Co-designing with a community of older learners for over 10 years by moving user-driven participation from the margin to the centre

References

• Balka, E. 2010. “Broadening Discussion about Participatory Design: A Reply to Kyng.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22 (1): 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P. A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116.10.1162/DESI_a_00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 26 (1–2): 245–273.10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2010. “User Gains and PD Aims: Assessment from a Participatory Design Project.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 141–150. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., C. Dindler, O. S. Iversen. 2016. “Evaluation in Participatory Design: A Literature Survey.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference, 151–160. New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/2940299
   Google Scholar
• Botero, A., and S. Hyysalo. 2013. “Ageing Together: Steps towards Evolutionary Co-Design in Everyday Practices.” CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 9(1): 37–54.10.1080/15710882.2012.760608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., and I. Wagner. 2016. “What is a Participatory Design Result?” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference-Volume 1, 141–150. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. C., and X. Wang. 2012. “Design for Well-Being in China: Lessons Learned from Exploratory Workshops.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases-Volume 2, 81–84. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cozza, M., L. Tonolli, and V. D’Andrea. 2016. “Subversive Participatory Design: Reflections on a Case Study.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2, 53–56. New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/2948076
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., A. Clement, and V. Pipek. 2013. “Participatory Design for, with, and by Communities.” In International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 182–209. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, Y., S. Eriksén, and C. Hansson. 2002. “PD in the Wild; Evolving Practices of Design in Use.” In Proceedings of the 7th Biennal Participatory Design Conference, edited by T. Binder, J. Gregory, and I. Wagner, 124–134. Palo Alto, CA: CPSR.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and N. B. Hansen. 2015. “The Diversity of Participatory Design Research Practice at PDC 2002–2012.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74: 81–92.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. G., and T. Bratteteig. 2016. “Designing for Prolonged Mastery. On Involving Old People in Participatory Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 28 (1): 3–36.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., and L. J. Bannon. 2012. “Interaction Design Beyond the Product: Creating Technology-Enhanced Activity Spaces.” Human-Computer Interaction 27 (3): 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsgaard, H., C. N. Klokmose, and S. Bødker. 2016. “Computational Alternatives in Participatory Design: Putting the T Back in Socio-Technical Research.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference-Volume 1, 71–79. New York, NY: ACM.10.1145/2940299
   Google Scholar
• Leong, T. W., and T. Robertson. 2016. “Voicing Values: Laying Foundations for Ageing People to Participate in Design.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1, 31–40. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., D. Jackson, G. Schofield, and P. Olivier. 2012. “Engaging Older People Using Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1199–1208. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Millen, D. R. 2000. “Rapid Ethnography: Time Deepening Strategies for HCI Field Research.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, 280–286. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., and M. Nørgaard. 2011. “Using DIY Cartoon Storyboards, Live Sketching and Co-Sketching to Involve Young and Older Users in Participatory Design.” Design Research IASDR 2011: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. F. 2011. “Design and the Digital Divide: Insights from 40 Years in Computer Support for Older and Disabled People.” Synthesis Lectures on Assistive, Rehabilitative, and Health-Preserving Technologies 1 (1): 1–195.
   Google Scholar
• Otjacques, B., M. Krier, F. Feltz, D. Ferring, and M. Hoffmann. 2010. “Designing for Older People: A Case Study in a Retirement Home.” In HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure (USAB 2010), edited by G. Leitner, M. Hitz, and A. Holzinger. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6389, 177–194. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pipek, V., and V. Wulf. 2009. “Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (5): 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M., and A. Carmichael. 2011. “Factors Facilitating or Impeding Older Adults’ Creative Contributions in the Collaborative Design of a Novel DTV-Based Application.” Universal Access in the Information Society 12 (1): 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, T., T. W. Leong, J. Durick, and T. Koreshoff. 2014. “Mutual Learning as a Resource for Research Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium Papers, and Keynote Abstracts-Volume 2, 25–28. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sayago, S. 2009. “Human-Computer Interaction with Older People: From Factors to Social Actors.” PhD diss., Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
   Google Scholar
• Sayago, S., A. Rosales, V. Righi, S. M. Ferreira, G. W. Coleman, and J. Blat. 2016. “On the Conceptualization, Design, and Evaluation of Appealing, Meaningful, and Playable Digital Games for Older People.” Games and Culture 11 (1–2): 53–80.10.1177/1555412015597108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R., L. Haddon. 1996. “Design and the Domestication of ICTs : Technical Change and Everyday Life”. In Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technologies, edited by R. Silverstone and R. Mansell, 44–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C. 2010. “Multiple Forms of Appropriation in Self-Monitoring Technology: Reflections on the Role of Evaluation in Future Self-Care.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 26 (5): 537–561.10.1080/10447311003720001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, N., K. Cheverst, P. Wright, and P. Olivier. 2013. “Leaving the Wild: Lessons from Community Technology Handovers.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1549–1558. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Uzor, S., L. Baillie, and D. Skelton. 2012. “Senior Designers: Empowering Seniors to Design Enjoyable Falls Rehabilitation Tools.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1179–1188. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, J., M. Blythe, S. Lindsay, P. Dunphy, A. Monk, and P. Olivier. 2012. “Questionable Concepts: Critique as Resource for Designing with Eighty Somethings.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1169–1178. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar