Sediment yield in Paraopeba River Basin – MG, Brazil

References

• Alatorre, L.C., et al., 2012. Soil erosion and sediment delivery in a mountain catchment under scenarios of land use change using a spatially distributed numerical model. Hydrological Earth Systems Sciences, 16, 1321–1334. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-1321-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amore, E., et al., 2004. Scale effect in USLE and WEPP application for soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins. Journal of Hydrology, 293, 100–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 1975. Sedimentation engineering. ASCE manuals & reports on engineering practice. n. 54. New York: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Asselman, N.E.M., 2000. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves. Journal of Hydrology, 234, 228–248. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00253-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni, J. and Lombard Neto, F.L., 2005. Conservação do solo. 5th ed. São Paulo: Ed. Ícone, 355 p.
   Google Scholar
• Beskow, S., et al., 2009. Soil erosion prediction in the Grande river basin, Brazil, using distributed modeling. Catena, 79, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2009.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, S., et al., 2011. Modelagem das perdas de água por evaporação e arraste em aspersores de média pressão. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 15 (3), 221–228. doi: 10.1590/S1415-43662011000300001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloise, G.L.F., et al., 2001. Avaliação da suscetibilidade natural à erosão dos solos da bacia do Olaria – DF. Planaltina-DF: Embrapa Cerrados, 33 p. (Boletim Técnico, 14).
   Google Scholar
• Camargo, A.P. and Sentelhas, P.C., 1997. Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração potencial no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 5, 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, N.O., et al., 2000. Guia de práticas sedimentológicas. Brasília – DF: ANEEL – Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, Superintendência de Estudos e Informações Hidrológicas, 132 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, H.M.L., 1994. Estimativa da erosão atual e potencial no vale do São Francisco: relatório final de consultoria. Brasília: CODEVASF, 35 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves, H.M.L., 2010. Relações de aporte de sedimento e implicações de sua utilização no pagamento por serviço ambiental em bacias hidrográficas. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 34, 1469–1477. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000400043
   Google Scholar
• Conceição, M.A.F., and Coelho, R.D., 2003. Simulating wind effect on microsprinkler water distribution. Scientia Agricola, 60, 205–209. doi: 10.1590/S0103-90162003000200001
   Google Scholar
• CPRM (Companhia de Pesquisa de Recursos Minerais), 2001. Superintendência Regional de Belo Horizonte. Regionalização de vazões sub-bacias 40 e 41, convênio 015/2000. ANEEL – 013/CPRM/2000, Relatório Final, Belo Horizonte.
   Google Scholar
• De Vente, J., et al., 2008. Spatially distributed modelling of soil erosion and sediment yield at regional scales in Spain. Global and Planetary Change, 60, 393–415. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, M.A.R., Cabezas, F., and Bermúdez, F.L., 1992. Erosion and fluvial sedimentation in the river Segura basin (Spain). Catena, 19, 379–392. doi: 10.1016/0341-8162(92)90010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didoné, E.J., Minella, J.P.G., and Merten, G.H., 2015. Quantifying soil erosion and sediment yield in a catchment in southern Brazil and implications for land conservation. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15, 2334–2346. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1160-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durães, M.F. and Mello, C.R., 2014. Hydrosedimentologic disturbance index applied to watersheds of Minas Gerais state. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38 (1), 61–67. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542014000100007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebisemiju, F.S., 1990. Sediment delivery ratio prediction equations for short catchment slopes in a humid tropical environment. Journal of Hydrology, 114, 191–208. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90081-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, B., 2003. Estimating soil erosion using RUSLE - using Arcview. Indianapolis: Purdue University. Available from: http://pasture.ecn.purdue.edu/~engelb/agen526/gisrusle/gisrusle.html [Access 21 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute), 2004. ArcGIS: getting started with ArcGIS. Redlands, CA: ESRI, 265 p.
