Visions that change. Articulating the politics of participatory design

References

• Akama, Y. 2015. “Being Awake to Ma: Designing in between-Ness as a Way of Becoming With.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 262–274. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avram, G., J. H.-J. Choi, S. De Paoli, A. Light, P. Lyle, and M. Teli. 2019. “Repositioning CoDesign in the Age of Platform Capitalism: From Sharing to Caring.” CoDesign 15 (3): 185–191. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1638063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, T., E. Brandt, P. Ehn, and J. Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–165. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauvelt, A. 2008. “Towards Relational Design.” Design Observer. 21. https://designobserver.com/feature/towards-relational-design/7557
   Google Scholar
• Bødker, S., and M. Kyng. 2018. “Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25 (1): 4:1–4:31. doi:10.1145/3152421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Dijon: Les Presses du réel.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, J. 2011. “The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention.” In The Map Reader, edited by M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, and C. Perkins, 89–101. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470979587.ch12.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, A., H. Paredes, and B. Fonseca. 2018. “Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Publications in CSCW.” Scientometrics 114 (1): 31–89. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2562-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillahunt, T. R., X. Wang, E. Wheeler, H. F. Cheng, B. Hecht, and H. Zhu. 2017. “The Sharing Economy in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1(CSCW): 1–26. doi:10.1145/3134673.
   Google Scholar
• Dilnot, C. 2015. History, Design, futures: Contending with what we wave made. In Design and the Question of History, edited by Fry, Tony, C. Dilnot, and S. Stewart. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Dindler, C., and O. S. Iversen. 2014. “Relational Expertise in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1, 41–50. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2661435.2661452.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, C. 2019. “Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Frauenberger, C., M. Foth, and G. Fitzpatrick. 2018. “On Scale, Dialectics, and Affect: Pathways for Proliferating Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 1–13. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210591.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2014. City Futures in the Age of a Changing Climate. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315765969.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017b. “Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 145–147. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017a. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., N. Hendriks, and S. Martens. 2017. “Counterfactual Scripting: Challenging the Temporality of Participation.” CoDesign 13 (2): 96–109. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1309438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., V. Tassinari, B. Roosen, and T. Constantinescu. 2018. 'Work, Labour and Action: The Role of Participatory Design in (Re)activating the Political Dimension of Work'. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 1–11. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210599.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, I. L., Y. Lin, T. J.-J. Li, A. Hall, A. Halfaker, J. Schöning, and B. Hecht. 2016. “Not at Home on the Range: Peer Production and the Urban/Rural Divide.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 13–25. San Jose, CA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858123.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and C. Miskelly. 2019. “Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (3): 591–626. doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, P., M. Sciannamblo, and M. Teli. 2018. “Fostering Commonfare. Infrastructuring Autonomous Social Collaboration.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3173574.3174026.
   Google Scholar
• Mannocci, A., F. Osborne, and E. Motta. 2019. “The Evolution of IJHCS and CHI: A Quantitative Analysis.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 131 (Nov.): 23–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.05.009.
   Google Scholar
• Mazé, R. 2019. “Politics of Designing Visions of the Future.” Journal of Futures Studies 23: 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, T. 2016. “History in and for Design.” Journal of Design History 29 (1): 58–70. doi:10.1093/jdh/epv044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, N. M., J. Hardy, M. Vigil-Hayes, T. Veinot, and S. Bardzell. 2019. “Call for Papers: Special Issue on Rural Computing and HCI.” Rural Computing and HCI [blog], October 4. https://ruralhci.info/2019/10/04/call-for-papers/
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2007. “The Post-Political City.” In Urban Politics Now: Re-Imagining Democracy in the Neo-Liberal City, edited by BAVO, 58–76. Rotterdam: NAi.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, M. 2015. “Computing and the Common: Hints of a New Utopia in Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives, 17–20. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. doi:10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21318.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, M., and M. Menendez-Blanco. 2018. “Design Initiatives in Public Spaces : Eight Interpretative Lenses.” In Participatory Design Theory, edited by O. Devisch, L. Huybrechts, and R. De Ridder, 71–86. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315110332-6.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, M., A. Di Fiore, and V. D’Andrea. 2017. “Computing and the Common: A Case of Participatory Design with Think Tanks.” CoDesign 13 (2): 83–95. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1309439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teli, M., P. Lyle, and M. Sciannamblo. 2018. “Institutioning the Common: The Case of Commonfare.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1, 1-11. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/3210586.3210590.
   Google Scholar
• Thebault-Spieker, J., L. Terveen, and B. Hecht. 2015. “Avoiding the South Side and the Suburbs: The Geography of Mobile Crowdsourcing Markets.” In CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 265–275. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2675133.2675278.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E. and M. McKenzie. 2015. Place in Research : Theory, Methodology, and Methods. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315764849.
   Google Scholar