Beyond polarisation: reimagining communities through the imperfect act of ontologising

References

• Anonymous.
   Google Scholar
• Avram, G., -J. H.-J. Choi, S. De Paoli, A. Light, P. Lyle, and M. Teli. 2017. “Collaborative Economies: From Sharing to Caring.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 305–307. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Bödker, S., C. Dindler, and O. S. Iversen. 2017. “Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 26, 1-2 (April 2017) 26 (1–2): 245–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y.
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B., and L. Boelens. 2011. “Self-organisation in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning.” Urban Research and Practice 4 (2): 99–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.579767.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. 2009. “Cartography: Performative, Participatory, Political.” Progress in Human Geography 33 (6): 840–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508105000.
   Google Scholar
• De La Bellacasa, M. P. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Rynck, F., and K. Dezeure. 2009. Burgerparticipatie in Vlaamse Steden - Naar Een Innoverend Participatiebeleid. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Design for the Pluriverse. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, M., and T. J. Turner 2019. “The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research.” In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming Communities (Vienna, Austria) (C&T ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA. TU Wien: Vienna Austria. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3328320.3328398
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2003. “The Dialectic of Sustainment.” Design Philosophy Papers 1 (5): 289–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/144871303X13965299302794.
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, P., and T. Lijster. 2017. “Art and Civil Action. Cultural Organizations in the European Civil Domain.” Visual Ethnography 6: 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.12835/ve2017.2-0085.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. 2002. “A Methodology of Participatory Planning.” In Handbook of Environmental Psychology, edited by R. Bechtel and A. Churchman, 607–628. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13(3): 145–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, L., A. Light, K. Lindström, and Å. Ståhl 2019. “How Can We Come to Care in and through Design?” In Nordes 2019: Who Cares?: Proceedings of the 8th Bi-Annual Nordic Design Research Society Conference - Who Cares? Finland, Eespo, Nordic Design Research, 2019, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and M. Dodge. 2007. “Rethinking Maps.” Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 331–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077082.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhk, A., H. Heynen, L. Huybrechts, J. Schreurs, and F. Moulaert. 2019. Participatiegolven. Dialogen over Ruimte, Planning En Ontwerp in Vlaanderen En Brussel. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and P. Weibel. 2020. Critical Zones. The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and C. Miskelly. 2019. “Platforms, Scales and Networks: Meshing a Local Sustainable Sharing Economy.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 28 (3–4): 62–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09352-1.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2019. Politics of the Everyday. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 1999. “Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions.” The Sociological Review 47 (1_suppl): 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, B. 2006. “Constructing Community through Maps? Power and Praxis in Community Mapping.” The Professional Geographer 58 (4): 470–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-García, V., M. Orta-Martínez, M. Gueze, A. C. Luz, J. Paneque-Gálvez, M. J. Macía, and J. Pino; TAPS Bolivian Study Team. 2012. “Does Participatory Mapping Increase Conflicts? A Randomized Evaluation in the Bolivian Amazon.” Applied Geography 34: 650–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Storni, C., T. Binder, P. Linde, and D. Stuedahl. 2015. “”Designing Things Together: Intersections of Co-Design and Actor-Network Theory.”.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 149–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081242.
   Google Scholar
• Teli, M., M. Foth, M. Sciannamblo, I. Anastasiu Cioca, and P. Lyle 2020. “Tales of Institutioning and Commoning: Participatory Design Processes with a Strategic and Tactical Perspective.” PDC ’20: Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise, 1. Manizales, Colombia, June 15-19. Universidad de Caldas. US: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., T. Poell, and M. De Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, A. 2006. “Ontological Designing.” Design Philosophy Papers 4 (2): 69–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/144871306X13966268131514.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 2010. Rethinking the Power of Maps. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar