Reimagining co-design on Country as a relational and transformational practice

References

• Aho, N. 2016. “TONO: What Is Our Tikanga for Aotearoa Co-design? What Does a Tikanga Māori Co-Design/Social Innovation Practice Like?” https://ngaaho.maori.nz/page.php?m=187
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., and A. Light. 2020. “Readiness for Contingency: Punctuation, Poise, and Co-design.” Co-Design: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts 16 (1): 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., D. Evans, S. Keen, F. McMillan, M. McMillan, and P. West. 2017. “Designing Digital and Creative Scaffolds to Strengthen Indigenous Nations: Being Wiradjuri by Practising Sovereignty.” Journal of Digital Creativity, (Special Issue on Digital Citizenship) 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2017.1291525.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., P. Hagen, and D. Whaanga-schollum. 2019. “Problematizing Replicable Design to Practice Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-designing with Indigenous People.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 59–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571306.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y. 2021. “Archipelagos of Designing through Ko-ontological Encounters.” In Arts-Based Methods for Decolonising Participatory Research, edited by T. Seppälä, M. Sarantou, and S. Miettinen, 101–122, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Albarrán González, D. 2020. Towards a Buen Vivir-centric Design: Decolonising Artisanal Design with Mayan Weavers from the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Auckland University of Technology. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/13492
   Google Scholar
• Austin-Broos, D. J. 2009. Arrernte Present, Arrernte Past: Invasion, Violence, and Imagination in Indigenous Central Australia. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlo, S., W. B. E Boyd, M. Hughes, S. Wilson, and A. Pelizzon. 2021. “Yarning as Protected Space: Relational Accountability in Research.” AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 7 (1): 1177180120986151.
   Google Scholar
• Beals, F., J. Kidman, and H. Funaki. 2019. “Insider and Outsider Research: Negotiating Self at the Edge of the Emic/etic Divide.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (6).
   Google Scholar
• Chilisa, B. 2011. Indigenous Research Methodologies. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, M., Y. Guyula, K. Gotha, and D. Gurruwiwi. 2010. “The Ethics of Teaching from Country.” Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy and the Making of Worlds. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. 2016. “Moving Deeper into Difference – Developing Meaningful and Effective Pathways into Teacher Education for Indigenous Adults from Remote Communities.” Doctoral dissertation, Charles Darwin University, Darwin. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/83085054.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez Ibinarriaga, D. 2020. “Critical Co-design Methodology: Privileging Indigenous Knowledges and Biocultural Diversity (Australia/Mexico).” PhD Thesis, Deakin University. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30136596
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1993. “The Temporality of the Landscape.” World Archaeology 25: 152–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1993.9980235.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R., M. Kelly, J. Greenaway, and B. Martin. 2018. International Indigenous Design Charter. Geelong, Australia. https://www.ico-d.org/database/files/library/International_IDC_book_small_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kral, I. 2000. “The socio-historical development of literacy in Arrernte: A case study of writing in an Aboriginal language and the implications for current vernacular literacy practices.” Unpublished Masters thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from Unpublished Masters thesis. https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/38955
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, W. 2007. “Delinking: The Rhetoric of Modernity, the Logic of Coloniality and the Grammar of De-coloniality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2–3): 449–514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. 2007. “Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality: Working through Dangers Seen, Unseen, and Unforeseen.” Educational Researcher 36 (7): 388–400. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07309471.
   Google Scholar
• Moreton-Robinson, A. 2015. The White Possessive: Property, Power and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis, US: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Relative Creative. n.d. https://relativecreative.com.au/
   Google Scholar
• Rodil, K., H. Winschiers-Theophilus, T. I. Asino, and Z. Tariq, eds. 2019. “Indigenous Knowledge and Practices Contributing to New Approaches in Learning/educational Technologies.” Special Issue. International Journal on Interaction Design & Architecture(S) 41: 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., D. Abdulla, A. Ansari, E. Canlı, M. Keshavarz, M. Kiem, L. P. Martins, and J. S. Vieira de Oliveira P. 2018. “What Is at Stake with Decolonizing Design? A Roundtable.” Design and Culture 10 (1): 81–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1434368.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T. 2018. “Mapping Indigenous Futures: Decolonising Techno-Colonising Designs.” Strategic Design Research Journal 11 (August): 79–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2018.112.04.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, N. 2011. “Indigenous Knowledge and Respectful Design: An Evidence-Based Approach.” Design Issues 27 (4): 68–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00106.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonising methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2005. “Building a Research Agenda for Indigenous Epistemologies and Education.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 36 (1): 93–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.093.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonising Methodologies. London and New York: Zed Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C., H. Winschiers-Theophilus, D. Loi, A. P. Kambung, M. S. Muudeni, and R. de Paula. 2020. “Decolonising Participatory Design Practices: Towards Participations Otherwise.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020-Participation (s) Otherwise-Volume 2 Manizales Colombia, 206–208.
   Google Scholar
• St John, N. 2018. Desert drawing: from pigment to (Apple) pencil. Proceedings of DRS2018: Catalyst. Design Research Society, 2018 Conference in Limerick, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• St John, N. 2020. “Ntaria Design:A Western Arrarnta Imagining of Digital Drawing and Communication Design.” PhD Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology PhD Thesis, Melbourne. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/454995
   Google Scholar
• St John, N., and S. Edwards-Vandenhoek. 2021. “Learning Together on Country: Reimagining Design Education in Australia.” Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.1907331.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2002. “Located Accountabilities in Technology Production.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 12 (2): 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, M. B., S. Rojas-Lizana, L. X. Dutra, and A. V. M. Levu. 2020. “Decolonial Design in Practice: Designing Meaningful and Transformative Science Communications for Navakavu, Fiji.” Design and Culture 12 (2): 141–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1724479.
   Google Scholar
• Uncle Moran, C., U. G. Harrington, and N. Sheehan. 2018. “On Country Learning.” Design and Culture 10 (1): 71–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2018.1430996.
   Google Scholar
• West, P. 2020. “Designing in Response to Indigenous Sovereignties Akama, Y., Fennessy, L., Harrington, S., and Farago, A. eds .” In ServDes.2020 - Tensions, Paradoxes, Plurality. Melbourne, Australia: Linköping University Electronic Press 66–79.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2001. “What Is an Indigenous Research Methodology?” Canadian Journal of Native Education 25 (2): 175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2008. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. New York: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar