Integrated Flood Management in developing countries: balancing flood risk, sustainable livelihoods, and ecosystem services

References

• APFM, 2004. Integrated flood management concept paper. Geneva: Associated Programme on Flood Management, World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Arnall, A., et al., 2013. Flooding, resettlement, and change in livelihoods: evidence from rural Mozambique. Disasters, 37 (3), 468–488. doi: 10.1111/disa.12003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baan, P.J.A. and Klijn, F., 2004. Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 2 (2), 113–122. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J.S., et al., 2002. Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecological Applications, 12 (5), 1247–1260. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1247:MEASNF]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E.S., et al., 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science, 308 (5722), 636–637. doi: 10.1126/science.1109769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijse, A.D., et al., 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology, 47 (4), 889–907. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00915.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijse, A., et al., 2005. Rehabilitation of large rivers: references, achievements and integration into river management. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie Supplement, 155 (1–4), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, X., 2005. Changes of flood control situations and adjustments of flood management strategies in China. Water International, 30 (1), 108–113. doi: 10.1080/02508060508691842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S.J., Bruce-Burgess, L., and Wharton, G., 2003. Linking form and function: towards an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 13 (5), 439–450. doi: 10.1002/aqc.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colls, A., Ash, N., and Ikkala, N., 2009. Ecosystem-based adaptation: a natural response to climate change. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Corvers, R., 2009. Vulnerable to flooding? Nature development and ‘room for the river’: a governance perspective. In: U.F. Paleo, ed. Building safer communities: risk governance, spatial planning, and responses to natural hazards. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Cuny, F.C., 1991. Living with floods: alternatives for riverine flood mitigation. Land Use Policy, 8 (4), 331–342. doi: 10.1016/0264-8377(91)90023-C
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, S. and Piégay, H., 2009. From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications, 25 (5), 568–581. doi: 10.1002/rra.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, H. and Appendini, K., 2008. Livelihood change, farming, and managing flood risk in the Lerma Valley, Mexico. Agriculture and Human Values, 25 (4), 555–566. doi: 10.1007/s10460-008-9140-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Roth, D., and Winnubst, M., 2013. Dealing with uncertainties in the Dutch room for the river programme: a comparison between the Overdiep polder and Noordwaard. In: J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, eds. Making space for the river: governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijk, P., et al., 2013. Good flood, bad flood: maintaining dynamic river basins for community resilience. In: F.G. Renaud, K. Sudmeier-Rieux, and M. Estrella, eds. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. New York: United Nations University Press, 221–247.
   Google Scholar
• Estrella, M. and Saalismaa, N., 2013. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR): an overview. In: F.G. Renaud, K. Sudmeier-Rieux, and M. Estrella, eds. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 26–54.
   Google Scholar
• Few, R., 2003. Flooding, vulnerability and coping strategies: local responses to a global threat. Progress in Development Studies, 3 (1), 43–58. doi: 10.1191/1464993403ps049ra
   Google Scholar
• Few, R., Pham, G., and Bui, T., 2004. Living with floods: health risks and coping strategies of the urban poor in Vietnam. Research project funded by British Academy (Committee for South East Asian studies), research report, May.
   Google Scholar
• Galat, D.L., et al., 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands: natural and controlled flooding as complementary processes along the lower Missouri River. BioScience, 48 (9), 721–733. doi: 10.2307/1313335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabs, W., Tyagi, A., and Hyodo, M., 2007. Integrated flood management. Water Science & Technology, 56 (4), 97–103. doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M.A., and Boumans, R.M.J., 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41 (3), 393–408. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, G. and Kasperson, R., 2011. Dilemmas and pathways to dealing with flood problems in twenty-first century China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2 (3), 21–30. doi: 10.1007/s13753-011-0013-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., 2013. Land policy for German rivers: making space for the rivers. In: J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, eds. Making space for the river, governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Hein, L., et al., 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57 (2), 209–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, D.L. and Philippi, N.S., 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the upper Mississippi river basin as a case history. Restoration Ecology, 3 (1), 4–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00070.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, T.P., et al., 2004. Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics, 49 (1), 19–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijer, A., et al., 2004. Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: synopsis of the findings of IRMA-SPONGE. River Research and Applications, 20 (3), 343–357. doi: 10.1002/rra.781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibe, C., Ahaotu, E., and Aju, P., 2014. Management of rivers and flood plains for flood-risk reduction and biodiversity benefits. International Journal of AgriScience, 4 (6), 321–325.
   Google Scholar
• Jungwirth, M., Muhar, S., and Schmutz, S., 2002. Re-establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology, 47 (4), 867–887. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiker, G.A., et al., 2005. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1 (2), 95–108. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., van Buuren, M., and van Rooij, S.A., 2004. Flood-risk management strategies for an uncertain future: living with Rhine river floods in the Netherlands? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 33 (3), 141–147. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.3.141
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., et al., 2013. Design quality of room-for-the-river measures in the Netherlands: role and assessment of the quality team (Q-team). International Journal of River Basin Management, 11 (3), 287–299. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2013.811418
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf, G.M., et al., 2006. Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology and Society [online], 11 (2), 5. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art5/ [Accessed 24 January 2015].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltby, E. and Blackwell, M.S.A., 2005. Managing riverine environments in the context of new water policy in Europe. International Journal of River Basin Management, 3 (2), 133–141. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2005.9635253
   Google Scholar
• Merz, B., et al., 2010a. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10 (3), 509–527. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., et al., 2010b. Review article “assessment of economic flood damage”. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10 (8), 1697–1724. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messner, F. and Meyer, V., 2006. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception–challenges for flood damage research. In: J. Schanze, E. Zeman, and J. Marsalek, eds. Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Dordrecht: Springer, 149–167.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., Haase, D., and Scheuer, S., 2009a. Flood risk assessment in European river basins—concept, methods, and challenges exemplified at the Mulde river. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 5 (1), 17–26. doi: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-031.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer, V., Scheuer, S., and Haase, D., 2009b. A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany. Natural Hazards, 48 (1), 17–39. doi: 10.1007/s11069-008-9244-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, V., et al., 2013. Review article: assessing the costs of natural hazards–state of the art and knowledge gaps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13 (5), 1351–1373. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-1351-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, M.M.Q., 2003. Climate change and extreme weather events: can developing countries adapt? Climate Policy, 3 (3), 233–248. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2003.0330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T., 2007. Institutional drivers and constraints of floodplain restoration in Europe. International Journal of River Basin Management, 5 (2), 121–130. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2007.9635312
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, T., 2003. Ecosystem-based river basin management: its approach and policy-level application. Hydrological Processes, 17 (14), 2711–2725. doi: 10.1002/hyp.1429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nienhuis, P.H. and Leuven, R.S.E.W., 2001. River restoration and flood protection: controversy or synergism? Hydrobiologia, 444 (1–3), 85–99. doi: 10.1023/A:1017509410951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland, H.J., 2005. Sustainable development of floodplains (SDF) project. Environmental Science & Policy, 8 (3), 245–252. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opperman, J.J., et al., 2009. Sustainable floodplains through large-scale reconnection to rivers. Science, 326 (5959), 1487–1488. doi: 10.1126/science.1178256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., et al., 2008. The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecological economics, 64 (3), 484–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M., et al., 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environmental Management, 44 (6), 1053–1068. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9329-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, B.K., 1997. Flood research in Bangladesh in retrospect and prospect: A review. Geoforum, 28 (2), 121–131. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(97)00004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, S.K. and Routray, J.K., 2010. Flood proneness and coping strategies: the experiences of two villages in Bangladesh. Disasters, 34 (2), 489–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01139.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff, N.L., et al., 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience, 47 (11), 769–784. doi: 10.2307/1313099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, K., 2013. Finding “space for water”: crossing concrete policy thresholds in England. In: J. Werner, A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, eds. Making space for the river, governance experiences with multifunctional river flood in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing, 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Primavera, J.H., 2000. Development and conservation of Philippine mangroves: institutional issues. Ecological Economics, 35 (1), 91–106. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00170-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purps, J., Damm, C., and Neuschulz, F., 2005. Re-establishing floodplain forests and dike relocation: a model project carried out at the Elbe River, Germany. Archiv für Hydrobiologie. Supplementband. Large rivers, 15 (1–4), 561–568.
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J., and van der Veen, A., 2008. Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis: an exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46 (3), 307–322. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaud, F.G., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., and Estrella, M., 2013. The relevance of ecosystems for disaster risk reduction. In: F.G. Renaud, K. Sudmeier-Rieux, and M. Estrella, eds. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, B.D. and Thomas, G.A., 2007. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society [online], 12 (1), 12. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art12/ [Accessed 24 January 2015].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijke, J., et al., 2012. Room for the river: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10 (4), 369–382. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2012.739173
   Google Scholar
• Roth, D. and Warner, J.F., 2007. Flood risk, uncertainty and changing river protection policy in the Netherlands: the case of ‘calamity polders’. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 98 (4), 519–525. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanze, J., 2006. Flood risk management – a basic framework. In: J. Schanze, E. Zeman, and J. Marsalek, eds. Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sear, D., 1994. River restoration and geomorphology. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 4 (2), 169–177. doi: 10.1002/aqc.3270040207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seavy, N.E., et al., 2009. Why climate change makes riparian restoration more important than ever: recommendations for practice and research. Ecological Restoration, 27 (3), 330–338. doi: 10.3368/er.27.3.330
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2009. Connecting biodiversity and climate change mitigation and adaptation: report of the second ad hoc technical expert group on biodiversity and climate change. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, B., Halls, A., and Barr, J., 2004. Rice versus fish revisited: on the integrated management of floodplain resources in Bangladesh. Natural Resources Forum, 28 (2), 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., et al., 2004. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24 (2), 311–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Staveren, M.F., et al., 2014. Let's bring in the floods: de-poldering in the Netherlands as a strategy for long-term delta survival? Water International, 39 (5), 686–700. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2014.957510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Stokkom, H.T.C., Smits, A.J.M., and Leuven, R.S.E.W., 2005. Flood defense in The Netherlands. Water International, 30 (1), 76–87. doi: 10.1080/02508060508691839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudmeier-Rieux, K. and Ash, N., 2009. Environmental guidance note for disaster risk reduction: healthy ecosystems for human security. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, J.H., et al., 2010. Linking ecosystem services, rehabilitation, and river hydrogeomorphology. BioScience, 60 (1), 67–74. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinh, D.Q. and Hang, P.T., 2003. Living with floods in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam. World Water Forum. Japan, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Tockner, K. and Stanford, J.A., 2002. Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation, 29 (3), 308–330. doi: 10.1017/S037689290200022X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tockner, K., et al., 2008. Flood plains: critically threatened ecosystems. Aquatic Ecosystems: Trends and Global Prospects, 1, 45–61. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511751790.006
   Google Scholar
• Verkerk, J. and van Buuren, A., 2013. Space for the river: a condensed state of the art. In: J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, eds. Making space for the river governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing Alliance House, 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.Y., Lee, J.H.W., and Melching, C.S., 2015. Integrated river management. In: River dynamics and integrated river management. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press/Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 725–800.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J., et al., 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 17 (4–5), 311–323. doi: 10.1002/rrr.646
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J.F. and van Buuren, A., 2011. Implementing room for the river: narratives of success and failure in Kampen, the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (4), 779–801. doi: 10.1177/0020852311419387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J.F., Edelenbos, J., and van Buuren, A., 2013. Making space for the river: governance challenges. In: J.F. Warner, J. Edelenbos, and A. van Buuren, eds. Making space for the river, governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, P.J., et al., 2010. Extended-range probabilistic forecasts of Ganges and Brahmaputra floods in Bangladesh. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91 (11), 1493–1514. doi: 10.1175/2010BAMS2911.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Chan, N., 1995. Flood disaster management in Malaysia: an evaluation of the effectiveness of government resettlement schemes. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 4 (4), 22–29. doi: 10.1108/09653569510093405
   Google Scholar
• Wharton, G. and Gilvear, D.J., 2007. River restoration in the UK: Meeting the dual needs of the European Union water framework directive and flood defence? International Journal of River Basin Management, 5 (2), 143–154. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2007.9635314
   Google Scholar
• Wiering, M. and Arts, B., 2006. Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy? In: Living rivers: trends and challenges in science and management. Dordrecht: Springer, 327–338.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner, B., et al., 2004. At risk. 2nd ed. Great Britain: Routledge Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E., et al., 2005. River restoration. Water Resources Research, 41 (10), W10301. doi: 10.1029/2005WR003985
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, C., et al., 2013. Room for the river: international relevance. Water Governance, 2, 24–31.
   Google Scholar