Enhancing flood risk system robustness in practice: insights from two river valleysFootnote

† A preliminary version of this paper was published as ‘Enhancing system robustness in practice’ (Mens et al. Citation2011).

References

• Asselman, N., et al., in prep. Proeve Maas (UK: Deltaprogramme Rivers, flood risk analysis for the Meuse). Delft: Deltares.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S., et al., 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what. Ecosystems, 4 (8), 765–781. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., 2005. Worst-case thinking: an idea whose time has come. Natural Hazards Observer, 29 (3), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, K.M., 2005. Resilience and flood risk management. A systems approach applied to lowland rivers. Dissertation (PhD). Technical University Delft.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, K.M., Mens, M.J.P., and Klijn, F., 2012. A method for developing long-term strategies for flood risk management. Flood risk management research into practice, 30 September–2 October 2008, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• DeltaProgramme, 2013. Delta programme 2013: the road towards the delta decisions. The Hague: Ministries of Infrastructure & Environment and Economic Affairs, Agriculture & Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• De Moel, H., Asselman, N.E.M., and Aerts, J.C.J.H., 2012. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12 (4), 1045–1058. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-1045-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downton, M.W., et al., 2005. Interactions between scientific uncertainty and flood management decisions: two case studies in Colorado. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 6 (3), 134–146.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3), 253–267. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. and Solomatine, D., 2008. A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (2), 85–98. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4 (1), 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S., 1996. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: P. Schulze, ed. Engineering within ecological constraints. Washington, DC: National Academy, 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2012. Managing the risk of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: IPCC.
   Google Scholar
• Jongman, B., Ward, P.J., and Aerts, J.C.J.H., 2012. Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: long term trends and changes. Global Environmental Change, 22 (4), 823–835. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B.J., 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1 (1), 11–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., et al., 2012. In search of robust flood risk management alternatives for the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12 (5), 1469–1479. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-1469-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mens, M. J. P. and Klijn, F. 2014. The added value of system robustness analysis for flood risk management. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences Discussions, 2 (4), 2913–2945.
   Google Scholar
• Mens, M.J.P., et al., 2011. The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy, 14 (8), 1121–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., Elmer, F., and Thieken, A.H., 2009. Significance of ‘high probability/low damage’ versus ‘low probability/high damage’ flood events. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9 (3), 1033–1046. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-1033-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., et al., 2010. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10 (3), 509–527. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijkswaterstaat, 2007. Manual for assessing primary flood defences 2006. The Hague: Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A., 1998. Risk at a turning point? Journal of Risk Research, 1 (2), 97–109. doi: 10.1080/136698798377204
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. and Salt, D., 2006. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar