Placemaking as co-creation – professional roles and attitudes in practice

References

• Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (4): 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awan, Nishat, Tatjana Schneider, and Jeremy Till. 2011. Spatial Agency – Other Ways of Doing Architecture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, R. 1972. “Alternative Networks for the Alternative Culture?” Design Participation: Proceedings of the Design Research Society’s Conference. Brighton: The Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Tomas, Eva Brandt, and Judith Gregory. 2008. “Design Participation(-s).” CoDesign 4 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1080/15710880801905807
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Eva, and Mette Agger Eriksen. 2010. “Co-Design Events. Driving Innovation by a Series of Events.” In Rehearsing the Future, edited by Joachim Halse, Eva Brandt, Brendon Clark, and Thomas Binder, 70–73. Copenhagen: The Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Colin, Hilary Cottam, Chris Vanstone, and Jennie Winhall. 2006. Transformation Design, Red Paper 02. London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Kevin, and Ray Ison. 2009. “Jumping off Arnstein’s Ladder: Social Learning as a New Policy Paradigm for Climate Change Adaptation.” Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 358–373.
   Google Scholar
• Degnegaard, Rex. 2014. “Co-Creation, Prevailing Streams and a Future Design Trajectory.” CoDesign 10 (2): 96–111. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.903282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuflhard, Amelie, and Sophie Krempl-Klieeisen. 2006. Volkspalast – Zwischen Aktivismus Und Kunst. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.
   Google Scholar
• Foverskov, Maria, and Krisrina Dam. 2010. “The Evocative Sketch.” In Rehearsing the Future, edited by Joachim Halse, Eva Brandt, Brendon Clark, and Thomas Binder, 44–49. Copenhagen: The Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillgren, Per-Anders, Anna Seravalli, and Mette Agger Eriksen. 2016. “Counter-Hegemonic Practices; Dynamic Interplay between Agonism, Communing and Strategic Design.” Strategic Design Research Journal 9 (2): 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, Helena. 2014. “Infrastructuring in Participatory Design.” Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers 1: 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Yanki. 2008. “Design Participation Tactics: The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-Design Process.” CoDesign 4 (1): 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs. An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, Sanna, and Andrea Botero. 2016. “Bees, Drones and Other Things in Public Space: Strategizing in the City.” Strategic Design Research Journal 9 (2): 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2009. “Democracy in a Multipolar World.” Millenium-Journal of International Studies 37 (3): 549–561.10.1177/0305829809103232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswalt, Philipp, Klaus Overmeyer, and Philipp Misselwitz. 2013. Urban Catalyst. The Power of Temporary Use. Berlin: DOM Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, Doina. 2005. “Losing Control, Keeping Desire.” In Architecture and Participation, edited by Peter Blundell Jones, Doina Petrescu, and Jeremy Till, 43–63. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, Doina. 2007. How to Make a Community as Well as Space for It, European Platform for Alternative Practice and Research on the City. Accessed April 2, 2014. http://peprav.net/tool/spip.php?article31
   Google Scholar
• Project for Public Spaces. 2016. Placemaking – What If We Built Our Cities around Places? Accessed February 02, 2017. https://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, Toni, and Jesper Simonsen. 2012. “Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Participatory Design.” Design Issues 28 (3): 3–9.10.1162/DESI_a_00157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N. 2010. “Stepping Stones across the Gap – Explorations in the Generative Design Space.” In Rehearsing the Future, edited by Joachim Halse, Eva Brandt, Brendon Clark, and Thomas Binder, 116–120. Copenhagen: The Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, Ida, and Maria Teder. 2005. “Döden I Berlin.” In Sydsvenska Dagbladet Malmö, October 4.
   Google Scholar
• Schneekloth, Lynda H., and Robert G. Shibley. 1995. Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Communities. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, Anna. 2014. Making Commons – Attempts at Composing Prospects in the Opening of Production. Doctoral Dissertation in Interaction Design. School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, Anna, P.-A. Hillgren, and M. Agger Eriksen. 2015. “Co-Designing Collaborative Forms for Urban Commons: Using the Notions of Commoning and Agonism to Navigate the Practicalities and Political Aspects of Collaboration.” Presented at the The City as a Commons: Reconceiving Urban Space, Common Goods and City Governance, 1st Thematic IASC Conference on Urban Commons, Bologna, November 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Silberberg, Susan, Katie Lorah, Rebecca Disbrow, and Anna Muessig. 2013. Places in the Making: How Placemaking Builds Places and Communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Telier, A., T. Binder, G. De Michelis, P. Ehn, G. Jacucci, P. Linde, and I. Wagner. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, Mark, A. 2014. “Definition of Placemaking: Four Different Types.” In Planning & Zoning News 32 (3): 1. http://landpolicy.msu.edu/news/article/lpis_mark_wyckoff_authors_article_on_four_different_types_of_placemaking.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, Mark A. 2015. Placemaking as an Economic Development Tool. East Lansing: Land Policy Institute, Michigan state university.
   Google Scholar