Publication Cover
CoDesign
International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts
Volume 17, 2021 - Issue 2
945
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The situated function-behavior-structure co-design model

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 211-236 | Received 22 Feb 2019, Accepted 16 Jul 2019, Published online: 27 Aug 2019

References

  • Bott, M. J., and B. Mesmer 2019. “Determination of Function-Behavior-Structure Model Transition Probabilities from Real-world Data.” In AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, AIAA 2019-1030. Reston, VA: AIAA.
  • Chiu, M.-L. 2002. “An Organizational View of Design Communication in Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 23 (2): 187–210. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00019-9.
  • Clark, H. H., and D. Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. “Referring as a Collaborative Process.” Cognition 22: 1–39. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(86)90010-7.
  • Darses, F. 2009. “Résolution collective des problèmes de conception.” Le travail humain 72 (1): 43. doi:10.3917/th.721.0043.
  • Darses, F., F. Détienne, P. Falzon, and W. Visser. 2001. COMET. A Method for Analysing Collective Design Processes (Research Report No. 4258). INRIA. https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00072330
  • Darses, F., and P. Falzon. 1994. “La Conception Collective: Une Approche De L’ergonomie Cognitive.” In Coopération et Conception, edited by G. de Terssac and E. Friedberg, 12. Toulouse, France: Octares.
  • Dorst, K., and N. Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem–solution.” Design Studies 22 (5): 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
  • Dorta, T., A. Lesage, E. Pérez, and J. C. Bastien. 2011. “Signs of Collaborative Ideation and the Hybrid Ideation Space.” In Design Creativity 2010, edited by T. Taura and Y. Nagai, 199–206. London: Springer.
  • Ericsson, K. A., and A. H. Simon. 1984. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Eris, O., N. Martelaro, and P. Badke-Schaub. 2014. “A Comparative Analysis of Multimodal Communication during Design Sketching in Co-located and Distributed Environments.” Design Studies 35 (6): 559–592. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2014.04.002.
  • Gero, J. S. 1990. “Design Prototypes: a Knowledge Representation Schema for Design.” AI Magazine 11 (4): 26–36. doi:10.1609/aimag.v11i4.854.
  • Gero, J. S., and U. Kannengiesser. 2004. “The Situated Function–behaviour–structure Framework.” Design Studies 25 (4): 373–391. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.010.
  • Gibson, C. B. 2001. “From Knowledge Accumulation to Accommodation: Cycles of Collective Cognition in Work Groups.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 (2): 121–134. doi:10.1002/job.84.
  • Goldschmidt, G. 1995. “The Designer as a Team of One.” Design Studies 16 (2): 189–209. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00009-3.
  • Goldschmidt, G. 2014. Linkography, Unfolding the Design Process. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Hamraz, B., N. H. M. Caldwell, T. W. Ridgman, and P. J. Clarkson. 2015. “FBS Linkage Ontology and Technique to Support Engineering Change Management.” Research in Engineering Design 26 (1): 3–35. doi:10.1007/s00163-014-0181-9.
  • Hofmeister, C., P. Kruchten, R. L. Nord, H. Obbink, A. Ran, and P. America. 2007. “A General Model of Software Architecture Design Derived from Five Industrial Approaches.” Journal of Systems and Software 80 (1): 106–126. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.05.024.
  • Lawson, B. 2004. “Schemata, Gambits and Precedent: Some Factors in Design Expertise.” Design Studies 25 (5): 443–457. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001.
  • Maher, M. L., and J. Poon. 1996. “Modeling Design Exploration as Co-evolution.” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 11 (3): 195–209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x.
  • Masclet, C., and J.-F. Boujut. 2010. “Using Situated FBS to Model Design Interactions in a Distant Synchronous Collaborative Situation.” In DESIGN2010, edited by D. Marjanovic, M. Storga, N. Pavkovic and N. Bojcetic, 1585–1594. Croatia: Dubrovnik.
  • Milovanovic, J., and J. Gero. 2018. “Exploration of Cognitive Design Behavior during Design Critiques.” In DESIGN2018, edited by D. Marjanovic, M. Storga, S. Skec, N. Bojcetic and N. Pavkovic, 2099–2110. Croatia: Dubrovnik.
  • Sauder, J., and Y. Jin. 2016. “A Qualitative Study of Collaborative Stimulation in Group Design Thinking.” Design Science 2. doi:10.1017/dsj.2016.1.
  • Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
  • Schön, D. 1992. “Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation.” Research in Engineering Design 3 (3): 131–147. doi:10.1007/BF01580516.
  • Song, T., K. Becker, J. S. Gero, S. Deberard, O. Lawanto, and E. Reeve. 2016. “Problem Decomposition and Recomposition in Engineering Design: A Comparison of Design Behavior between Professional Engineers, Engineering Seniors, and Engineering Freshmen.” Journal of Technology Education 27 (2): 37–56. doi:10.21061/jte.v27i2.a.3.
  • Sonnenburg, S. 2004. “Creativity in Communication: A Theoretical Framework for Collaborative Product Creation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 13 (4): 254–262. doi:10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00314.x.
  • Stempfle, J., and P. Badke-Schaub. 2002. “Thinking in Design Teams - an Analysis of Team Communication.” Design Studies 23 (5): 473–496. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2.
  • Tang, H. H., Y. Y. Lee, and J. S. Gero. 2011. “Comparing Collaborative Co-located and Distributed Design Processes in Digital and Traditional Sketching Environments: A Protocol Study Using the Function–behaviour–structure Coding Scheme.” Design Studies 32 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.06.004.
  • Valkenburg, R., and K. Dorst. 1998. “The Reflective Practice of Design Teams.” Design Studies 19 (3): 249–271. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8.
  • Wiltschnig, S., B. T. Christensen, and L. J. Ball. 2013. “Collaborative Problem–solution Co-evolution in Creative Design.” Design Studies 34 (5): 515–542. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002.
  • Yu, R., and J. S. Gero. 2016. “An Empirical Basis for the Use of Design Patterns by Architects in Parametric Design.” International Journal of Architectural Computing 14 (3): 289–302. doi:10.1177/1478077116663351.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.