Improved streambank countermeasures: the Des Moines River (USA) case study

References

• Abad, J.D., et al., 2008. Flow structure at different stages in a Meander-Bend with Bendway Weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134 (8), 1052–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, K. and Gautam, M., 2012. Evaluation of bendway weir bank stabilization techniques for stream restoration. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10 (2), 171–176.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, E.E., et al., 1995. Soil component, in USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope Profile and Watershed Model Documentation, Rep. 10, edited by D.C. Flanagan and M.A. Nearing, chap. 7, pp. 1–47, Natl. Soil Erosion Res. Lab., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agric., West Lafayette, Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 1967. Closure to “Sediment transportation mechanics: initiation of motion” by the task committee on preparation of sedimentation manual, Vito A. Vanoni, Chairman. Journal of Hydraulic Divison, ASCE, 93 (5), 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Annandale, G.W., 2006. Scour technology. Mechanics and engineering practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Civil Engineering Serieso. ISBN 0-07-144057-7; 430 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Athaullah, M., 1968. Prediction of bedforms in erodible channels. Dissertation (PhD). Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Bressan, F. and Papanicolaou, A.N., 2012. Local scour around a variably submerged barb in shallow water. In: Third international symposium on shallow flows, 4–6 June 2012, Iowa City, IA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlie, W.R., 1983. Flow depth in sand-bed channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109 (7), 959–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhu, M., 2000. Soil mechanics and foundations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 759 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.H., 1988. Fluvial processes in river engineering. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company, 432 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, M.H., 2008. Open-channel flow. Breinigsville, PA: Springer, 523 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cryer, D.C. and Chan, K., 2008. Time series analysis with applications in R. Springer, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ervine, D.A., Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., and Sellin, R.H.J., 2000. Two-dimensional solution for straight and meandering overbank flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 126 (9), 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, H.B., et al., 1979. Mixing in Inland and coastal waters. London: Academic Press, 483 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Flintham, T.P. and Carling, P.A., 1988. The prediction of mean bed and wall boundary shear in uniform and compositely rough channels. In: W.R. White, ed. International conference on River Regime, Wallingford, UK, 18–20 May 1988. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 267–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J.F., et al., 2005. Fluid-sediment dynamics around a barb: an experimental case study of a hydraulic structure for the Pacific Northwest. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32 (5), 853–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich, D.C., 2002. User's manual for FESWMS FST2DH. Two-dimensional depth-averaged flow and sediment transport model, Release 3. Washington: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Froehlich, D.C., 2013. Sizing loose rock riprap to protect stream banks. River Research and Applications, 29 (2), 219–235. doi: 10.1002/rra.1587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J. and Julien, P.Y., 2005. Shear stress in smooth rectangular open channel flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (1), 30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D.M. and Mason, P.D., 1998. Roughness characteristics of New Zealand rivers. Englewood: Water Resources Publications, LLC, 329 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hitoshi, S., et al., 1995. Numerical analysis of developing turbulent flow in a square-sectioned 90 degree bend. Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Series B, 61 (587), 2393–2400.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, B.W., 2005. Two-dimensional numerical simulation of flow in a steep-gradient stream:implications for sediment transport and habitat conditions. Thesis (MS). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Ipson, M.K., 2006. Analysis of the sediment transport capabilities of FESWMS FST2DH. Thesis (MS). Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M., Rennie, C.D., and Townsend, R.D., 2013. 3D flow and sediment dynamics in a laboratory channel bend with and without stream barbs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (2), 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julien, P.Y., 2010. Erosion and sedimentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 371 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kean, J.W. and Smith, J.D., 2006. Form drag in rivers due to small-scale natural topographic features: 2. Irregular sequences. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111 (F4). doi: 10.1029/2006JF000490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A.A. and Barkdoll, B.D., 2001. Two-dimensional depth-averaged models for flow simulation in river bends. International Journal of Computational Engineering Science, 2 (3), 453–467.
   Google Scholar
• Khosronejad, A., et al., 2013. Experimental and computational investigation of local scour around instream restoration structures. Advances in Water Resources, 54 (1), 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgore, R.T. and Cotton, G.K., 2005. Design of roadside channels with flexible linings. Arlington: Hydraulic Engineering Circular Number 15, Publication No. FHWA-NHI-05-114, September 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Knighton, D., 1998. Fluvial forms and processes. A new perspective. London: Hodder Arnold Publication, 383 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lagasse, P.F., et al., 2006. Riprap design criteria, recommended specifications, and quality control. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report 568.
   Google Scholar
• Lagasse, et al., 2009. Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures: experience, selection, and design guidance. Arlington: Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 23, Publication No. FHWA-NHI-09-111, September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, E.W., 1955. Stable channel design. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 120, 1234–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, L.B., Wolman, M.G., and Miller, J.P., 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. San Francisco, California: W.H. Freemano, 522 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, D.R., ed., 1992. Handbook of hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Matin, H. and Elbert, K.R., 2004. Clackamette Cove-Clackamas riverbank stabilization project: a two dimensional element hydraulic model case study. In: Proceedings of 2001 ASCE Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference. Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Maynord, S.T., 1991. Flow resistance of riprap. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 117 (6), 687–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, L., et al., 1993. Urban BMP cost and effectiveness summary data for 6217(g) guidance: erosion and sediment control during construction. Denver: Woodward-Clyde Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrotra, S.C., 1983. Permissible velocity correction factors. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109 (2), 305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville, B.W. and Coleman, S.E., 2000. Bridge scour. Colorado: Water Resources Publications, LCC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A.J., and Cluer, B.L., 1998. Modeling considerations for simulation of flow in bedrock channels. In: E.E. Wohl and K.J. Tinkler, eds. Rivers over rock: fluvial processes in bedrock channels. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 61–104.
   Google Scholar
• Mutel, C.F., 2010. A watershed year: anatomy of the Iowa floods of 2008. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 284 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Odgaard, A.J., 1987. Streambank erosion along two rivers in Iowa. Water Resources Research, 23 (7), 1225–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N. and Elhakeem, M., 2007. Design procedures and field monitoring of submerged barbs for streambank protection. Ames: IDOT, Final Report TR-534.
   Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N. and Elhakeem, M., 2008. Design procedures and numerical modeling of a combination of submerged barbs and riprap lining used for streambank protection of the Raccoon River, (USA), near the Krause family property. Final Report. Iowa City: IIHR – Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N. and Hilldale, R., 2002. Turbulence characteristic in gradual channel transition. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128 (9), 948–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N., et al., 2010. Evaluation of the Missouri river shallow water habitat using a 2D hydrodynamic model. River Research and Applications, 27 (2), 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N., Elhakeem, M., and Wardman, B., 2011. Calibration and verification of a 2D hydrodynamic model for simulating flow around emergent Bendway Weir structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137 (1), 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papanicolaou, A.N., Wilson, C.G., and Bressan, F., 2012. Hydraulic design of streambank protection structures along the Des Moines River. Final Report submitted to David L. Barrett, Van Buren County Engineer. Iowa City: IIHR – Hydroscience & Engineering, The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternack, G.B., Wang, C.L., and Merz, J.E., 2004. Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to reach-scale spawning gravel replenishment on the lower Mokelumne River, California. River Research and Applications, 20 (2), 205–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasternack, G.B., et al., 2006. Error propagation for velocity and shear stress prediction using 2D models for environmental management. Journal of Hydrology, 328 (1–2), 227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, S.B., 2000. Turbulent flow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przedwojski, B., Blazejewski, R., and Pilarczyk, K.W., 1995. River training techniques fundamentals. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Radspinner, R.R., et al., 2010. River training and ecological enhancement potential using in-stream structures. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136 (Special Issue on River Flow Hydrodynamics: Physical and Ecological Aspects), 967–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichmuth, D.R., 1993. Living with fluvial systems. Workshop notes 23–25 February, 1993, Portland.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, B.L., 2003. Protocols for geomorphic characterization of meander bends in Illinois. Final Report. Urbana: Illinois Department of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C.E., Kadavy, K.C., and Robinson, K.M., 1998. Roughness of Loose Rock Riprap on steep slopes. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124 (2), 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, D.F., Kochel, R.C., and Miller, J.R., 2002. Process geomorphology. 4th ed. Dubuque: W.C. Brown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue-Gervais, K., Biron, M.B., and Lapointe, M.F., 2010. Temporal development of scour holes around submerged stream deflectors. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137 (7), 781–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosgen, D.L., 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena, 22 (3), 169–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiono, K. and Knight, D.W., 1991. Turbulent open channel flows with variable depth across the channel. Journal of Fluid Mechanism, 222 (January), 617–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, D.B. and Richardson, E.V., 1961. Forms of bed roughness in alluvial channels. Journal of Hydrolics Division, 87 (HY3), and Trans., Vol. 128. Reston, Va.
   Google Scholar
• Soong, T.W. and DePue II, P.M., 1996. Variation of manning's coefficient with channel stage. Urbana, IL: Water Resources Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UILU-WRC-96-221, Research Report 221.
   Google Scholar
• Sutarto, T.E. and Papanicolaou, A.N., 2012. Measuring critical erosion strength of cohesive bank soils in a natural channel affected by secondary currents. In: Third International Symposium on Shallow Flows. Iowa City, USA, June, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tayfur, G. and Singh, V.P., 2005. Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams by artificial neural network. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (11), 991–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uijttewaal, W.S.J., 2005. Effects of Groyne layout on the flow in Groyne fields: laboratory experiments. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131 (9), 782–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, (USACE), 1979. Des Moines river bank erosion study, Iowa and Missouri. Rock Island, Illinois: U.S. Corps of Eng., Stage 2. Final feasibility report, Rock Island Dist.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, (USACE), 1988. Bendway weir theory, development, and design. Vicksburg: USACE Waterways Experiment Station Fact Sheet.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, R.M. and Wilson, I., 1996. Probability distribution of annual maximum, mean, and minimum streamflows in the United States. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1 (2), 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), 2010. Hydraulics manual. Olympia: WSDOT Technical Manual M23-03.03, Washington State Department of Transportation. Available from: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/fulltext/M23-03/HydraulicsManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Welch, S. and Wright, P.E. 2005. Design of stream barbs. Portland: USDA, Technical Note 23.
   Google Scholar
• Wittler, R.J. and Klawon, E.K., 2004. Upper Gila River fluvial geomorphology study. Final report. Denver: US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, GRANT NO. 98-054WPF.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., 2008. Computational river dynamics. London: Simons Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Yalin, M.S. and daSilva, A.M., 2001. Fluvial processes. Delft: IAHR Monograph, 197 p.
   Google Scholar