Unboxing empathy: reflecting on architectural design for maternal health

References

• 4th Wheel Social Impact. 2019. Evaluation Report Lab.Our Ward Project, Odisha. Mumbai: 4th Wheel Social Impact.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2015. “Being Awake to Ma: Designing in Between-Ness as a Way of Becoming With.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 262–274.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., P. Hagen, and D. Whaanga-Schollum. 2019. “Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-Designing with Indigenous People.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., and J. Yee. 2016. “Seeking Stronger Plurality: Intimacy and Integrity in Designing for Social Innovation.” In Proceedings of Cumulus Hong Kong 2016, edited by C. Kung, A. Lam, and Y. Lee, 173–180. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Design Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Akoglu, C., and K. Dankl. 2019. “Co-Creation for Empathy and Mutual Learning: A Framework for Design in Health and Social Care.” CoDesign. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1633358.
   Google Scholar
• Battarbee, K. 2003. “Stories as Shortcuts to Meaning.” In Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design, edited by I. Koskinen, K. Battarbee, and T. Mattelmäki, 107–118. Helsinki: IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, R., and L. van Schaik. 2013. “What If Design Matters?” In Design Research in Architecture, edited by M. Fraser, 53–69. Dorchester: Dorset Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J. 2003. “Empathic Design: Informed and Inspired by Other People’s Experience.” In Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design, edited by I. Koskinen, K. Battarbee, and T. Mattelmäki, 51–59. Helsinki: IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. 2003. “Scandinavian Approaches to Participatory Design.” International Journal of Engineering Education 19 (1): 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Heidi Paavilainen, H., P. Ahde-Deal, and I. Koskinen. 2017. “Dwelling with Design.” The Design Journal 20 (1): 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Hollan, D. 2017. “Empathy across Cultures.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, edited by H. Maibom, 341–352. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., and E. B.-N. Sanders. 2012. “Fusion of Horizons: Codesigning with Cambodian Children Who Have Prosthetic Legs, Using Generative Design Tools.” CoDesign 8 (1): 43–79.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., E. B.-N. Sanders, and M. Steinert. 2012. “Participatory Design with Marginalized People in Developing Countries: Challenges and Opportunities Experienced in a Field Study in Cambodia.” International Journal of Design 6 (2): 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kasulis, T. 2002. Intimacy or Integrity: Philosophical and Cultural Difference. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz, M., and R. Maze. 2013. “Design and Dissensus: Framing and Staging Participation in Design Research.” Design Philosophy Papers 11 (1): 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I. 2003. Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design, edited by I. Koskinen, K. Battarbee, and T. Mattelmäki., 7–10. Helsinki: IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., and K. Battarbee. 2003. “Introduction to User Experience and Empathic Design.” In Empathic Design: User Experience in Product Design, edited by I. Koskinen, K. Battarbee, and T. Mattelmäki, 37–50. Helsinki: IT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., and J. F. Rayport. 1997. “Spark Innovation to Empathic Design.” Harvard Business Review 1997 (November–December): 102–113.
   Google Scholar
• Maaloe, N., N. Housseine, I. C. Bygbjerg, T. Meguid, R. S. Khamis, A. G. Mohamed, B. Bruun Nielsen, and J. van Roosmalen. 2016. “Stillbirths and Quality of Care during Labour at the Low Resource Referral Hospital of Zanzibar: A Case-Control Study.” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 16 (351): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Maibom, H. 2017. “Introduction to Philosophy of Empathy.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, edited by H. Maibom, 1–10. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M., and N. Nimkulrat 2011. “Reflection and Documentation in Practice-led Design Research” Proceedings of Nordic Design Research Conference. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T. 2005. “Applying Probes – From Inspirational Notes to Collaborative Insights.” CoDesign 1 (2): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T. 2006. Design Probes. Helsinki: University of Art and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T., K. Vaajakallio, and I. Koskinen. 2014. “What Happened to Empathic Design?” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Design Issues 30: 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, T. 2016. “(Re)humanising Health Care – Placing Dignity and Agency of the Patient at the Centre.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 34 (1): 60–64.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, T., and C. Mgbako 2011. “The Architecture of Maternal Death.” [Accessed 12 May 2019]. https://rewire.news/article/2011/04/04/architecture-maternal-death/
   Google Scholar
• Morton, A. 2017. “Empathy and Imagination.” In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy, edited by H. Maibom, 180–189. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pallasmaa, J. 2015. “Empathic and Embodied Imagination: Intuiting Experience and Life in Architecture.” In Architecture and Empathy, edited by P. Tidwell, 4–18. Helsinki: Tapio Wirkkala Rut Bryk Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. 1961. On Becoming A Person: A Therapist’s View on Psychotherapy. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., E. Brandt, and T. Binder. 2010. “A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, edited by T. Robertson, K. Bodker, T. Bratteteig, and D. Loi, 95–198. Sydney: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-Designing to Collective Dreaming: Three Slices in Time.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Smeenk, W., J. Sturm, and B. Eggen. 2018. “Empathic Handover: How Would You Feel? Handing over Dementia Experiences and Feelings in Empathic Co-Design.” CoDesign 14 (4): 259–274.
   Google Scholar
• Smeenk, W., J. Sturm, J. Terken, and B. Eggen. 2018. “A Systematic Validation of the Empathic Handover Approach Guided by Five Factors that Foster Empathy in Design.” CoDesign 1 (21): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Smeenk, W., O. Tomico, and K. van Turnhout. 2016. “A Systematic Analysis of Mixed Perspectives in Empathic Design: Not One Perspective Encompasses All.” International Journal of Design 10 (2): 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Vaajakallio, K., and T. Mattelmäki. 2014. “Design Games in Codesign: As a Tool, a Mindset and a Structure.” CoDesign 10 (1): 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruff Smith, D. 2013. “Phenomenology”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [Accessed on 24 June 2020]. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/
   Google Scholar