Values and argumentation in collaborative design

References

• Baker, M. J. 2009a. “Argumentative Interactions and the Social Construction of Knowledge.” In Argumentation and Education: Theoretical Foundations and Practices, edited by N. Muller Mirza and A. N. Perret-Clermont, 127–144. New York: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. 2009b. “Intersubjective and Intrasubjective Rationalities in Pedagogical Debates: Realizing What One Thinks.” In Transformation of Knowledge through Classroom Interaction, edited by B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, and R. Hershkowitz, 145–158. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., F. Détienne, and F. Barcellini. 2017. “Argumentation and Conflict Management in Online Epistemic Communities: A Narrative Approach to Wikipedia Debates.” In Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, edited by F. Arcidiacono and A. Bova, 141–157. Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4_7.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J., F. Détienne, K. Lund, and A. Séjourné. 2009. “Étude des profils interactifs dans une situation de conception collective en architecture..” In Méthodologies D’analyse De Situations Coopératives De Conception: Corpus MOSAIC, edited by F. Détienne and V. Traverso, 183–220. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
   Google Scholar
• Barcellini, F., L. Prost, and M. Cerf. 2015. “Designers’ and Users’ Roles in Participatory Design: What Is Actually Co-designed by Participants?” Applied Ergonomics 50: 31–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Borning, A., B. Friedman, J. Davis, and P. Lin. 2005. “Informing Public Deliberation: Value Sensitive Design of Indicators for a Large-scale Urban Simulation.” ECSCW 2005: 449–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4023-7_23.
   Google Scholar
• Boztepe, S. 2007. “User Value: Competing Theories and Models.” International Journal of Design 1 (2): 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, F., A. Gillespie, and T. Zittoun. 2013. “Collaborative Analysis of Qualitative Data.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 79–93. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/2F9781446282243.n6.
   Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. J. Baker, and J.-M. Burkhardt. 2012. “Quality of Collaboration in Design Meetings: Methodological Reflexions.” CoDesign 8 (4): 247–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.729063.
   Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. J. Baker, D. Fréard, F. Barcellini, A. Denis, and M. Quignard. 2016. “The Descent of Pluto: Interactive Dynamics, Specialisation and Reciprocity of Roles in a Wikipedia Debate.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 86: 11–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.09.002.
   Google Scholar
• Détienne, F., M. J. Baker, and C. Le Bail. 2019. “Ideologically-Embedded Design: Community, Collaboration and Artefact.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 131: 72–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and D. G. Hendry. 2019. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., and P. H. Kahn. 2007. “Human Values, Ethics, and Design.” In The Human-computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, edited by A. J. Jacko and A. Sears, 1241–1266. Boca Raton: CRC press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781410615862.ch63.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., P. H. Kahn, A. Borning, and A. Huldtgren. 2013. “Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, and M. Gorman, 55–95. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/2F978-94-007-7844-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., L. P. Nathan, M. Lake, N. C. Grey, T. T. Nilsen, R. F. Utter, E. J. Utter, M. Ring, and Z. Kahn. 2010. “Multi-Lifespan Information System Design in Post-Conflict Societies.” Proceedings of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI EA’10, Atlanta, GA, USA. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753870
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., L. P. Nathan, and D. Yoo. 2016. “Multi-lifespan Information System Design in Support of Transitional Justice: Evolving Situated Design Principles for the Long(er) Term.” Interacting with Computers 29 (1): 80–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv045.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, C., and P. Coirier. 1996. “The Production and Recognition of Typological Argumentative Text Markers.” Argumentation 10 (2): 271–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00180729.
   Google Scholar
• Höjer, M., and J. Wangel. 2015. “Smart Sustainable Cities: Definition and Challenges.” In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, edited by L. M. Hilty and B. Aebischer, 333–349. Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09228-7_20.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bail, C. 2018. “La dimension idéologique en conception collaborative: Anticiper un système sociotechnique citoyen innovant pour une gestion durable et partagée des ressources.” PhD Diss., Télécom ParisTech.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bail, C., F. Détienne, and M. J. Baker. 2016. “A Methodological Approach to the Conceptualisation of A Socio-technical System: A Smart and Collaborative Neighbourhood.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE’16, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., and A. Oak. 2018. “Cracking Open Co-creation: Categories, Stories, and Value Tension in a Collaborative Design Process.” Design Studies 57: 93–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2012. “Accommodating Disagreement: A Study of Effective Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 33 (1): 44–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, L., and S. Hyysalo. 2018. “Designing for Energy Transition through Value Sensitive Design.” Design Studies 54: 162–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., S. McAlister, and M. Mulder. 2016. “Impacts of a Digital Dialogue Game and Epistemic Beliefs on Argumentative Discourse and Willingness to Argue.” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 (3): 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2297.
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, C. 2018. Dictionary of Argumentation: An Introduction to Argumentation Studies. Milton Keynes: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, K. W., T. M. Parris, and A. A. Leiserowitz. 2005. “What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47 (3): 8–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., and M. Baker. 2017. Dialogue, Argumentation and Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316493960.
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux, L. 2001. “Role-play or Debate to Promote Students’ Argumentation and Justification on an Issue in Animal Transgenesis.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (9): 903–927. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010016076.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, S. C., and J. McDonnell. 2002. “Talking about Team Framing: Using Argumentation to Analyse and Support Experiential Learning in Early Design Episodes.” Design Studies 23 (1): 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00020-5.
   Google Scholar
• Trousse, B., and H. Christiaans. 1996. “Design as Topos-based Argumentative Activity: A Protocol Analysis Study.” In Analysing Design Activity, edited by N. Cross, H. Christiaans, and K. Dorst, 365–388. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511616389.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. 1989. Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar