The politics of co-design in ICT for sustainable development

References

• Bannon, L. 1991. “From Human Factors to Human Actors: The Role of Psychology and Human-computer Interaction Studies in System Design.” In Design at Work, edited by J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, 25–44. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An International Journal 26 (1–2): 245–273. doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borning, A., and M. Muller. 2012. “Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12), 1125–1134. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bratteteig, T., and I. Wagner. 2015. Disentangling Participation Power and Decision-Making in Participatory Design. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1994. “The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal.” World Development 22 (7): 953–969. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. 2003. “Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development.” World Development 31 (8): 1325–1342. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00086-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, E., and E. Harrison. 1998. Whose Development? an Ethnography of Aid. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dalberg. 2019. Solving Plastic Pollution through Accountability, A Report for WWF. Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A. 2013. “See No Evil? Ethics in an Interventionist ICTD.” Information Technology and International Development 9 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., and D. Kleine. 2019. “Ethical Standards for the ICTD/ICT4D Community: A Participatory Process and A Co-created Document.” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, Article 38. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Deneulin, S., and J. A. McGregor. 2010. “The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Wellbeing.” European Journal of Social Theory 13 (4): 501–519. doi:10.1177/1368431010382762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindler, C., and O. S. Iversen. 2014. “Relational Expertise in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’14), 41–50. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, L., S. R. Sterling, and J. K. Bennett. 2013. “Considering Failure: Eight Years of ITID Research.” In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD ’12), 56–64. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P., and M. Kyng. 1987. “The Collective Resource Approach to System Design.” In Computers and Democracy–a Scandinavian Challenge, edited by G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, 17–57. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, N. 2015. “Governing Impact in the International Development Sector Introduction: NGOs and Impact, Key Note.” Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Negombo, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. 2002. “Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations.” The Information Society 18 (2): 101–112. doi:10.1080/01972240290075039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., and A. V. Ospina. 2018. “Conceptualising the Link between Information Systems and Resilience: A Developing Country Field Study.” Information Systems Journal 29 (1): 70–96. doi:10.1111/isj.12177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Giménez, E., and M. A. Altieri. 2013. “Agroecology, Food Sovereignty, and the New Green Revolution.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 37 (1): 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L., J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter. 2010. “Postcolonial Computing.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), 1311–1320. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Karasti, H. 2014. “Infrastructuring in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers - PDC ’14, 141–150. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2017. “ICTs for Agroecology.” In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, 451–462. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2018. “Disentangling Participatory ICT Design in Socioeconomic Development.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’18), Article 3. New York, Ny: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., and A. Dearden. 2018b. “Towards Alternate Theories of Change for M4ARD.” In Digital Technologies for Agricultural and Rural Development in the Global South, edited by R. Duncombe, 92–103. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine, D., and T. Unwin. 2009. “Technological Revolution, Evolution and New Dependencies: What’s New about Ict4d?.” Third World Quarterly 30 (5): 1045–1067. doi:10.1080/01436590902959339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, S., and M. J. Muller. 1993. “Participatory Design.” Communications of the ACM 36 (6): 24–29. doi:10.1145/153571.255960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• le Dantec, C. A., and C. DiSalvo. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264. doi:10.1177/0306312712471581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama (2012). “The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Research Papers: Volume 1 - PDC ’12, 61–70. New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama (2014). “Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers, Volume 1 (PDC ’14), 151–160. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2006). Design, Ethics and Sustainability. Guidelines for a Transition Phase. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, A., and S. Howard. 1998. “Methods & Tools: The Rich Picture: A Tool for Reasoning about Work Context.” Interactions 5 (2): 21–30. doi:10.1145/274430.274434.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. 2000. “Women’s Capabilities and Social Justice.” Journal of Human Development 1 (2): 219–247. doi:10.1080/713678045.
   Google Scholar
• Pelenc, J., D. Bazile, and C. Ceruti. 2015. “Collective Capability and Collective Agency for Sustainability: A Case Study.” Ecological Economics 118: 226–239. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti (2016). “Reflexive Engagement: Enacting Reflexivity in Design and for ‘Participation in Plural’.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 21–30. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Poderi, G., and Y. Dittrich (2018). “Participatory Design and Sustainability: A Literature Review of PDC Proceedings.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (PDC ’18), Article 2. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Politics (2019). In Merriam-Webster.com. Accessed 30 May 2019 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/politics
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think like a 21st-century Economist. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T., and J. Simonsen. eds. 2012. “Participatory Design: An Introduction.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, 21–38. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tacchi, J. A., D. Slater, and G. N. Hearn. 2003. Ethnographic Action Research: A User’s Handbook. New Delhi: Unes.
   Google Scholar
• Toyama, K. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudev, J., and B. Parthasarathy 2007. “The Post Consumptive Residues of Information and Communication Technologies - Transnational E-waste Flows and Developmental Dilemmas.” In 2007 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 1–9. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., C. S. Holling, S. Carpenter, and A. Kinzig. 2004. “Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 9 (2): 5. doi:10.5751/ES-00650-090205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., N. White, and J. D. Smith. 2009. Digital Habitats: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Portland, OR: Cpsquare.
   Google Scholar
• West Bengal Department of Planning. (2010). “District Human Development Report South 24 Parganas.” HDRCC, Development & Planning Department Government of West Bengal. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/hdr_south24_parganas_2009_full_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). “Our Common Future.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1057/jit.2015.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar