Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach

References

• Baan, P. and Klijn, F., 2010. Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Journal of River Basin Management [online], 113–122. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226.
   Google Scholar
• Bosher, L., et al., 2007. Realising a resilient and sustainable built environment: towards a strategic agenda for the United Kingdom. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Burby, R.J. and Dalton, L.C., 1994. Plans can matter: the role of land use plans and state planning mandates in limiting the development of hazardous areas. Public Administration Review, 54 (3), 229–238. doi: 10.2307/976725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIRIA, 2010. Flood resilience and resistance for critical infrastructure. CIRIA Report C688. London: CIRIA.
   Google Scholar
• Defra, 2005. Making space for water: taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management forward in England. London: Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Defra, 2013. Flood insurance clauses (establishing the flood reinsurance scheme) [online]. London: Defra. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/237133/flood-insurance-clauses.pdf [Accessed 13 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency, 2010. Flood and coastal risk management risk mapping strategy 2010–2015 [online]. London: Environment Agency. Available from: http://a0768b4a8a31e106d8b0-50dc802554eb38a24458b98ff72d550b.r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/geho0310bsbs-e-e.pdf [Accessed 18 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency, 2012. Greater working with natural processes in flood and coastal erosion risk management: a response to Pitt Review recommendation 27 [online]. London: Environment Agency. Available from: http://a0768b4a8a31e106d8b0-50dc802554eb38a24458b98ff72d550b.r19.cf3.rackcdn.com/geho0811buci-e-e.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Ermolieva, T. and Ermoliev, T., 2013. Optimizing public private risk transfer systems for flood risk management in the Upper Tisza region in integrated catastrophe risk modeling: supporting policy processes. In: A. Amendola et al., eds. Integrated catastrophe risk modeling: supporting policy processes. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 245–262.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E.P., et al., 2004a. Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 2: managing future risks. London: Office of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E.P., et al., 2004b. Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 1: future risks and their drivers. London: Office of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldby, B., et al., 2010. Development of application of efficient methods for the forward propagation of epistemic uncertainty and sensitivity analysis within complex broad-scale flood risk system models. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 37 (7), 955–967. doi:10.1139/L09-173.
   Google Scholar
• Green, C.H., 2003. Handbook of water economics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. and Solomatine, D., 2008. A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions. Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (2), 85–98. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J., et al., 2003a. Integrated flood risk management in England and Wales. Journal of Natural Hazards Review 2003, 4 (3), 126–135. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(126)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J.W., et al., 2003b. A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Proc. ICE: Water and Maritime Engineering, 156 (3), 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J.W., et al., 2013. Systems-of-systems analysis of national infrastructure. Institution of Civil Engineers, Journal Engineering Sustainability, 166 (5), 249–257. doi: 10.1680/ensu.12.00028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartford, D.N.D. and Baecher, G.B., 2004. Risk and uncertainty in dam safety. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D., et al., 2010. Flood risk assessment of complex riverine systems. In Innovations in Watershed Management under Land Use and Climate Change. Proceedings of the 2010 Watershed Management conference, 23–27 August 2010, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (pp. 236–247). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). doi:10.1061/41114(371)483. Available from: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/41114(371)483 [Accessed 25 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, G. and McFadden, L., 2009. Strategies for flood risk management [online]. EC Integrated Project FLOODsite Report T13–09–02. Available from: www.floodsite.net [Accessed 20 March 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Kunreuther, H. and Heal, G., 2012. Managing catastrophic risk. In: J. Shogren, ed. Encyclopedia of energy, natural resources and environmental economics, Volume 3. London: Elsevier, 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Link, L.E. and Galloway, G.E., 2009. Risk system model. Course handout, managing natural disaster, ENCE 689M. University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Lumbroso, D., et al., 2008. Task 17: flood incident management [online]. Published by the EC Project FLOODsite as report T17–07–02. Available from: www.floodsite.net [Accessed 20 March 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Maksimović, C., et al., 2013. Blue Green Dream project's solutions for urban areas in the future [online]. Published as part of Reporting for Sustainability, London. Available from: http://www.sciconfemc.rs/PAPERS/BLUE%20GREEN%20.pdf [Accessed 18 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• McGahey, C. and Sayers, P., 2008. Long term planning – robust strategic decision-making in the face of gross uncertainty – tools and application to the Thames. Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice. Proceedings of FLOODrisk 2008, 30 September–2 October. Oxford: Taylor & Francis, 1543–1553 (on CD).
   Google Scholar
• Milly, P., et al., 2008. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science [online], 319, 573–574. Available from: http://wwwpaztcn.wr.usgs.gov/julio_pdf/milly_et_al.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, 2006. Spatial planning key decision room for the river – approved decision 19 December 2006 [online]. Published by the Dutch Government. Available from: http://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/media/21963/pkb%204%20approved%20decision%20h01-h086.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., 2004. The governance of land use river basins: Prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Proceedings of the Journal of Land Use Policy, 21 (1), 85–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.001 [Accessed 25 March 2014]. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opperman, J.J., Galloway, G.E., and Duvail, S., 2013. The multiple benefits of river-floodplain connectivity for people and biodiversity. In: S.A. Levin, ed. Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2nd ed., Volume 7. Waltham, MA: Academic Press, 144–160.
   Google Scholar
• Raschky, P., 2007. Estimating the effects of risk transfer mechanisms against floods in Europe and U.S.A.: a dynamic panel approach [online]. Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck working papers. Available from: http://eeecon.uibk.ac.at/wopec2/repec/inn/wpaper/2007-05.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, P., et al., 2010. Framework for integrated flood risk management. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydraulic Research, IAHR, European Congress, May 2010, Edinburgh. Available from: http://web.sbe.hw.ac.uk/staffprofiles/bdgsa/IAHR_2010_European_Congress/Papers%20by%20session%20final/Flood%20Management%20III/FMaIIIa.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., Hall, J., and Meadowcroft, I., 2002. Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK. ICE Journal of Civil Engineering 2002, 150 (5), 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., et al., 2010. Towards the next generation of risk-based asset management tools. In: G. Pender, ed. Flood risk science and management. London: Blackwell, 313–335.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., et al., 2011. Flood risk management: international case studies. WWF-UK/China and the General Institute of Water Design and Planning, China. Published by WWF-UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P.B., Galloway, G.E., and Hall, J.W., 2012. Robust decision making under uncertainty – towards adaptive and resilient flood risk management infrastructure. In: P.B. Sayers, ed. Flood risk: planning, design and management of flood defence infrastructure. London: Thomas Telford, 281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., et al., 2013. Flood risk management: a strategic approach [online]. Asian Development Bank, Manila; China General Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Planning and Design, Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing; UNESCO, Paris; WWF International, Gland Switzerland. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2013/flood-risk-management.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Schanze, J., 2006. Flood risk management–a basic framework. In: J. Schanze, E. Zeman, and J. Marsalek, eds. Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. NATO Science Series Volume 67. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA, 2012. Natural flood management position statement: the role of SEPA in natural flood management [online]. Published by Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA). Available from: http://www.sepa.org.uk/flooding [Accessed 31 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Talling, P., 2011. London's lost rivers. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrant, O. and Sayers, P., 2012. Managing flood risk in the Thames Estuary – the development of a long term robust and flexible strategy (P. Sayers, ed). London: Thomas Telford. doi: 10.1680/fr.41561. Format: Hardbound, Electronic Hardbound.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1992. Rio Declaration and Agenda 21. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 2005. Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being [online]. Statement from the Board. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Publication of the United Nations. Available from: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.429.aspx.pdf [Accessed 31 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• US National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), n.d. The Integrated Resilient Design Program [online]. Available from: http://www.nibs.org/index.php/irdp [Accessed 18 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• US National Research Council (NRC), 2000. Risk analysis and uncertainty in flood damage reduction studies [online]. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9971.html [Accessed 18 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• US National Research Council (NRC), 2012a. Disaster resilience: a national imperative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• US National Research Council (NRC), 2012b. Dam and levee safety and community resilience: a vision for future practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• US National Research Council (NRC), 2013. Levees and the National Flood Insurance program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C.L., et al., 2013. Experiences of integrated assessment of climate impacts, adaptation and mitigation modelling in London and Durban. Environment and Urbanization, 25 (2), 361–380. doi: 10.1177/0956247813501121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willows, R.I. and Connell, R.K., 2003. Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty and decision-making. UKCIP technical report. Oxford: UKCIP.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Economic Development (WCED), 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Meteorological Office (WMO), 2009. Integrated flood management: concept paper [online]. Published by WMO and Global Water Partnership (GWP). WMO Report No. 1047. Available from: http://www.unwater.org/downloads/concept_paper_e.pdf [Accessed 12 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., et al., 2012. Broad-scale reliability of the flood defence infrastructure within the Taihu Basin. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 6 (1), 42–56. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12034.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.L., et al., 2005. Impact of dams on Yangtze River sediment supply to the sea and delta intertidal wetland response. Journal of the American Geophysical Union [online]. Available from: http://myweb.uiowa.edu/ipeate/downloads/Yangtze.pdf [Accessed 12 December 2013].
   Google Scholar