missing Links in Studies on Teacher Professional Development in Science Education: A Review of Design Features and Quality of Research.” Studies in Science Education 48 (2): 129–160. doi:10.1080/03057267.2012.738020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druin, A. 2002. “The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology.” Behaviour & Information Technology 21 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/01449290110108659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. 2002. “Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 11: 105–121. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorozidis, G., and A. G. Papaioannou. 2014. “Teachers’ Motivation to Participate in Training and to Implement Innovations.” Teaching and Teacher Education 39: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga, T., A. Handelzalts, N. Nieveen, and J. M. Voogt. 2014. “Teacher Involvement in Curriculum Design: Need for Support to Enhance Teachers’ Design Expertise.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 46 (1): 33–57.10.1080/00220272.2013.834077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. L. 2009. Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Jenlink, P. M., and K. Kinnucan-Welsch. 2001. “Case Stories of Facilitating Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (6): 705–724. doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00025-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kali, Y., P. Goodyear, and L. Markauskaite. 2011. “Researching Design Practices and Design Cognition: Contexts, Experiences and Pedagogical Knowledge-in-pieces.” Learning, Media and Technology 36 (2): 129–149. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.553621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiorgi, Y., and L. Symeou. 2006. “Teacher Professional Development in Cyprus: Reflections on Current Trends and Challenges in Policy and Practices.” Journal of in-Service Education 32 (1): 47–61.10.1080/13674580500479968
   Google Scholar
• Karagiorgi, Y., and L. Symeou. 2007. “Teachers’ in-service Training Needs in Cyprus.” European Journal of Teacher Education 30 (2): 175–194.10.1080/02619760701275487
   Google Scholar
• Kensing, F., and J. Blomberg. 1998. “Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 7 (3–4): 167–185. doi:10.1023/a:1008689307411.
   Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., and L. A. Bryan. 2001. “Co-constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (6): 631–645. doi:10.1002/tea.1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., and D. MacDonald. 2001. “Teacher Voice and Ownership of Curriculum Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 33 (5): 551–567.10.1080/00220270010016874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyza, E. A., and C. P. Constantinou 2007. STOCHASMOS: A Web-based Platform for Reflective, Inquiry-based Teaching and Learning [Software]. Cyprus: Learning in Science Group. http://www.stochasmos.org, http://www.coreflect.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kyza, E. A., and Y. Georgiou. 2014. “Developing in-service Science Teachers’ Ownership of the PROFILES Pedagogical Framework through a Technology-supported Participatory Design Approach to Professional Development.” Science Education International 25 (2): 55–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., and J. W. Pellegrino. 2007. “Professional Development in Integrating Technology into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 575–614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. 2008. “Design Participation Tactics: The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-design Process.” CoDesign 4 (1): 31–50.10.1080/15710880701875613
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., K. E. Stiles, S. Mundry, N. Love, and P. W. Hewson. 2010. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W. 2008. “Science Curriculum Materials that Support Student Learning: New Research That Addresses Continuing Challenges.” The Elementary School Journal 109 (2): 99–103. doi:10.1086/590520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaidou, I., E. A. Kyza, F. Terzian, A. Hadjichambis, and D. Kafouris. 2011. “A Framework for Scaffolding Students’ Assessment of the Credibility of Evidence.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (7): 711–744. doi:10.1002/tea.20420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. “Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections.” Vol. 13. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Parke, H. M., and C. R. Coble. 1997. “Teachers Designing Curriculum as Professional Development: A Model for Transformational Science Teaching.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (8): 773–789. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199710)34:8<773:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., J. M. Roschelle, and N. Shechtman. 2007. “Designing Formative Assessment Software with Teachers: An Analysis of the Co-design Process.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 2 (1): 51–74. doi:10.1142/S1793206807000300.
   Google Scholar
• Polly, D. 2011. “Teachers’ Learning While Constructing Technology-based Instructional Resources.” British Journal of Educational Technology 42 (6): 950–961. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., and H. Borko. 2000. “What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say about Research on Teacher Learning?” Educational Researcher 29 (1): 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, B. J., J. P. Spillane, F. Steinmuller, D. Sorsa, K. Carney, and E. A. Kyza. 2000. “Investigating the Mutual Adaptation Process in Teachers’ Design of Technology-Infused Curricula.” In Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, edited by B. Fishman and S. O’Connor-Divelbiss, 342–349. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F., R. Vollmeyer, and S. Engeser. 2003. “Die Erfassung Des Flow-Erlebens [The assessment of flow].” In Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept [Diagnosis of motivation and self-concept], edited by J. Stiensmeier-Pester and F. Rheinberg, 261–279. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberg, F., R. Vollmeyer, and W. Rollett. 2000. “Motivation and Action in Self-regulated Learning.” In Handbook of Self-regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 503–529. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T., and J. Simonsen. 2012. “Participatory Design: An Introduction.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 1–18. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. P. 2011. “Implementing a Science-based Interdisciplinary Curriculum in the Second Grade: A Community of Practice in Action.” International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education 3 (2): 83–103.
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., W. R. Penuel, and N. Shechtman. 2006. “Co-Design of Innovations with Teachers: Definition and Dynamics.” In Proceedings Of the 7th International Conference on Learning Sciences, edited by S. Barab, K. Hay, and D. Hickey, 606–612. Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. 2010. Teachers’ Professional Development: Europe in International Comparison. http://doc.utwente.nl/92610/1/NC8010244ENC_002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Shawer, S. F. 2010. “Classroom-level Curriculum Development: EFL Teachers as Curriculum-developers, Curriculum-makers and Curriculum-transmitters.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (2): 173–184.10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., and S. Y. Han. 2004. “Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club.” Teaching and Teacher Education 20 (2): 163–183. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader, G., K. Williams, L. Walker, and L. Gomez. 1999. “Work in the ‘Work-circle’: A Description of Collaborative Design to Improve Teaching Practice.” Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. K., and B. J. Reiser. 1998. “National Geographic Unplugged: Classroom-centered Design of Interactive Nature Films.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. 1999. “External Reform Initiatives and Teachers’ Efforts to Reconstruct Their Practice: The Mediating Role of Teachers’ Zones of Enactment.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 31 (2): 143–175.10.1080/002202799183205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., M. Guzdial, and K. E. Hay. 1994. “Learner-centered Design: The Challenge for HCI in the 21st Century.” Interactions 1 (2): 36–48.10.1145/174809.174813
   Google Scholar
• Stolk, M., O. De Jong, A. W. Bulte, and A. Pilot. 2011. “Exploring a Framework for Professional Development in Curriculum Innovation: Empowering Teachers for Designing Context-based Chemistry Education.” Research in Science Education 41 (3): 369–388. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9170-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 2003. “Aktuelle Motivation und Motivation im Verlauf [Current Motivation and on-line Motivation].” In Diagnostik Von Motivation Und Selbstkonzept [Diagnosis of Motivation and Self-Concept], edited by J. Stiensmeier-Pester and F. Rheinberg, 281–295. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Vollmeyer, R., and F. Rheinberg. 2006. “Motivational Effects on Self-regulated Learning with Different Tasks.” Educational Psychology Review 18: 239–253. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9017-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., H. Westbroek, A. Handelzalts, A. Walraven, S. McKenney, J. Pieters, and B. de Vries. 2011. “Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (8): 1235–1244. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. M. Snyder. 2002. Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar