Exploring how junior design professionals cope with and learn from value-based conflicts

References

• Ahmed, S., K. Wallace, and L. Blessing. 2003. “Understanding the Differences between How Novice and Experienced Designers Approach Design Tasks.” Research in Engineering Design 14 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. 1957. Personality and Organization: The Conflict between System and the Individual. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Approach. Reading: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Baha, E., G. Dawdy, N. Sturkenboom, R. Price, and D. Snelders. 2018. “Good Design-Driven Innovation.” In Proceedings of DRS 2018, edited by C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, and E. Bohemia, 98–111. London: Design Research Society. doi:10.21606/dma.2017.648.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., T. C. Ormerod, and N. J. Morley. 2004. “Spontaneous Analogising in Engineering Design: A Comparative Analysis of Experts and Novices.” Design Studies 25 (5): 495–508. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Barki, H., and J. Hartwick. 2004. “Conceptualizing the Construct of Interpersonal Conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management 15 (3): 216–244.
   Google Scholar
• Boradkar, P. 2010. Designing Things: A Critical Introduction to the Culture of Objects. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. 2002. “A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development.” Organization Science 13 (4): 355–457. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., A. Dong, and K. Maton. 2009. “Legitimating Design: A Sociology of Knowledge Account of the Field.” Design Studies 30 (5): 483–502. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H., and G. Goldschmidt. 1999. “Expertise and the Use of Visual Analogy: Implications for Design Education.” Design Studies 20 (2): 153–175. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, P. G. 1997. “Values in Health Care Professional Socialization: Implications for Geriatric Education in Interdisciplinary Teamwork.” The Gerontologist 37 (4): 441–451. doi:10.1080/13561820600916717.
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., A. F. Blackwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2006. “Graphic Elicitation: Using Research Diagrams as Interview Stimuli.” Qualitative Research 6 (3): 341–366. doi:10.1177/1468794106065007.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N., and A. Clayburn Cross. 1996. “Winning by Design: The Methods of Gordon Murray, Racing Car Designer.” Design Studies 17 (1): 91–107. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(95)00027-O.
   Google Scholar
• de Dreu, C. K. 2006. “When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams.” Journal of Management 32 (1): 83–107. doi:10.1177/0149206305277795.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, G., L. Huberts, and R. Smulders. 2016. “Coping With Public Value Conflicts.” Administration & Society 48 (9): 1101–1127. doi:10.1177/0095399714532273.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B., and T. Dalmau. 2000. “Argyris and Schön: Some Elements of Their Model.” Action Research, January 6. Accessed 11 September 2020 http://www.aral.com.au/resources/argyris2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Farh, J.-L., C. Lee, and C. I. C. Farh. 2010. “Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When.” Journal of Applied Psychology 95 (6): 1173.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., P. H. Kahn Jr, and A. Borning. 2006. “Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems.” Human-Computer Interaction in Management Information Systems: Foundations 5: 348–372.
   Google Scholar
• Frydenberg, E. 2017. Coping and the Challenge of Resilience. London: Macmillan Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and J. Holton. 2004. “Remodeling Grounded Theory.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5: 2. doi:10.17169/fqs-5.2.607.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, O. S., K. Halskov, and T. W. Leong. 2012. “Values-Led Participatory Design.” CoDesign 8 (2–3): 87–103.
   Google Scholar
• JafariNaimi, N., L. Nathan, and I. Hargraves. 2015. “Values as Hypotheses: Design, Inquiry, and the Service of Values.” Design Issues 31 (4): 91–104. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00354.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., M. Funk, S. Wensveen, M. Verkerk, and M. Rauterberg. 2019. “HuValue: A Tool to Support Design Students in considering Human Values in Their Design.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09527-3
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., and E. Y.-L. Do. 2009. “The Mechanisms of Value Transfer in Design Meetings.” Design Studies 30 (2): 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., and A. Oak. 2018. “Cracking Open Co-Creation: Categories, Stories, and Value Tension in a Collaborative Design Process.” Design Studies 57: 93–111. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn Fitzpatrick, R. 2007. “A Literature Review Exploring Values Alignment as A Proactive Approach to Conflict Management.” International Journal of Conflict Management 18 (3): 280–305. doi:10.1108/10444060710826007.
   Google Scholar
• Manders-Huits, N. 2011. “What Values in Design? The Challenge of Incorporating Moral Values into Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2): 271–287. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9198-2.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2012. “Accommodating Disagreement: A Study of Effective Design Collaboration.” Design Studies 33 (1): 44–63. doi:10.1201/b15530.
   Google Scholar
• McDonnell, J. 2016. “Scaffolding Practices: A Study of Design Practitioner Engagement in Design Education.” Design Studies 45: 9–29. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1994. Oneself as Another. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2012. Convivial Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315237473.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., and F. M. Sortheix. 2018. “Values and Subjective Well-Being.” In Handbook of Well-Being. edited by E. Diener, S. Oishi, and L. Tay, 1–25. Salt Lake City, UT: Noba Scholar. http://www.nobascholar.com/chapters/51
   Google Scholar
• Shilton, K., J. A. Koepfler, and K. R. Fleischmann. 2013. “Charting Sociotechnical Dimensions of Values for Design Research.” The Information Society 29: 259–271. doi:10.1080/01972243.2013.825357.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., and M. J. Zimmer-Gembeck. 2016. The Development of Coping: Stress, Neurophysiology, Social Relationships, and Resilience during Childhood and Adolescence. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41740-0.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, M. W., and A. Hutchinson. 2016. “Uncertainty, Reflection, and Designer Identity Development.” Design Studies 42: 86–109. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I. 2009. “Values in Engineering Design”. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, edited by A. Meijers Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 9, 973–1006. North Holland: Elsevier
   Google Scholar
• van Onselen, L., and R. Valkenburg. 2015. “Personal Values as a Catalyst for Meaningful Innovations: Supporting Young Designers in Collaborative Practice.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED15), edited by C. Weber, S. Husung, G. Cascini, M. Cantamessa, D. Marjanovic, and M. Bordegoni, 547–556. Glasgow: Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Zelenko, O., and E. Felton. 2013. “Framing Design and Ethics.” In Design and Ethics: Reflections on Practice, edited by E. Felton, O. Zelenko, and S. Vaughan, 3–9. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zupan, K. 2012. “Values, Conflicts and Value Conflict Resolution.” PhD diss, University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar