Conditions for experiential knowledge exchange in collaborative research across the sciences and creative practice

References

• Berger, E., K. Mäki-Reinikka, K. O’Reilly, and H. Sederholm, Eds. 2020. Art as We Don’t Know It. Espoo: Aalto ARTS books.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H. 2012. The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Amsterdam: Leiden University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, H., P. Peters, and T. Pinch, Eds. 2020. Dialogues between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., and E. Edmonds. 2018. “Practice-based Research in the Creative Arts, Foundations and Futures from the Frontline.” Leonardo Journal 51 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2007. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, A. J., C. Peralta, and J. Moultrie. 2011. “Exploring How Industrial Designers Can Contribute to Scientific Research.” International Journal of Design 5 (1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2009. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J. 2010. The Foundations of Research. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2018. “Art, Science and the Meaning of Research.” Synnyt/Origins Journal, Special Issue: Catalyses, Interventions, Transformations 3: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, A. 2017. “Stretch Collaboration: How to Work with People You Don’t Agree with or like or Trust.” Strategy & Leadership 45 (2): 42–45. doi:10.1108/SL-02-2017-0013.
   Google Scholar
• Karana, E., N. Nimkulrat, E. Giaccardi, K. Niederrer, and J. Fan. 2019. “Alive. Active. Adaptive: Experiential Knowledge and Emerging Materials.” International Journal of Design 13 (2): 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karana, E., O. Pedgley, and V. Rognoli, Eds. 2015. Materials Experience: Fundamentals on Materials and Design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, T.-M., M. Koria, and M. Salimäki 2009. “Educating T-shaped Design, Business and Engineering Professionals.” Proceedings of the 19th CIRP Design Conference - Competitive Design, 555. Cranfield, UK: Cranfield University..
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, P. 2017. “Lab – Fab – App.” Investing in the European future we want. Report of the independent high level group on maximising the impact of EU Research & Innovation Programmes. Brussels, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan, R., and R. Grover. 1998. “From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management.” Journal of Marketing 62 (October): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, M., C. Nazir, F. Malina Roger, A. García Topete, F. C. Londoño, A. F. Roldán, P. L. Farias, and J. Silveira, 2018. “An Emerging Role for Design Methods in Transdisciplinary Practice.” Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on electronic art, ISEA, Durban University of Technology, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, June 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2014. “Methodology of Transdiciplinarity.” World Futures 70 (3–4): 186–199. doi:10.1080/02604027.2014.934631.
   Google Scholar
• Niedderer, K. 2007. “Mapping the Meaning of Knowledge in Design Research.” Design Research Quarterly 2 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Niedderer, K., and L. Reilly. 2010. “Research Practice in Art and Design: Experiential Knowledge and Organized Inquiry.” Journal of Research Practice 6 (2): 1–11. Article E2.
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K. 2018. “YABBA DABBA DOO: Boosting Multidisciplinary Innovation through Design-driven Approach.” 21st DMI: Academic Design Management Conference, Next Wave, Ravensbourne University, London, UK, August 1–2. https://www.dmi.org/page/ADMC2018Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K. 2019. “Renewing Technology-driven Materials Research through an Experimental Co-design Approach.” Design Journal 22 (sup 1): 1775–1785. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1594939.
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K., M. Tanttu, and C. Kohtala 2017. “Outside the “Comfort Zone”, Designing the Unknown in a Multidisciplinary Setting.” Proceedings of the 12th EAD Conference Sapienza University of Rome, Italy, April 12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki, K., P. Kääriäinen, and C. Groth. 2018. “NEW SILK: Studying Experimental Touchpoints between Material Science, Synthetic Biology, Design and Art.” Temes De Disseny Journal 34.
   Google Scholar
• Nimkulrat, N., and C. Groth 2018. “Introduction: Experiential Knowledge in Collaborative Interdisciplinary Design Research.” Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference, University of Limerick, Ireland, June 25–28, 1548–1550.
   Google Scholar
• Nimkulrat, N., K. Kuusk, J. Valle Noronha, C. Groth, and O. Tomico 2019. Editorial introduction of the Proceedings of the International Conference 2019 of the DRS Special Interest Group on Experiential Knowledge. Tallinn, Estonia, September 23–24. 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Peralta, C., and J. Moultrie 2010. “Collaboration between Designers and Scientists in the Context of Scientific Research: A Literature Review.” Proceedings of the International design conference - Design 2010, Dubrovnik - Croatia, May 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pirinen, A. 2016. “The Barriers and Enablers of Co-design for Services.” International Journal of Design 10 (3): 27−42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Refsum Jensenius, A. 2016. “Research blog.” Accessed 20 March 2020. http://www.arj.no/tag/interdisciplinary
   Google Scholar
• Rillig, M. C., K. Bonneval, and J. Lehmann. 2019. “Sounds of Soil: A New World of Interactions under Our Feet?” Soil Systems 3: 45. doi:10.3390/soilsystems3030045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5e18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., Ed. 2006. Processes of Inquiry. Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, M., A. Carnie, and A. Wright. 2017. “Messy Entanglements: Research Assemblages in Heart Transplantation Discourses and Practices.” Medical Humanities 44: 46–54. doi:10.1136/medhum-2017-011212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg, A. 2018. “Transdisciplinary PhDs in the Making Disciplines.” Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference, June 25–28. Catalyst: University of Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Stember, M. 1991. “Advancing the Social Sciences through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise.” The Social Science Journal 28 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaage, S. 2015. “Vaage, on Cultures and Artscience.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (1): 3–11. doi:10.5324/njsts.v3i1.2152.
   Google Scholar
• Zeisel, J. 2006. Inquiry by Design: Environment/behaviour/neuroscience in Architecture, Interiors, Landscape, and Planning. New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1981).
   Google Scholar