Co-creation applied to public policy: a case study on collaborative policies for the platform economy in the city of Barcelona

References

• Allegretti, G., M. Secchi, and A. Tang. 2016. “Hybrid Scales of Citizen Engagement: How Technological Integration Can Scale-up Participatory Processes?” In The Geopolitics of Cities: Old Challenges, New Issues, edited by R. Balbim, 211–242. Brasilia: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Aragón, P., A. Kaltenbrunner, A. Calleja-López, A. Pereira, A. Monterde, X. E. Barandiaran, and V. Gómez September 2017. “Deliberative Platform Design: The Case Study of the Online Discussions in Decidim Barcelona.” In International Conference on Social Informatics, edited by G. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi, and T. Yasseri, 277–287. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bassetti, C., M. Sciannamblo, P. Lyle, M. Teli, S. De Paoli, and A. De Angeli. 2019. “Co-designing for Common Values: Creating Hybrid Spaces to Nurture Autonomous Cooperation.” CoDesign 15 (3): 256–271. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1637897.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., Y. Salazar, and I. Bianchi. 2020. “Urban Governance and Political Change under a Radical Left Government: The Case of Barcelona.” Journal of Urban Affairs 42 (1): 18–38. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1559648.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, A., H. Dinkel, M. Corpas, J. C. Fuller, L. Rubinat, D. P. Devos and M. Sharan. 2015. “Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference.” PLOS Computational Biology 11 (1): e1003905. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003905.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., and D. F. Campbell. 2012. Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2004. “Informationalism, Networks, and the Network Society: A Theoretical Blueprint.” In The Network Society: A Cross-cultural Perspective, edited by M. Castells, 3–45. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H. T., and P. H. Rossi. 1980. “The Multi-goal, Theory-driven Approach to Evaluation: A Model Linking Basic and Applied Social Science.” Social Forces 59 (1): 106–122. doi:10.2307/2577835.
   Google Scholar
• Codagnone, C., and B. Martens. 2016. Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/01. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Codagnone, C., F. Biagi, and F. Abadie. 2016. The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the ‘Sharing Economy’. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 27914 EN. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, N. M., and J. Infranca. 2016. “The Sharing Economy as an Urban Phenomenon.” Yale Law & Policy Review 34 (2): 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1995. “The Triple Helix–university-industry-government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development.” EASST Review 14 (1): 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, G., and L. Malmborg September 2018. “Quadruple Helix Model Organisation and Tensions in Participatory Design Teams.” In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 376–384. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster Morell, M. 2011. “Rethinking Government in the Light of the Emerging Organisational Principles of Online Collective Action.” European Journal of ePractice (12): 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster Morell, M. 2018. “Introduction.” In Sharing Cities. A Worldwide Cities Overview on Platform Economy Policies with A Focus on Barcelona, edited by M. Fuster Morell, 23–30. Barcelona: UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Fuster Morell, M., and R. Espelt. 2019. “A Framework to Assess the Sustainability of Platform Economy: The Case of Barcelona Ecosystem.” Sustainability 11 (22): 6450. doi:10.3390/su11226450.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapati, S., and C. G. Reddick. 2018. “Prospects and Challenges of Sharing Economy for the Public Sector.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (1): 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Garriga, M., D. Gómez-Fontanills, E. Senabre Hidalgo, and M. Fuster Morell. 2018. “Collaborative Online Writing and Techno-social Communities of Practice around the Commons: The Case of Teixidora.net in Barcelona.” Journal of Peer Production 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hanington, B., and B. Martin. 2012. Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., and S. Lee. 2018. “Adaptive Governance and Decentralization: Evidence from Regulation of the Sharing Economy in Multi-level Governance.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (2): 299–305. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.002.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, A., and K. Grayson. 2008. “The Intersecting Roles of Consumer and Producer: A Critical Perspective on Co‐production, Co-creation and Prosumption.” Sociology Compass 2(3): 963–980. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00112.x.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Google Scholar
• Iaione, C. 2016. “The CO‐City: Sharing, Collaborating, Cooperating, and Commoning in the City. American.” Journal of Economics and Sociology 75 (2): 415–455. doi:10.1111/ajes.12145.
   Google Scholar
• Kaaronen, R. 2016. Scientific Support for Sustainable Development Policies: A Typology of Science Policy Interfaces with Case Studies. Helsinki: Sitra.
   Google Scholar
• Kaethler, M., S. De Blust, and T. Devos. 2017. “Ambiguity as Agency: Critical Opportunists in the Neoliberal City.” CoDesign 13 (3): 175–186. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355002.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., and J. Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policy-making.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226. doi:10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and A. Seravalli. 2019. “The Breakdown of the Municipality as Caring Platform: Lessons for Co-design and Co-learning in the Age of Platform Capitalism.” CoDesign 15 (3): 192–211. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1631354.
