Recent Slovak flood protection relative to integrated flood risk management

References

• Act No. 7/2010 regarding flood defence. Available from: http://www.zbierka.sk [Accessed 18 October 2010 ].
   Google Scholar
• Adger, N., et al., 2004. New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Technical Report 7. Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
   Google Scholar
• Ale, B., Aven, T., and Jogejan, R., 2010. Review and discussion of basic concepts and principles in integrated risk management. In: R. Briš, C. Guedes Soares and S. Martorell, eds. Reliability, risk and safety: theory and applications. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 421–427.
   Google Scholar
• Alwang, J., Siegel, P.B., and Jorgensen, S.L., 2001. Vulnerability: A view from different disciplines. Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, No. 0115, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, H., Aronica, G.T., Kreibich, H., and Thieken, A.H., 2009. Flood risk analyses – how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards, 49, 79–98. doi: 10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM), 2004. Integrated flood management. Concept paper. Geneva: The Associated Programme on Flood Management, World Meteorological Organization and Global Water Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T., 2012. Foundational issues in risk assessment and risk management. Risk Analysis, 32 (10), 1647–1656. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01798.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednárová, E., and Miščík, M., 2011. The importance of reservoirs and dikes in flood prevention (in Slovak). In: River basin and flood risk management. Proceedings of the conference, 6–8 December 2011, Častá-Papiernička, Slovakia: Water Research Institute, 8.
   Google Scholar
• Birkmann, J., 2006. Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: J. Birkmann, ed. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 9–54.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, P., et al., 1994. At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, A.K., Schmidtlein, M.C., Emrich, C.H.T., Piegorsch, W.W., and Cutter, S.L., 2007. Vulnerability of U.S. cities to environmental hazards. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 4 (2), 1–21. doi: 10.2202/1547-7355.1279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., and Van Ek, R., 2004. Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood protection measures in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 50 (1–2), 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., and Damery, S., 2002. Managing flood risk in the UK: towards an integration of social and technical perspectives. Transactions/Institute of British Geographers, 27 (4), 412–426. doi: 10.1111/1475-5661.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bründl, M., Romang, H.E., Bischof, N., and Rheinberger, C.M., 2009. The risk concept and its application in natural hazard risk management in Switzerland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9, 801–813. Available from: www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/801/2009/ [Accessed 24 October 2014]. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-801-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashman, A., 2011. Case study of institutional and social responses to flooding: reforming for resilience? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4, 33–41. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01087.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, Ch., Evans, E., Tate, E., and Webb, J., 2008. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18, 598–606. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., and Shirley, W.L., 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (2), 242–261. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.8402002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, R., Ball, T., Werritty, J., Werritty, A., Hall, J., and Roche, N., 2011. Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 628–646. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DETR, 2000. Guidelines for environmental risk assessment and management. Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions. Available from: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/quality/risk/eramguide [Accessed 18 March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, H., 1988. Landslide risk assessment procedure. Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Landslides, 10–15 July, 1988, Lausanne: A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1075–1090.
   Google Scholar
• EU, 2007. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risk. Official Journal of the EU, 2007, L288/27.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, G., 2002. How can we learn to live with rivers? The findings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Presidential Commission on flood-risk management. Philosophy Transactions of the Royal Society London, A, 360, 1527–1530. doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FLOODsite, 2006. Guidelines for socio-economic flood damage evaluation. FLOODsite project report number T9–06–01.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S., 2009. Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria – paradigms of vulnerability revisited. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 9, 337–352. Available from: www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/337/2009/ [Accessed 24 October 2014]. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-337-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galloway, G.F., 2008. Flood risk management in the United States and the impact of Hurricane Katrina. Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (4), 301–306. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635357
   Google Scholar
• Government of the SR, 2006. Conception of Water Management Policy of the SR until 2015. Resolution of the Government no. 117. Available from: http://www.rokovania.sk [Accessed 10 April 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Government of the SR, 2010. Programme of Landscape Revitalisation and Integrated Management of River Basins in the SR. Resolution of the Government no. 744. Available from: http://www.rokovania.sk [Accessed 12 May 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Government of the SR, 2011. Analysis of the Current Status of Flood Defence in the Slovak Republic Including the Current Implementation Stage of the Flood Warning and Forecast Systems. Resolution of the Government no. 179, 2011. Available from: http://www.rokovania.sk [Accessed 18 November 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Green, C., 2004. The evaluation of vulnerability to flooding. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13 (4), 323–329. doi: 10.1108/09653560410556546
   Google Scholar
• Haimes, Y.Y., 2009. Risk modeling, assessment, and management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haimes, Y.Z., 2012. Systems-based guiding principles for risk modeling, planning, assessment, management and communication. Risk Analysis, 32 (9), 1451–1467. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01809.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassel, H., 2012. Risk and vulnerability analysis in practice: evaluation of analyses conducted in Swedish municipalities. Natural Hazards, 63, 605–628. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0172-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holub, M., and Fuchs, S., 2009. Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 9, 523–537. Available from: www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/9/523/2009/ [Accessed 24 October 2014]. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-523-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ič, T., 2013. Establishment flood risk management plans in areas, which were selected as the areas of potential significant flood risk by SWME, OZ Banská Bystrica in the preliminary flood risk assessment. In: River basin and flood risk management 2013. Proceedings of the scientific international conference, 11–13 December, 2013, Bratislava, Slovakia: Water Research Institute, 4.
   Google Scholar
• International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR)/United Nations (UN), 2007. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015. Geneva, Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak, E.H., Rahman, A., Westra, S., Sharma, A., and Kuczera, G., 2013. Evaluating the non-stationarity of Australian annual maximum floods. Journal of Hydrology, 494, 134–145. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., Samuels, P., and Van Os, A., 2008. Towards flood risk management in the EU: state of affairs with examples from various European countries. Journal of River Basin Management, 6 (4), 307–321. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635358
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C., Scolobing, A., Tapsell, S., Steinführer, A., and De Marchi, B., 2011. Contextualizing social vulnerability: findings from case studies across Europe. Natural Hazards, 58, 789–810. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9751-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, K.H., 2014. From flood control to flood adaptation: a case study on the lower Green River Valley and the City of Kent in King County, Washington. Natural Hazards, 71, 723–750. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0923-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., Hall, J., Disse, M., and Schumann, A., 2010. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 509–527. Available from: www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/10/509/2010/ [Accessed 24 October 2014]. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, F., and Meyer, V., 2005. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception – challenge for flood damage research. UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Lepizig–Halle, Discussion papers, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., Haase, D., and Scheuer, S., 2007. GIS-based multicriteria analysis as decision support in flood risk management. UFZ Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig–Halle, Discussion papers, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., Priest, S., and Kuhlicke, C., 2012. Economic evaluation of structural and non-structural flood risk management measures: Examples from the Mulde River. Natural Hazards, 62, 301–324. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9997-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., Scheuer, S., and Haase, D., 2009. A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde River, Germany. Natural Hazards, 48, 17–39. doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9244-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milly, P.C.D., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R.M., Kundzewicz, Z.W., Lettenmaier, D.P., and Stouffer, R.J., 2008. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science, 319, 573–574. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/319/5863/573.full.pdf [Accessed 24 October 2014]. doi: 10.1126/science.1151915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, B.H., 1999. Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters, 23 (1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/1467-7717.00102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plate, E., 2002. Flood risk and flood management. Journal of Hydrology, 267, 2–11. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00135-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottier, N., Penning-Rowsell, E., Tunstall, S., and Hubert, G., 2005. Land use and flood protection: contrasting approaches and outcomes in France and in England and Wales. Applied Geography, 25, 1–27. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2004.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J., and Van der Veen, A., 2008. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46, 307–322. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauken, T., and Kelman, I., 2010. River flood vulnerability in Norway through the pressure and release model. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3, 314–322. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01080.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D., Pielke Jr. R., and Keykhah, M., 2003. Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective. Risk Analysis, 23 (4), 805–810. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, P.B., Hall, J.W., and Meadowcroft, I.C., 2002. Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK. Proceedings of ICE, Civil Engineering, 150, 36–42. doi:10.1680/cien.2002.150.5.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderbauer, S. and Ehrlich, D., 2004. Risk, hazard and people's vulnerability to natural hazards. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, EUR 21410.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D.M., and Human, R.J., 2008. Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Natural Hazards, 47, 143–155. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9202-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solín, Ľ., 2008. Analysis of floods occurrence in Slovakia in the period 1996–2006 (in Slovak). Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 56 (2), 95–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solín, Ľ., 2011. Regional variability of flood threat in small basins of Slovakia (in Slovak). Geografický časopis, 63 (1), 29–52.
   Google Scholar
• Solín, Ľ., 2012. Spatial variability in the flood vulnerability of urban areas in the headwater basins of Slovakia. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 5, 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2012.01153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solín, Ľ., Madajová, M., and Skubinčan, P., 2013. Analysis of commercial flood risk insurance in Slovakia (manuscript submitted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Solín, Ľ., Skubinčan, P., and Madajová, M., 2014. A preliminary flood-risk assessment of municipalities located in headwater basins of Slovakia based on the integrated approach. In: C.A. Brebbia, ed. Risk analysis IX. New Forest: WIT Press, 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• SWME. 2011. A preliminary flood risk assessment in Slovak Republic. Available from: http://www.minzp.sk/sekcie/temy-oblasti/voda/ochrana-pred-povodnami/manazment-povodnovych-rizik [Accessed 28 December 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Tapsell, S.M., et al., 2002. Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 360, 1511–1525. doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B.L., et al., 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(14), 8074–8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thywissen, K., 2006. Components of risk, a comparative glossary. United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security. Publication Series of UNU-EHS 2.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN), 1992. Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management Risk. Geneva: UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, A., 2004. Disasters and economic damage: macro, meso and micro approaches. Disaster Prevention and Management, 13 (4), 274–279. doi: 10.1108/09653560410556483
   Google Scholar
• Weingartner, R., Barben, M., and Spreafico, M., 2003. Floods in mountain areas – an overview based on examples from Switzerland. Journal of Hydrology, 282 (1–4), 10–24. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00249-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werritty, A., 2006. Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm? Area, 38 (1), 16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheater, H.S., 2006. Flood hazard and management: a UK perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 364, 2135–2145. doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G.F., 1974. Natural hazards, local, national, global. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., and Davis, I., 2004. At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar