Citizen involvement in co-producing decentralised stormwater systems in Brussels

References

• Alford, J. 2002. “Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce? toward a Contingency Theory.” Administration & Society 34 (1): 32–56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder Of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, M., and P. Beugnies. 2008. Bruxelles À L’épreuve De La Participation : Les Contrats De Quartier En Excercise [Brussels Tested for Participation: Neighbourhood Contracts in Practice]. Brussels: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-Production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas 23 (4): 1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2018. “Definitions of Co-Production and Co-Creation.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschure, 33–44. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brusseau. 2018. “Ilot D’eau Le Retour.” Accesed 14 December 2018. http://brusseau.be/approches/ilots-deau/
   Google Scholar
• Dobre, C. C., J. V.-D. Kruijf, L. Moretto, and M. Ranzato. 2018. “Stormwater Management in Transition: The Influence of Technical and Governance Attributes in the Case of Brussels, Belgium.” Environmental Science & Policy 85: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipe, A., A. Renedo, and C. Marston. 2017. “The Co-Production of What? Knowledge, Values, and Social Relations in Health Care.” PLoS Biology 15 (5): 1–6. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glackin, S., and M. R. Dionisio. 2016. “‘Deep Engagement’ and Urban Regeneration: Tea, Trust, and the Quest for Co-Design at Precinct Scale.” Land Use Policy 52: 363–373. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Z., and M. M. Somerville. 2014. “A Comparative Study of Two Design Charrettes: Implications for Codesign and Participatory Action Research.” CoDesign 10 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1080/15710882.2014.881883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. 2013. “Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (1): 27–55. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, T. Flüeler, and R. W. Scholz. 2010. “Functional Dynamic Public Participation in Technological Decision‐Making: Site Selection Processes of Nuclear Waste Repositories.” Journal of Risk Research 13 (7): 861–875. doi:10.1080/13669871003703252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., S. Parrado, T. Bovaird, G. Van Ryzin, and G. International. 2008. “If You Want to Go Fast, Walk Alone. If You Want to Go Far, Walk Together.” Citizens and the Co-Production of Public Services. Paris: Ministry of Budget, Public Finance and Public Services.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., and T. Bovaird. 2016. “User and Community Co-Production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” International Journal of Public Administration 0692 (May): 1–14. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/Large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign 7 (February 2012): 37–41. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Google Scholar
• Marschall, M. J. 2004. “Citizen Participation and the Neighborhood Context: A New Look at the Coproduction of Local Public Goods.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 231. doi:10.2307/3219867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., M. Huberman, and J. M. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M.-F. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.2017.77.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., G. G. van Ryzin, T. Bovaird, and L. Elke 2013. “Correlates of Co-Production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens.” International Public Management Journal 16 (1): 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., and M. Pennington. 2000. “Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital.” Local Environment 5 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/13549830050009328.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2018. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Seravalli, A. M., A. Eriksen, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2017. “Co-Design in Co-Production Processes: Jointly Articulating and Appropriating Infrastructuring and Commoning with Civil Servants.” CoDesign 13 (3): 187–201. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stauffacher, M., T. Flueler, P. Krutli, and R. W. Scholz. 2008. “Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in A Swiss Prealpine Region.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 21 (6): 409–422. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production. Seven Evils.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschure, 284–293. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., and S. Tuurnas. 2018. “The Role of Professional in Co-Production and Co-Creation Process.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschure, 119–136. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto, I., and M. Nishimura. 2008. “The Emergence of Local Non-Profit Government Partnerships and the Role of the Intermediary Organizations in Japan: Contractual Relationships and the Limits to Co-Governance.” In Co-Production: The Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services, edited by V. Pestoff and T. Brandsen, 75–90. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijk, C., and M. Gasco. 2018. “Unravelling the Co-Producers: Who are They and What Motivations to They Have?” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschure, 63–76. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Vliet, B. 2006. “Citizen-Consumer Roles in Enviromental Managment of Large Technological Systems.” In User Behavior and Technology Development, edited by P. P. P. Verbeek and A. Slob, 309–318. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vanleende, D. 2014. “The Co-Producing Citizen: A Case Study on the Motives Affecting Citizen Participation in Community Development.” Master thesis, Ghent Unviersity.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. Routledge. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and K. Callahan. 2007. “Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality.” Public Administration Review 67 (2): 249–264. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. M., A. Farrelly, and R. R. Brown. 2011. Co-Production and the Governance of Decentralised Stormwater Systems. Melbourne: Centre for Water Sensitive Cities, Monash University
   Google Scholar