   Google Scholar
• Lodato, T., and C. DiSalvo August 2018. “Institutional Constraints: The Forms and Limits of Participatory Design in the Public Realm.” In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1, Article No. 5. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. P., P. Marques-Gou, and A. Simon-Villar. 2010. “Gauging Readiness for the Quadruple Helix: A Study of 16 European Organizations.” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 1 (3): 173–190. doi:10.1007/s13132-010-0012-9.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2016. “From Market Fixing to Market-creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy.” Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–156. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, M., E. Blomkamp, and J. M. Lewis. 2018. “The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 249–267. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., and J. Luetjens. 2016. “Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes: Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 391–402. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12211.
   Google Scholar
• Osita, I. C., I. R. Onyebuchi, and J. Nzekwe. 2014. “Organization’s Stability and Productivity: The Role of SWOT Analysis an Acronym for Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats. International.” Journal of Innovative and Applied Research 2 (9): 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pais, I., and G. Provasi. 2015. “Sharing Economy: A Step Towards the Re-embeddedness of the Economy?” Stato E Mercato 35 (3): 347–378.
   Google Scholar
• Peris-Ortiz, M., J. J. Ferreira, L. Farinha, and N. O. Fernandes. 2016. “Introduction to Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness.” In Multiple Helix Ecosystems for Sustainable Competitiveness, edited by M. Peris-Ortiz, J. J. Ferreira, L. Farinha, and N. O. Fernandes, 1–13. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poderi, G. 2019. “Sustaining Platforms as Commons: Perspectives on Participation, Infrastructure, and Governance.” CoDesign 15 (3): 243–255. doi:10.1080/15710882.2019.1631351.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, M., A. Tregner-Mlinaric, R. Popper, G. Velasco, M. Schwarz-Woelzl, S. Van Eynde, … R. Hölsgens. 2017. “Sustainable Innovation Policy Advice Using a Quadruple Helix Approach to “Innovations” Mapping.” In Sustainable Innovation Policy Advice, 28–49. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Pradel, M., M. G. Cabeza, and S. E. Anglada. 2013. “Theorizing Multi-level Governance in Social Innovation Dynamics.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch, 155–168. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, V., and K. Ozcan. 2018. “What Is Co-creation? An Interactional Creation Framework and Its Implications for Value Creation.” Journal of Business Research 84: 196–205. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.027.
   Google Scholar
• Ranchordás, S. 2015. “Does Sharing Mean Caring: Regulating Innovation in the Sharing Economy.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 16: 413.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, N., and M. Fuster Morell. 2018. “Public Innovation in Platform Economy Policies: Platforms, Policy Labs, and Challenges.” In Sharing Cities. A Worldwide Cities Overview on Platform Economy Policies with A Focus on Barcelona, edited by M. Fuster Morell, 43–72. Barcelona: UOC.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and G. Simons December 2009. A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design. Open Source Business Resource. http://timreview.ca/article/310
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N. 2002. “From User-centered to Participatory Design Approaches.” In Design and the Social Sciences, edited by J. Frascara, 18–25. London: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkki, S., R. Tinch, J. Niemelä, U. Heink, K. Waylen, J. Timaeus, J. Young, A. Watt, C. Neßhöver, and S. van den Hove. 2015. “Adding ‘Iterativity’ to the Credibility, Relevance, Legitimacy: A Novel Scheme to Highlight Dynamic Aspects of Science–policy Interfaces.” Environmental Science & Policy 54: 505–512. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.02.016.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, T. 2016. Platform Cooperativism. Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy. New York, NY: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Senabre Hidalgo, E. October 2018. Dotmocracy and Planning Poker for Uncertainty Management in Collaborative Research: Two Examples of Co-creation Techniques Derived from Digital Culture. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, 833–839. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Spada, P., and G. Allegretti. 2017. “Integrating Multiple Channels of Engagement in Democratic Innovations: Opportunities and Challenges.” In Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media, edited by M. Adria and Y. Mao, 20–37. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2005. “The Methodology of Participatory Design.” Technical Communication 52 (2): 163–174.
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. 2016. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. D., and E. E. Marsh. 2006. “Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology.” Library Trends 55 (1): 22–45. doi:10.1353/lib.2006.0053.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M., I. Fazey, and D. Hemment. 2016. Recommendations and Guidelines for Engaging Communities with Agencies and Policy Bodies Using Powerful Deliberate Practices. Amsterdam: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Zurbriggen, C., and M. G. Lago. 2014. “Innovación Y Co-creación. Nuevos Desafíos Para Las Políticas Públicas.” Revista De Gestión Pública 3 (2): 329–361. doi:10.22370/rgp.2014.3.2.2245.
   Google Scholar