Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation

References

• Arrasvuori, J., M. Boberg, J. Holopainen, H. Korhonen, A. Lucero, and M. Montola. 2011. “Applying the PLEX Framework in Designing for Playfulness.” In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces - DPPI ’11, 1. New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekker, Tilde, and Alissa N. Antle. 2011. “Developmentally Situated Design (DSD).” In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in ComputingSystems- CHI ’11, 2531. New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979312.
   Google Scholar
• Belman, J., H. Nissenbaum, M. Flanagan, and J. Diamond. 2011. “Grow-A-Game: A Tool for Values Conscious Design and Analysis of Digital Games.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play, Utrecht, Netherlands, September 14-17.
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., P. Dalsgaard, and K. Halskov. 2010. “Creativity Methods in Interaction Design.” In DESIRE ’10 Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, 12–21. Lancaster: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., P. Dalsgaard, and K. Halskov. 2017. “Understanding Creativity Methods in Design.” In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS ’17, 839–851. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, N., E. Petersson, and S. Frimodt-Møller. 2014. “The Resilience of Analog Tools in Creative Work Practices.” International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (HCI 2014), Crete, Greece 8510: 23–24.
   Google Scholar
• Buur, J., and A. Soendergaard. 2000. “Video Card Game: An Augmented Environment for User Centred Design Discussions.” In Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing Augmented Reality Environments, 63–69. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., and P. J. Clarkson. 2012. “Simulation in User-centred Design: Helping Designers to Empathise with Atypical Users.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (1): 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09544821003742650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.-C., and X. Wang. 2012. “Design for Well-being in China.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Exploratory Papers Workshop Descriptions Industry Cases - Volume 2 - PDC ’12, 81. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clatworthy, S. 2011. “Service Innovation through Touch-points: Development of an Innovation Toolkit for the First Stages of New Service Development.” International Journal of Design 5 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, K., E. Melcer, and M. Mateas. 2017. “Generominos: Ideation Cards for Interactive Generativity.” Paper presented at the 13th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE'17), Snowbird, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, K., and M. Mateas. 2017. “A Generative Framework of Generativity.” Paper presented at the Experimental AI in Games Workshop, the 13th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment (AIIDE'17), Snowbird, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1997. “Descriptive Models of Creative Design: Application to an Example.” Design Studies 18 (4): 427–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00010-0.
   Google Scholar
• Dalsgaard, P. 2017. “Instruments of Inquiry: Understanding the Nature and Role of Tools in Design.” International Journal of Design 11 (1): 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roeck, D., P. J. Stappers, and A. Standaert. 2014. “Gearing Up! A Designer-focused Evaluation of Ideation Tools for Connected Products.” In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI ’14), 521–530. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Freach, J. n.d. “Behold and Beware, Design Toolkits.” University of Texas Austin, School of Design and Creative Technologies. https://designcreativetech.utexas.edu/behold-and-beware-design-toolkits
   Google Scholar
• Frich, J., M. M. Biskjaer, and P. Dalsgaard. 2018. “Twenty Years of Creativity Research in Human-Computer Interaction: Current State and Future Directions.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ‘18), 1235–1257. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B. 1996. “Value-sensitive Design.” Interactions 3 (6): 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and W. S. Bainbridge. 2006. “Value Sensitive Design.” In Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations, edited by P. Zang and D. Galletta, 348–372. NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and D. G. Hendry. 2012. “The Envisioning Cards: A Toolkit for Catalyzing Humanistic and Technical Imaginations.” In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’12, 1145–1148. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gedenryd, H. 1998. How Designers Work. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. 1994. “Computational Models of Creative Design Processes.” In Artificial Intelligence and Creativity, edited by T. Dartnall, 269–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., and P. Dalsgård. 2006. “Inspiration Card Workshops.” Paper presented at the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, University Park, PA, USA, June 26-28.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, N. V., J. J. Shah, and S. M. Smith. 2010. “Understanding Design Ideation Mechanisms through Multilevel Aligned Empirical Studies.” Design Studies 31 (4): 382–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, X. 2017. “Evoking Inspiration for Game Jam Ideas.” Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events - ICGJ ’17, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• IDEO. 2003. IDEO Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design. San Francisco, CA: William Stout.
