Readiness for contingency: punctuation, poise, and co-design

References

• Akama, Y. 2015. “Being Awake to Ma: Designing in Between-ness as a Way of Becoming With.” In CoDesign 11 (3–4): 262–274. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2018. “Surrendering to the Ocean: Practices of Mindfulness and Presence in Designing.” In The Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Design, edited by R. B. Egenhoefer, 219–230. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., D. Evans, S. Keen, F. McMillan, M. McMillan, and P. West. 2017. “Designing Digital and Creative Scaffolds to Strengthen Indigenous Nations: Being Waradjuri by Practising Sovereignty.” Journal of Digital Creativity 28 (1): 58–72. doi:10.1080/14626268.2017.1291525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannon, L. J., and P. Ehn. 2013. “Design: Design Matters in Participatory Design.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 37–63. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Agonistic Participatory Design: Working with Marginalised Social Movements.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 127–144. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.672577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruineberg, J., and E. Rietveld. 2014. “Self-organization, Free Energy Minimization, and Optimal Grip on a Field of Affordances.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (Aug.): 1–14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., A. Clement, and V. Pipek. 2013. “Communities: Participatory Design For, with and by Communities.” In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, 182–209. London and NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heathcote, D. 1984. Collected Writings on Drama and Education. Abingdon, UK: Heinemann Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and Time. Translated By J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. London: SCM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Höök, K., and J. Löwgren. 2012. “Strong Concepts: Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Interaction Design Research.” Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1145/2362364.2362371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie, P. 2012. “Philosophy of Life: J. L. Moreno’s Revolutionary Philosophical Underpinnings of Psychodrama, and Group Psychotherapy.” The Journal of the Eastern Group Psychotherapy Society 36 (2): 135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., K. Halskov, and T. W. Leong. 2010. “Rekindling Values in Participatory Design”. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, 91–100. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Kasulis, T. 2004. Shinto: The Way Home. Hawaii: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2015. “Troubling Futures: Can Participatory Design Research Provide a Constitutive Anthropology for the 21st Century?” Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A 26: 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A. 2018. “Writing PD: Accounting for Socially-Engaged Research.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2, Article 1. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2019. “The Nature of ‘Obligation’ in Doing Design with Communities: Participation, Politics and Care.” In Tricky Design: Ethics through Things, edited by T. Fisher and L. Gamman, 131–142. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2012. “The Human Touch: Participatory Practice and the Role of Facilitation in Designing with Communities.” In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, 61–70. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, J., and E. Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A. 2006. “Method as Ethic, Ethic as Method.” Journal of Information Ethics 15 (2): 37–55. doi:10.3172/JIE.15.2.37.
   Google Scholar
• Minh-ha, T. 1989. Woman, Native, Other: Writing Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. 1946. Psychodrama, First Volume. Beacon, NY: Beacon House.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. L. 1955. “Theory of Spontaneity-Creativity, Sociometry.” Sociometry 18 (4): 105–118. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2785848
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, C. 1984. Drama Structures. Abingdon, UK: Heinemann Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, S., and H. Karasti. 2016. “Reflexive Engagement: Enacting Reflexivity in Design and for ‘Participation in Plural’”. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 21–30. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Rode, J. A. 2011. “Reflexivity in Digital Anthropology.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’11), 123–132. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2008. The Craftsman. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuedahl, D., A. Morrison, C. Mörtberg, and T. Bratteteig. 2010. “Researching Digital Design.” In Exploring Digital Design. Multi-disciplinary Design Practices, edited by I. Wagner, T. Bratteteig, and D. Stuedahl, 3–15, London: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2002. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 12: 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, J., R. Clarke, P. Wright, J. McCarthy, and P. Olivier. 2013. “Configuring Participation: On How We Involve People In Design.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), 429–438. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar