‘The blue dot thing’: a discourse analysis of learner interlanguage in instructional design

References

• Anthony, K. H. 1991. Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Design Studio. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, K. L. 2020. “The Design Discourse of Professional Instructional Designers.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Bevins, K. L., and C. D. Howard. 2020. “The Design Discourse of the Advanced Beginner.” In A New Focus for Learning: Educational Technology beyond Content, edited by B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, M. Schmidt, A. Grincewicz, and A. Tawfik, 136–153. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, E. 2010. “The Need for Design Cases: Disseminating Design Knowledge.” International Journal of Designs for Learning 1 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, E. (2017). Teaching the complex performance of Instructional Design. In Issues in technology, learning, and instructional design: Classic and contemporary dialogues, edited by A. A. Carr-Chellman, and G. Rowland, 60–61. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Boling, E., and C. M. Gray. 2018. “Use of Precedent as a Narrative Practice in Design.”  In Educational Technology and Narrative: Story and Instructional Design, edited by B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, and K. Kaminiski, 259–270. Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69914-1_21.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. 1994. “Media Will Never Influence Learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 42 (2): 21–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies 3 (4): 221–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. London, UK: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dannels, D. P., and K. N. Martin. 2008. “Critiquing Critiques: A Genre Analysis of Feedback across Novice to Expert Design Studios.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22 (2): 135–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651907311923.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, A. 2009. The Language of Design: Theory and Computation. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finegan, E. 2013. “Discourses in the Language of the Law.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by J. Gee and M. Handford, 508–519, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2014a. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2014b. How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, A. S. 2013. An Architectural Approach to Instructional Design. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., C. Dagli, M. Demiral‐Uzan, F. Ergulec, V. Tan, A. A. Altuwaijri, K. Gyabak, and E. Boling. 2015. “Judgment and Instructional Design: How ID Practitioners Work in Practice.” Performance Improvement Quarterly 28 (3): 25–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21198.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., and C. D. Howard. 2014. “Designerly Talk in Non-pedagogical Social Spaces.” Journal of Learning Design 7 (1): 40–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i1.153.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C. M., and Y. Kou. 2019. “Co-producing, Curating, and Defining Design Knowledge in an Online Practitioner Community.” CoDesign 15 (1): 41–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1563193.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, K. L., and R. M. Branch. 1997. Survey of Instructional Development Models. Syracuse, NY: Information Resources Publications, Syracuse University, 4-194 Center for Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, K., and S. Adolphs. 2013. “Discourse and Healthcare.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by J. Gee and M. Handford, 496–507. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hokanson, B. 2012. “The Design Critique as a Model for Distributed Learning.” In The Next Generation of Distance Education, edited by L. Moller and J. Huett, 71–83. Boston: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D. 2012. “Higher Order Thinking in Collaborative Video Annotations: Investigating Discourse Modelling and the Staggering of Learner Participation.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D. 2014. “The Rhetoric of Instructional Design Cases: Knowledge Building via Examples of Process and Product.” In Design in Educational Technology: Design Thinking, Design Process, and the Design Studio, edited by B. Hokanson and A. Gibbins, 107–124. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D., C. Staples, S. Dubreil, and L. Yamagata-Lynch. 2016. “The App Farm: Engaging Design Process as a Means for French Learning.” International Journal of Designs for Learning 7 (3): 42–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v7i3.21658.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, C. D., and R. H. Benedicks. 2020. “An Industry Liaison for Graduate Learning in Instructional Design.” Tech Trends 64: 451–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and S. Blum-Kulka. 1993. “Interlanguage Pragmatics: An Introduction.” Interlanguage Pragmatics 3: 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, J. E., G. R. Morrison, S. M. Ross, and H. K. Kalman. 2004. Designing Effective Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2006. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Laffey, J., C. Amelung, and S. Goggins. 2014. “Using Analytics for Activity Awareness in Learning Systems.” International Journal of Designs for Learning 5 (2): 101–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v5i2.12886.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. 2004. “Schemata, Gambits and Precedent: Some Factors in Design Expertise.” Design Studies 25 (5): 443–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., and K. Dorst. 2009. “Expertise in design”. In Design expertise, 81-112. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. G., and E. Stolterman. 2012. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Vol. 9. 2nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. E. 1994. “Precedents in Design: A Computational Model for the Organization of Precedent Knowledge.” Design Studies 15 (2): 141–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90021-3.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, P. E. 2009. “Aesthetic Principles for Instructional Design.” Educational Technology Research and Development 57 (4): 511–528. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9060-7.
   Google Scholar
• Reiser, R. A., and J. V. Dempsey. 2012. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, P. G. 1987. Design Thinking. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. M. 2010. “Producing the Rigorous Design Case.” International Journal of Designs for Learning 1 (1): 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tatar, D. 2007. “The Design Tensions Framework.” Human–Computer Interaction 22 (4): 413–451.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, M. W., and E. Boling. 2014. “Preparing Instructional Designers: Traditional and Emerging Perspectives.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited by J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Ellen, and M. Bishop, 653–660. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. G., and R. Martens. 2002. “Computer-based Tools for Instructional Design: An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Educational Technology Research and Development 50 (4): 5–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504980.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. 2011. “Essay: In Search of the Secret Handshakes of ID.” (PDF). The Journal of Applied Instructional Design 1 (1): 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar