Being a sociable designer: reimagining the role of designers in social innovation

References

• Akama, Y., and J. Yee. 2016. “Seeking Stronger Plurality: Intimacy and Integrity in Designing for Social Innovation.” In Cumulus 2016 Conference Proceedings. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Design Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Y., P. Hagen, and D. Whaanga-Schollum. 2019. “Respectful, Reciprocal, and Relational Co-Designing with Indigenous People.” Design and Culture 11 (1): 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2019.1571303.
   Google Scholar
• Bala-Miller, P., I. Marras, and A. Zacarias. 2008. Creative Communities: Their Role and Impact on Welfare and Development, Edited by F. Jégou and E. Manzini. Milan: Edizioni POLI.design.
   Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, E., P. Ehn, and P.-A. Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., and J. Wyatt. 2010. “Design Thinking for Social Innovation.” Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter: 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, G. 2017. “Can Design Inform Effective Social Innovation?” The Design Journal 20 (6): 725–734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1370658.
   Google Scholar
• Calvo, M., and A. De Rosa. 2017. “Design for Social Sustainability. A Reflection on the Role of the Physical Realm in Facilitating Community Co-Design.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S1705–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352694.
   Google Scholar
• Catoir-Brisson, M.-J., S. Vial, M. Deni, and T. Watkin. 2016. “From the Specificity of the Project in Design to Social Innovation by Design: A Contribution.” In Proceedings of DRS 2016, Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference. Uk: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, A. 2012. “Design for Social Innovation: Emerging Principles and Approaches.” Iridescent 2 (1): 52–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19235003.2012.11428505.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council of Hong Kong. 2021. “About DCHK.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://designcouncilhk.org/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Dindler, C., and O. S. Iversen. 2014. “Relational Expertise in Participatory Design”. In PDC ’14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference, 1:41–50. Namibia: Windhoek.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., T. Lodato, L. Fries, B. Schechter, and T. Barnwell. 2011. “The Collective Articulation of Issues as Design Practice.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 185–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630475.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 1999. “Expansive Visibilization of Work: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 (1): 63–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008648532192.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, K., G. Borba, and L. Diebold. 2011. “Participatory Design as an Approach to Social Innovation.” Design Philosophy Papers 9 (3): 235–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/144871311X13968752924950.
   Google Scholar
• Gullstrom, C., and J. Kort. 2019. “Enabling Sharing and Resource Efficiency among Neighbours by Comparing Trust and Social Cohesion in Sweden and the Netherlands.” In 6th International Workshop on the Sharing Economy. Utrecht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, F. 2019. A Relational Approach to Community and Social Innovation: Practices that Make A Difference. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Council.
   Google Scholar
• Janzer, C. L., and L. S. Weinstein. 2014. “Social Design and Neocolonialism.” Design and Culture 6 (3): 327–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/175613114X14105155617429.
   Google Scholar
• Jégou, F., and E. Manzini. 2008. Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability. Milan: POLI.design.
   Google Scholar
• Kasulis, T. 2002. Intimacy or Integrity: Philosophical and Cultural Difference. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanah 2021. “Yayasan Hasanah.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://www.khazanah.com.my/our-community/yayasan-hasanah/
   Google Scholar
• King, N. 2004. “Using Templates in the Thematic Analysis of Text.” In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, edited by C. Cassell and G. Symon, 279–292. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., M. Celi, F. Rizzo, and A. Deserti. 2016. “A Case Based Discussion on the Role of Design Competences in Social Innovation”. In Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference. UK: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. 2008. “Design Participation Tactics: The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-Design Process.” CoDesign 4 (1): 31–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613.
   Google Scholar
• Light, A., and Y. Akama. 2014. “Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice.” In PDC ’14 Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers, 151–160. Namibia: Windhoek.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, A., and T. Strong. 2010. Social Constructionism: Sources and Stirrings in Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malaysian Design Council. 2021. “About Us.” Accessed 7 December 2021. http://www.mrm.gov.my/dc_aboutus.asp
   Google Scholar
• Malaysian Global Innovation and Creativity Centre. 2021. “About Us.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://www.mymagic.my/about
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2013. “Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design.” Design Issues 30 (1): 57–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meroni, A., D. Fassi, and G. Simeone. 2013. Design for Social Innovation as a Form of Designing Activism: An Action Format. Milan: Polimi DESIS.
   Google Scholar
• NIA. 2021. “Vision.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://www.nia.or.th/doveaf2lux.html
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petrella, V., J. Yee, and R. E. Clarke. 2020. “Mutuality and Reciprocity: Foregrounding Relationships in Design and Social Innovation”. In Proceedings of DRS 2020 International Conference: Synergy, 1–16. London: Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, L., A. Light, and P. Rodgers. 2014. “Empathic Negotiations through Material Culture: Co-Designing and Making Digital Exhibits.” Digital Creativity 25 (3): 269–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2014.904367.
   Google Scholar
• Reitsma, L., A. Light, T. Zaman, and P. Rodgers. 2019. “A Respectful Design Framework. Incorporating Indigenous Knowledge in the Design Process.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 1555–1570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594991.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Selloni, D., and M. Corubolo. 2017. “Design for Social Enterprises: Co-Designing an Organizational and Cultural Change.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S3005–S3019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352809.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, N. W. 2011. “Indigenous Knowledge and Respectful Design: An Evidence-Based Approach.” Design Issues 27 (4): 68–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00106.
   Google Scholar
• SIE Fund. 2021. About Social Innovation and Social Enterprise. Accessed 7 December 2021. https://www.sie.gov.hk/en/faqs/about-si-and-se.page
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1949. “The Sociology of Sociability.” American Journal of Sociology 55 (3): 254–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/220534.
   Google Scholar
• Steane, J., J. Briggs, and J. Yee. 2020. “T-Shifting Identities and Practices: Interaction Designers in the Fourth Industrial Age.” International Journal of Design 14 (3): 85–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L. 2012. “Understanding the Different Roles of the Designer in Design for Social Good. A Study of Design Methodology in the DOTT 07 (Designs of the Time 2007).” PhD diss., Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Tarbox, J. D. A. 2006. “Activity Theory: A Model for Design Research.” In Design Studies: Theory and Research in Graphic Design, edited by A. Bennett, 73–81. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thailand Creativity and Design Center. 2021. “About TCDC Resource Center: Objective and Mission.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://library.tcdc.or.th/page/about
   Google Scholar
• Think City.2021. “Our Work.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://thinkcity.com.my/our-work/
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A., and L. Gamman. 2011. “Design with Society: Why Socially Responsive Design Is Good Enough.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 217–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630477.
   Google Scholar
• Tjahja, C. 2019. “Reorienting and Sustaining Design and Social Innovation: Insights from Asia-Pacific Practices.” PhD Diss., Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP Thailand. 2018. “UNDP Teams up with Partners to Empower Young Social Innovators in Thailand.” Accessed 7 December 2021. http://www.th.undp.org/content/thailand/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2018/10/undp-teams-up-with-partners-to-empower-young-social-innovators-i.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., N. Bryan-Kinns, and J. Tie. 2016. “Using Community Engagement to Drive Co-Creation in Rural China.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, L., and R. Young. 2016. “The Role of Design as a Critical Friend to the Voluntary Community Sector.” In ServDes.2016 - Service Design Geographies Conference, 24-26 May 2016. Denmark: Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, L. 2017. “Designing Trust: The Importance of Relationships in Social Contexts.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S3096–3105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352817.
   Google Scholar
• Yayasan Hasanah.2021. “Focus Areas.” Accessed 7 December 2021. https://yayasanhasanah.org/focus-areas/
   Google Scholar
• Yee, J., E. Jefferies, and K. Michlewski. 2017. Transformations: 7 Roles to Drive Change by Design. Amsterdam: BIS.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar