Plant Hotels: designing the imaginary foundations of communities

References

• Baumgartner, M. P. 1988. The Moral Order of a Suburb. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1991. Outsiders. Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. 1993. Discreet Indiscretions. The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Paris: La presses du réel.
   Google Scholar
• Button, G., and W. Sharrock. 1999. “The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work.” Social Studies of Science 28: 73–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028001003.
   Google Scholar
• Buur, J., and H. Larsen. 2010. “The Quality of Conversations in Participatory Innovation.” CoDesign 6: 121–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2010.533185.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. 2017. “Lay Designers. Grassroots Innovation for Appropriate Change.” Design Issues 33: 30–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00424.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D.-S., L.-L. Cheng, C. Hummels, and I. Koskinen. 2016. “Social Design: An Introduction.” International Journal of Design 10: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A. 2004. “Design in the Absence of Practice: Breaching Experiments.” In Proceedings of DIS 2004, 59–84. Cambridge, MA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., and G. Hush. 2016. “Utopian, Molecular and Sociological Social Design.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Jantzer Cinnamon, L., and L. S. Weinstein. 2013. “Social Design and Neocolonialism.” Design and Culture 6: 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. P. 2016. Mapping Design Things. Making Design Explicit in the Discourse of Change. Glasgow: Glasgow School of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. 2013. “From Design Culture to Design Activism.” Design and Culture 5: 215–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370814.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I. 2016. “Agonistic, Convivial, and Conceptual Aesthetics in New Social Design.” Design Issues 32 (3): 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kurvinen, E., K. Battarbee, and I. Koskinen. 2008. “Prototyping Social Interaction.” Design Issues 21: 46–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.46.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. 2001. Interacting with Babylon 5. Fan Performances in a Media Universe. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, E. M. 1951. “Primary and Secondary Deviation.” In Social Pathology, edited by E. M. Lemert, 603–607. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign 7: 199–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V. 2015. “Social Design: From Utopia to the Good Society.” In Design for the Good Society, edited by M. Bruinsma and Z. van Ida, 28–42. Utrecht: Stichting Utrecht Biennale.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, T. 2013. “The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design between Art and Politics.” Design Issues 29: 38–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00195.
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, A. ed. 2007. Creative Communities. People Inventing Sustainable Ways of Living. Milan: Edizioni Polidesign.
   Google Scholar
• Narotzky, V. 2000. “A Different and New Refinement. Design in Barcelona, 1960-1990.” Journal of Design History 13: 227–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/13.3.227.
   Google Scholar
• Pelle, E., E. M. Nilsson, and R. Topgaard, eds. 2015. Making Futures. Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selloni, D. 2017. Codesign for Public-Interest Services. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E. 2007. “Design for the Other 90%.” New York: Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum, Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., and F. W. Znaniecki. 1918-1920. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press and Boston: Gorham Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, C. 2011. “A Taste for Practices: Unrepressing Style in Design Thinking.” Design Studies 32: 533–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, E., and R. H. Warland. 1983. “Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident. Activists and Free Riders in the TMI Area.” American Sociological Review 48: 764–780. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095324.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M. 2019. On Agonism and Design. Trento: Department of Information and Communication Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. 2017. Bicycles and Plants: Designing for Conviviality and Meaningful Social Relations through Collaborative Services. Espoo: Aalto ARTS.
   Google Scholar