The imagination and public participation: a Deweyan perspective on the potential of design innovation and participatory design in policy-making

References

• Bason, C. 2016. Design for Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, E. 2002. “P for Political: Participation Is Not Enough.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14 (1): 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., E. Brandt, P. Ehn, and J. Halse. 2015. “Democratic Design Experiments: Between Parliament and Laboratory.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 152–165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081248.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary PD Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165.
   Google Scholar
• Brian, D. 2020b. “From Making Things Public to the Design of Creative Democracy.” CoDesign 16 (2): 97–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1555260.
   Google Scholar
• Bua, A., and O. Escobar. 2018. “Participatory-deliberative Processes and Public Policy Agendas: Lessons for Policy and Practice.” Policy Design and Practice 1 (2): 126–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1469242.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2017. “Evidence-based Best Practice Is More Political than It Looks: A Case Study of the “Scottish Approach”.” Evidence & Policy 13 (3): 499–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14609261565901.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2021. “Would Scotland’s Policymaking and Political Structures Change with Independence?” In Scotland’s New Choice: Independence after Brexit, edited by E. Hepburn, M. Keating, and N. McEwen, 127–133. Edinburgh: Centre on Constitutional Change.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., and E. S. Denny. 2020. Why Isn’t Government Policy More Preventive? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., (LW 1-14). 1981-1991. The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, Vol. 14. edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, B. 2020a. Dewey and Design: A Pragmatist Perspective for Design Research. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. 2017. “Learning in PD as I Found It (1970–2015).” In PD for Learning: Perspectives from Practice and Research, edited by B. DiSalvo, J. Yip, E. Bonsignore, and C. DiSalvo, 7–21. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. C., V. Fejszes, and T. Mariola. 2019. “The Community Empowerment Act and Localism under Devolution in Scotland: The Perspective of Multiple Stakeholders in a Council Ward.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 32 (3): 302–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2018-0080.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O., and S. Elstub. 2017. “Deliberative Innovations: Using ‘Mini-publics’ to Improve Participation and Deliberation at the Scottish Parliament.” Accessed 16 June 2021. https://test123582.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/deliberativeinnovations-researchpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garven, F., J. McLean, and L. Pattoni. 2016. Asset-Based Approaches: Their Rise, Role and Reality. London: Dunedin Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, J., E. Brandt, B. Clarke, and T. Binder, Eds. 2010. Rehearsing the Future. Copenhagen: Danish Design School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory 2 (2): 101–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L., and J. Jocelyn Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policy-making.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003.
   Google Scholar
• Kyng, M. 2010. “Bridging the Gap between Politics and Techniques: On the Next Practices of Participatory Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22 (1): 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public”. In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 14–41. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, L., and A. Kearns. 2010. ““Community Empowerment” in the Context of the Glasgow Housing Stock Transfer.” Urban Studies 47 (7): 1459–1478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009353619.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A. 2016. Designing Publics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marc, S. 2015. “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Full: Exploring the Ethics in Design Practices.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (3): 389–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914547645.
   Google Scholar
• McHattie, L.-S., K. Champion, and C. Broadley. 2018. “Craft, Textiles, and Cultural Assets in the Northern Isles: Innovation from Tradition in the Shetland Islands.” Island Studies Journal 13 (2): 39–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.47.
   Google Scholar
• McHattie, L.-S., K. Champion, and M. Johnson. 2019. “Crafting the Local: The Lived Experience of Craft Production in the Northern Isles of Scotland.” Cultural Trends 28 (4): 305–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2019.1644791.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, C., A. Steiner, and C. H. O’Connor. 2020. “Participation Requests: Evaluation of Part 3 of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.” Accessed 13 January 2021. https://tinyurl.com/y8fjw833
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, S., and P. Karl. 2021. “Dissonance and Diplomacy: Coordination of Conflicting Values in Urban Co-design.” CoDesign 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1968441.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, J. 2016. John Dewey: The Global Public and Its Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pappas, G. F. 2008. John Dewey's Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre Johnson, M., L.-S. McHattie, and K. Champion. 2019. “Design Innovation for Creative Growth: Modelling Relational Exchange to Support and Evaluate Creative Enterprise in the Scottish Highlands and Islands.” Artifact: Journal of Design Practice 6 (1–2): 10–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00010_1.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2015. The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2017. “The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act: Summary.” Accessed 12 December 2020. https://tinyurl.com/y7ghxfu3
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2019. Scotland’s Open Government Action Plan Commitments in Detail. Edinburgh: Scottish Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Robertson, eds. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Telier, A. (Thomas Binder, Giorgio De Michelis, Pelle Ehn, Giulio Jacucci, Per Linde and Ina Wagner). 2011. Design Things. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, C. 2019. “From the Director”. In UTS Design Innovation Research Centre: Annual Review 2018–2019, edited by C. Tonkinwise. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar