Framework of emergence: from chain of value to value constellation

References

• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglements of Matter and Meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings, and Justice-To-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268. doi:10.3366/drt.2010.0206.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1982. The Arcades Project. Translated by Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It’s like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1985. “Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice.” Design Issues 2 (1): 4–22. doi:10.2307/1511524.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., and J. Urry. 2009. “Mobile Methods and the Empirical.” European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1177/1368431008099642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, edited by M. Callon, J. Law, and A. Rip, 19–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castañeda, C. 2002. Figurations: Child, Bodies, Worlds. London & Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, L., R. Whitham, and L. Morris. 2012. “Innovation through the Design of Knowledge Exchange and the Design of Knowledge Exchange Design.” In Proceedings of the DMI Conference - Leading Innovation Through Design, edited by E. Bohemia, J. Liedtka, and A. Rieple, 451-458. Boston, MA: Design Management Institute. 8:451–458.
   Google Scholar
• de la Rosa, J., K. Kohler, and S. Ruecker. 2017. “Prototyping as a Resource to Investigate Future States of the System.” In Proceedings of RSD6 Relating Systems Thinking and Design. https://systemic-design.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/RSD6-dlaRosaKohlerRuecker-1.pdf (unpublished working paper).
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1977. Limited Inc. 10 vols. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1939. Theory of Valuation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrestijn, S., and P. Verbeek. 2013. “Technology, Wellbeing, and Freedom: The Legacy of Utopian Design.” International Journal of Design 7 (3): 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. 1991. Being-In-The-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time. Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 1999. A New Design Philosophy: An Introduction to Defuturing. Randwick: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehman, J., L. K. Trevino, and R. Garud. 2013. “Values Work: A Process Study of the Emergence and Performance of Organizational Values Practices.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 84–112. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gualeni, S. 2015. Virtual Worlds as Philosophical Tools - How to Philosophize with a Digital Hammer. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, N., K. Slegers, and P. Duysburgh. 2015. “Codesign with People Living with Cognitive or Sensory Impairments: A Case for Method Stories and Uniqueness.” CoDesign 11 (1): 70–82. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1020316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoel, A. S., and I. Van der Tuin. 2013. “The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively.” Philosophy & Technology 26 (2): 187–202. doi:10.1007/s13347-012-0092-5.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, N. 2013. “Measuring Knowledge Exchange.” In The Knowledge Exchange, An Interactive Conference Proceedings. Lancaster University. http://thecreativeexchange.org/sites/default/files/ke_conf_papers/paper_14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, K., and Å. Ståhl. 2015. “Figurations of Spatiality and Temporality in Participatory Design and After–Networks, Meshworks and Patchworking.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 222–235. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luján Escalante, M. A., E. Tsekleves, A. F. Bingley, and A. I. Gradinar. 2017. “Ageing Playfully: A Story of Forgetting and Remembering.” Design for Health 1 (1): 134–145. doi:10.1080/24735132.2017.1295529.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2002. Transductions. Bodies and Machines at Speed. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., and J. Law. 2004. “Embodied Action, Enacted Bodies: The Example of Hypoglycaemia.” The Body and Society 10 (2–3): 43–62. doi:10.1177/1357034X04042932.
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, S. 2016. “Responsibility in Design: Applying the Philosophy of Gilbert Simondon.” In 2016 Design Research Society Conference. Brighton, UK: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R., and R. Ramirez. 1998. Designing Interactive Strategy. From Value Chain to Value Constellation. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Prophet, J., and H. Pritchard. 2015. “Ubiquitous-ALife in TechnoSphere 2.0: The Design, Individuation, and Entanglement of Ubicomp Apps in Urban South East Asia.” In Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity and Culture, 280–292. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, D. K., S. Lindtner, I. Erickson, L. Forlano, S. J. Jackson, and B. Kolko. 2014. “Making Cultures: Building Things & Building Communities.” In Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW Companion ’14), 113–116. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Co-Design 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvagnargues, A. 2012. “Crystal and Membranes: Individuation and Temporality.” Translated by Jon Roffe. In Gilbert Simondon. Being and Technology, edited by A. De Boever, A. Murray, J. Roffe, and A. Woodward, 57–60. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The Site of the Social. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 2006. “Domesticating Domestication. Reflecting on the Life of a Concept.” In Domestication of Media and Technology, edited by T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, and K. Ward, 229–247. London: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 1992. “The Genesis of the Individual.” In Incorporations, edited by J. Crary and S. Kwinter (Zone Series 6), 296–319. New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 2012. “Technical Mentality.” Translated by Arne De Boever. In Gilbert Simondon. Being and Technology, edited by A. De Boever, A. Murray, J. Roffe, and A. Woodward, 1–15. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, L., and W. Eggink. 2014a. “How to Interest People for the Hare Instead of the Chase. An Exploration of Open Script Design to Change Consumer Behavior.” In Proceedings of the Annual Design Research Society Conference, 1535–1547. Sweden: Umea Institute of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Stam, L., and W. Eggink. 2014b. “Why Designers and Philosophers Should Meet in School.” In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2010. CosmopoliticsII. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machines Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2012. “Configurations.” In Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, edited by C. Lury and N. Wakeford, 62–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekleves, E., A. Bingley, M. Luján Escalante, and A. Gradinar. 2018. “Engaging People with Dementia in Designing Playful and Creative Practices: Co-Design or Co-Creation?” Dementia. doi:10.1177/1471301218791692.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Eijk, D., J. van Kuijk, F. Hoolhorst, C. Kim, C. Harkema, and S. Dorrestijn. 2012. “Design for Usability; Practice-Oriented Research for User-Centered Product Design.” Work 41 (Supplement 1): 1008–1015. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-1010-1008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verbeek, P. 2015. “Beyond Interaction; a Short Introduction to Mediation Theory.” Interactions 22 (3): 26–31. doi:10.1145/2751314.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M., and A. Wilkie. 2009. “Made in Criticalland: Designing Matters of Concern.” In Networks of Design: Proceedings of the 2008 Annual International Conference of the Design History Society (UK). London: Goldsmiths Research Online. http://research.gold.ac.uk/4657/1/Made_in_Criticalland.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A. 2006. “Ontological Designing.” Design Philosophy Papers 4 (2): 69–92. doi:10.2752/144871306X13966268131514.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltse, H., E. Stolterman, and J. Redström. 2015. “Wicked Interactions: (On the Necessity of) Reframing the ‘Computer’ in Philosophy and Design.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 19 (1): 26–49.
   Google Scholar