   Google Scholar
• Inie, N., and P. Dalsgaard. 2017. “How Interaction Designers Use Tools to Capture, Manage, and Collaborate on Ideas.” In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’17, 2668–2675. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, B. 2005. “Design Ideation: The Conceptual Sketch in the Digital Age.” Design Studies 26 (6): 613–624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keränen, K. E. 2015. “An Exploration of the Characteristics of Co-creation in the B2B Service Business.” Doctoral thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska, J. 2014. “(Un)structured Sources of Inspiration: Comparing the Effects of Game-like Cards and Design Cards on Creativity in Co-design Process.” PDC '14:Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers 1 (2010): 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowska, J., W. Bartkowski, O. Górnicka, and D. Lamas. 2015. “Applying Generative Techniques to Avoid Technology Push Effect in Ideas and Prototypes Created by Technology-oriented People.” In Proceedings of the Mulitimedia, Interaction, Design and Innnovation (MIDI ‘15), Article 16. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lamadrid, M. 2018. “Social Design Toolkit.” http://www.thesis.mlamadrid.com/?page_id=4
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, D. 2017. “Design, Behaviour Change, and the Design with Intent Toolkit.” In Design for Behaviour Change: Theories and Practices of Designing for Change, edited by K. Niedderer, S. J. Clune, and G. Ludden, 58–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Logler, N., D. Yoo, and B. Friedman. 2018. “Metaphor Cards.” In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018 - DIS ’18, 1373–1386. NY: ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1113/JP275465.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, A., and J. Arrasvuori. 2010. “PLEX Cards: A Source of Inspiration When Designing for Playfulness.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games (Fun and Games ‘10), 28–37. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, A., and J. Arrasvuori. 2013. “The PLEX Cards and Its Techniques as Sources of Inspiration When Designing for Playfulness.” International Journal of Arts and Technology 6 (1): 22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2013.050688.
   Google Scholar
• Mekky, S., and A. Lucero. 2016. “An Exploration of Designing for Playfulness in a Business Context.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA ’16, 3136–3143. NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molin-Juustila, T. 2006. “Cross-Functional Interaction during the Early Phases of User-Centered Software New Product Development: Reconsidering the Common Area of Interest.” Doctoral diss., University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C., E. Cutrell, A. Dhareshwar, K. Doherty, A. Thieme, and A. Taylor. 2017. “Imagining Artificial Intelligence Applications with People with Visual Disabilities Using Tactile Ideation.” In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ‘17), 81–90. New York, NY: ACM. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2016.1263586.
   Google Scholar
• Noël, G. 2015. “Designing a Visual Tool to Interview People with Communication Disabilities: A User-centered Approach.” Visible Language 49 (1/2): 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Ojasalo, K., and J. Ojasalo. 2015. “Adapting Business Model Thinking to Service Logic: An Empirical Study on Developing a Service Design Tool.” The Nordic School, 309–333.
   Google Scholar
• Regal, G., E. Mattheiss, D. Sellitsch, and M. Tscheligi. 2016. “TalkingCards: Using Tactile NFC Cards for Accessible Brainstorming.” Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016 (AH ’16), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenman, M., and J. Gero. 1993. “Creativity in Design Using a Design Prototype Approach.” In Modelling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design, edited by J. Gero and M. L. Maher. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014b. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Co-design.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014a. Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schoen, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Swann, D. 2011. “NHS at Home: Using Lego Serious Play to Capture Service Narratives and Envision Future Healthcare Products.” http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/13355/
   Google Scholar
• The LEGO Group. n.d. “LEGO Serious Play Material.” https://www.lego.com/en-us/seriousplay/material
   Google Scholar
• Tholander, J. 2014. “Using Body Cards in a Design Process for Going from Bodily Experiences to Design.” In Proceedings of the 28th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference on HCI 2014 - Sand, Sea and Sky - Holiday HCI (BCS-HCI ‘14), 141–150. UK: BCS.
   Google Scholar
• Tidball, B., P. J. Stappers, and I. Mulder. 2010. “Models, Collections and Toolkits for Human Computer Interaction: What Can We Learn?.” Proceedings of the 2010 British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction, BCS-HCI 2010, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, M. M. M., R. Spijkerman, R. H. M. Goossens, V. M. Hendriks, and V. T. Visch. 2014. “PLEX as Input and Evaluation Tool in Persuasive Game Design: Pilot Study.” CHI PLAY 2014 - In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 449–450. New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., and R. T. Watson. 2002. “Analyzing the past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review.” MIS Quarterly 26 (2): xiii–xxiii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, R., T. Rodden, and S. Benford. 2016. “Developing Ideation Cards for Mixed Reality Game Design.” Proceedings of the DiGRA and FDG First Joint International Conference (DiGRA/FDG 2016), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Winschiers-Theophilus, H., S. Chivuno-Kuria, G. K. Kapuire, N. J. Bidwell, and E. Blake. 2010. “Being Participated - A Community Approach.” Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC ’10), Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wölfel, C., and T. Merritt. 2013. “Method Card Design Dimensions: A Survey of Card-based Design Tools.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 8117 LNCS (PART 1), 479–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-12-0498.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Y., and K. Nakakoji. 2005. “Interaction Design of Tools for Fostering Creativity in the Early Stages of Information Design.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 63 (4–5 SPEC. ISS.): 513–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar