Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the public realm

References

• Ahrensbacj, Timothy, and Joost Buenderman. 2012. Compendium for the Civic Economy. Amsterdam: Trancity Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Ampatzidou, Cristina, Matthijs Bouw, Froukje van de Klundert, Michiel de Lange, and Martijn de Waal. 2015. The Hackable City: A Research Manifesto and Design Toolkit. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Creative Industries Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bannon, Liam J., and Pelle Ehn. 2012. “Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertsen, 37–63. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per Anders Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and ‘Democratizing Innovation’.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 41–50. New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900448.
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, Jeanette, Jean Giacomi, Andrea Mosher, and Pat Swenton-Wall. 1993. “Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design.” In Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, edited by Douglas Schuler and Aki Namioka, 123–156. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boudry, Linda, Peter Cabus, Eric Coryn, Filip De Rynck, Chris Kesteloot, and André Loeckx. 2003. De eeuw van de stad: over stadsrepublieken en rastersteden. Brussels: Project Stedenbeleid, Administratie Binnenlandse aangelegenheden.
   Google Scholar
• Castell, Pål. 2016. “Institutional Framing of Citizen Initiatives: A Challenge for Advancing Public Participation in Sweden.” International Planning Studies 21 (4): 305–316.10.1080/13563475.2015.1124756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopherson, Susan. 1994. “The Fortress City: Privatized Spaces, Consumer Citizenship.” In Post-Fordism: A Reader, edited by Ash Amin, 409–427. New York: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470712726
   Google Scholar
• Dindler, Cristian, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2014. “Relational Expertise in Participatory Design.” Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers—Volume 1, 41–50. New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2661435.2661452.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl, Andrew Clement, and Volkmar Pipek. 2012. “Participatory Design for, with, and by Communities.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertsen, 182–209. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Devos, Tim, Michael Kaethler, and Seppe De Blust. 2017. “Ambiguity as Agency: Critical Opportunists in the Neoliberal City.” CoDesign 13 (3): 175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Steven, and Simon Marvin. 1994. “More than Ducts and Wires: Post-Fordism, Cities and Utility Networks.” In Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, edited by Patsy Healey, Stuart Cameron, Simin Davoudi, Stephen Graham and Ali Madani-Pour, 169–189. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen, and Steven Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 725–740.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy, and Jocelyn Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policy-making.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226.
   Google Scholar
• Kyng, Morten. 2015. “On Creating and Sustaining Alternatives: The Case of Danish Telehealth.” Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1 (1): 12. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21297.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, Christopher, and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264.10.1177/0306312712471581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenskjold, Tau Ulv, Sissel Olander, and Joachim Halse. 2015. “Minor Design Activism: Prompting Change from within.” Design Issues 31 (4): 66–77. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511806414
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, Thomas. 2017. “Disentangling ‘The Social’ in Social Design’s Engagement with the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 160–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. “Institutions as Sites of Agonistic Intervention.” In Institutional Attitudes: Instituting Art in a Flat World, edited by Pascal Gielen, 63–77. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, Peter, and Staffan Schmidt. 2017. “Enabling Urban Commons.” CoDesign 13 (3): 202–213.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, Jacques. 2004. Aesthetics and Its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A., and Martin Rein. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, Anna, Mette Agger Eriksen, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2017. “Co-Design in Co-production Processes: Jointly Articulating and Appropriating Infrastructuring and Commoning with Civil Servants.” CoDesign 13 (3): 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, Maurizio. 2015. “Computing and the Common. Hints of a New Utopia in Participatory Design.” Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1 (1): 4. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318.
   Google Scholar