Co-producing, curating, and defining design knowledge in an online practitioner community

References

• Adams, R., L. Mann, S. Jordan, and S. Daly. 2009. “Exploring the Boundaries: Language, Roles, and Structures in Cross-Disciplinary Design Teams.” In About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings, edited by J. McDonnell and P. Lloyd, 339-358. London, UK: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, F., and M. Fuge. 2017. “Capturing Winning Ideas in Online Design Communities.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17), 1675–1687. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2998181.2998249.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., P. Danholt, K. Halskov, N. B. Hansen, and P. Lauritsen. 2015. “Participation as a Matter of Concern in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 250–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 2001. “Design Research and the New Learning.” Design Issues 17 (4): 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterday, M. W., D. Rees Lewis, and E. M. Gerber. 2017. “Designing Crowdcritique Systems for Formative Feedback.” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 27 (3): 623–663. doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0125-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, E. 2013. “Widespread Underprovision on Reddit.” In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13), 803–808. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441866.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M. 2014. “Evolution of Design Competence in UX Practice.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 1645–2654. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557264.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M. 2016. “What Is the Nature and Intended Use of Design Methods?” In Proceedings of the Design Research Society. Brighton, UK: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., C. Dagli, M. Demiral-Uzan, F. Ergulec, V. Tan, A. Altuwaijri, E. Boling, et al. 2015. “Judgment and Instructional Design: How ID Practitioners Work in Practice.” Performance Improvement Quarterly 28 (3): 25-49. doi:10.1002/piq.21198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., and C. D. Howard. 2014. “Designerly Talk in Non-Pedagogical Social Spaces.” Journal of Learning Design 7 (1): 40–58. doi:10.5204/jld.v7i1.153.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., E. Stolterman, and M. A. Siegel. 2014. “Reprioritizing the Relationship between HCI Research and Practice: Bubble-Up and Trickle-Down Effects.” In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14), 725–734. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2598510.2598595.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., and Y. Kou. 2017. “UX Practitioners’ Engagement with Intermediate-Level Knowledge.” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17 Companion), 13–17. doi:10.1145/3064857.3079110.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., P. Sengers, and D. Tatar. 2011. “Making Epistemological Trouble: Third-Paradigm HCI as Successor Science.” Interacting with Computers 23 (5): 385–392. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höök, K., and J. Löwgren. 2012. “Strong Concepts.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1145/2362364.2362371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, Y., and C. M. Gray. 2017. “Supporting Distributed Critique through Interpretation and Sense-Making in an Online Creative Community.” In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, edited by C. Lampe, J. Nichols, K. Karahalios, G. Fitzpatrick, U. Lee, A. Monroy-Hernandez, and W. Stuerzlinger, Article No. 60. doi:10.1145/3134695.
   Google Scholar
• Kou, Y., and C. M. Gray. 2018. “Towards Professionalization in an Online Community of Emerging Occupation: Discourses among UX Practitioners.” In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork (GROUP '18), 322–334. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/3148330.3148352.
   Google Scholar
• Kurath, M. 2015. “Architecture as a Science: Boundary Work and the Demarcation of Design Knowledge from Research.” Science Technology Studies 28 (3): 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K., and L. J. Bannon. 2014. “The Turn to Practice in HCI: Towards a Research Agenda.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 3543–3552. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2556288.2557111.
   Google Scholar
• Kvan, T., W. H. Yip, and A. Vera. 1999. “Supporting Design Studio Learning: An Investigation into Design Communication in Computer-Supported Collaboration.” In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL '99), Article No. 41. edited by C. M. Hoadley and J. Roschelle. Palo Alto, CA: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Lallemand, C., G. Gronier, and V. Koenig. 2015. “User Experience: A Concept without Consensus? Exploring Practitioners’ Perspectives through an International Survey.” Computers in Human Behavior 43: 35–48. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., and K. Dorst. 2009. Design Expertise. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A. 2010. “Situating Design as Social Creation and Cultural Cognition.” Codesign 6 (4): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2010.527009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther, K., J.-L. Tolentino, W. Wu, A. Pavel, B. P. Bailey, M. Agrawala, B. Hartmann, and S. P. Dow. 2015. “Structuring, Aggregating, and Evaluating Crowdsourced Design Critique.” In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 473–485. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2675133.2675283.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, T. 2017. “Disentangling “The Social” in Social Design’s Engagement with the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 160–174. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, J., and L. Dabbish. 2014. “From Rookie to All-Star.” In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14), 922–933. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2531602.2531651.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. G., and E. Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. 2017. The Content Analysis Guidebook. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Piller, F., P. Schubert, M. Koch, and K. Möslein. 2005. “Overcoming Mass Confusion: Collaborative Customer Co-Design in Online Communities.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (4) JCMC1042. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00271.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., S. Ljungblad, E. Buie, T. Clemmensen, S. Dray, R. Fleck, C. M. Gray, et al. 2015. Proceedings of the Nottingham Symposium on Connecting HCI and UX. Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham. doi:10.17639/8vez-c741.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-Designing to Collective Dreaming: Three Slices in Time.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33. doi:10.1145/2685354.
   Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E. 2008. “The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research.” International Journal of Design 2 (1): 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolrych, A., K. Hornbæk, E. Frøkjær, and G. Cockton. 2011. “Ingredients and Meals Rather than Recipes: A Proposal for Research that Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27 (10): 940–970. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, A., and B. Bailey. 2012. “What Do You Think?: A Case Study of Benefit, Expectation, and Interaction in a Large Online Critique Community.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12), 295–304. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/2145204.2145252.
   Google Scholar