   Google Scholar
• Farinasso, M., et al., 2006. Avaliação qualitativa do potencial de erosão laminar em grandes áreas por meio da EUPS utilizando novas metodologias em SIG para cálculos dos seus fatores na região do Alto Parnaíba PI-MA. Revista Brasileira de Geomorfologia, 7, 73–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, V. and Minacapilli, M., 1995. Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 40 (6), 703–717. doi: 10.1080/02626669509491460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K. and Brierley, G.J., 2001. Variability in sediment delivery and storage along river courses in Bega catchment, NSW, Australia: implications for geomorphic river recovery. Geomorphology, 38, 237–265. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00093-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, M., et al., 2013. Parana river morphodynamics in the contexto of climate change. International Journal of River Basin Management, 11 (4), 423–437. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2013.826234
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.O., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (2), 135–143. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimann, M., et al., 2014. An integrated suspended sediment transport monitoring and analysis concept. International Journal of Sediment Research, 29, 135–148. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6279(14)60030-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., Gomez, B., and Trustrum, N.A., 2004. Event suspended sediment characteristics and the generation of hyperpycnal plumes a river mouths: east coast continental margin, North Island, New Zealand. The Journal of Geology, 112, 471–485. doi: 10.1086/421075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2014. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai, M., et al., 2001. Estimation of temporally averaged sediment delivery ratio using aggredational terraces in headwater catchmentes of the Waipaoa river, North Island, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26, 1–16. doi: 10.1002/1096-9837(200101)26:1<1::AID-ESP146>3.0.CO;2-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazimierski, L., et al., 2013. Impact of climate change on sediment yield from the upper Plata basin. International Journal of River Basin Management, 11 (4), 411–421. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2013.828066
   Google Scholar
• Kouli, M., Soupios, P., and Vallianatos, F., 2009. Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environmental Geology, 57, 483–497. doi: 10.1007/s00254-008-1318-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. and Lee, K., 2010. Determining the sediment delivery ratio using the sediment-rating curve and a geographical information system-embedded soil erosion model on a basin scale. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 834–843. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K.J., et al., 2005. GIS based sediment assessment tool. Catena, 64, 61–80. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2005.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Moran, C.J., and Prosser, I.P., 2006. Modelling sediment delivery ratio over the Murray Darling Basin. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, 1297–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, S.B., 1958. Factors affecting sediment delivery ratios in the red hills physiographic area. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 39, 669–675. doi: 10.1029/TR039i004p00669
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J.J.G.S.M., et al., 1997. Adequação de métodos indiretos para estimativa da erodibilidade de solos com horizonte B textural no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 21, 447–456. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06831997000300014
   Google Scholar
• Martins, S.G., et al., 2010. Fator cobertura e manejo do solo e perdas de solo e água em cultivo de eucalipto e em Mata Atlântica nos Tabuleiros Costeiros do estado do Espírito Santo. Scientia Forestalis, 38, 517–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, C.R., et al., 2013. Multivariate models for annual rainfall erosivity in Brazil. Geoderma, 202–203, 88–102. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, C.R., et al., 2015. Assessing the climate change impacts on the rainfall erosivity throughout the twenty-first century in the Grande River Basin (GRB) headwaters, Southeastern Brazil. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 8683–8698. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minella, J.P.G., et al., 2008. Estimating suspended sediment concentrations from turbidity measurements and the calibration problem. Hydrological Processes, 22, 1819–1830. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, I.D. and Burch, G.J., 1986. Modeling erosion and deposition: topographic effects. Transactions of the ASAE, 29, 1624–1630. doi: 10.13031/2013.30363
   Google Scholar
• Moore, I. and Wilson, J.P., 1992. Length slope factor for the revised universal soil loss equation: simplified method of solution. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 47 (4), 423–428.
   Google Scholar
• Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi: 10.13031/2013.23153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, V.A., et al., 2014. Soil erosion vulnerability in the Verde river basin, southern Minas Gerais. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 38 (3), 262–269. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542014000300006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onori, F., De Bonis, P., and Grauso, S., 2006. Soil erosion prediction at the basin scale using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a catchment of Sicily (southern Italy). Environmental Geology, 50, 1129–1140. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0286-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y.S., et al., 2007. Analysis of sediment yields at watershed scale using area/slope-based sediment delivery ratio in SATEEC. Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, 23 (5), 650–658.
   Google Scholar
• Parveen, R. and Kumar, U., 2012. Integrated approach of universal soil loss equation (USLE) and geographical information system (GIS) for soil loss risk assessment in Upper South Koel Basin, Jharkhand. Journal of Geographic Information System, 4, 588–596. doi: 10.4236/jgis.2012.46061
   Google Scholar
• Renard, K.G., et al., 1991. RUSLE: revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46 (1), 30–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renard, K.G., et al., 1997. Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE). United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service (USDA-RS) Handbook n. 703. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Roehl, J.E., 1962. Sediment source areas, and delivery ratios influencing morphological factors. International Association of Hydrology Science, 59, 202–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sabino, C.V.S., et al., 2008. Análise de alguns aspectos da qualidade da água da bacia do rio Paraopeba utilizando estatística multivariada. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra, 8 (2), 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, C.G., 2013. Erosão hídrica e taxa de entrega de sedimentos na bacia hidrográfica semiária do riacho Exú, PE, 109 p. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência do Solo). Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife.
   Google Scholar
• Scapin, J., Paiva, J.B.D., and Beling, F.A., 2007. Avaliação de métodos de cálculo do transporte de sedimentos em um pequeno rio urbano. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, 12 (4), 5–21. doi: 10.21168/rbrh.v12n4.p5-21
   Google Scholar
• Silva, V.C., 2004. Estimativa da erosão atual da bacia do rio Paracatu (MG/GO/DF). Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 34, 147–159.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M.L.N., et al., 1997. Relação entre parâmetros da chuva e perdas de solo e determinação da erodibilidade de um Latossolo Vermelho-Escuro em Goiânia (GO). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 21, 131–137.
   Google Scholar
• USDA-SCS, 1979. United States Department of Agriculture – Soil Conservation Service. National engineering handbook, Section 4. Hydrology. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompaey, A., Krasa, J., and Dostal, T., 2007. Modelling the impact of land cover changes in the Czech Republic on sediment delivery. Land Use Policy, 24, 576–583. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanoni, V.A., 1975. Sedimentation engineering. Reston: ASCE Manuals & Report on Eng., 405 p. (Practice, 54).
   Google Scholar
• Verstraeten, G., Prosser, I.P., and Fogarty, P., 2007. Predicting the spatial patterns of hillslope sediment delivery to river channels in the Murrumbidgee catchment, Australia. Journal of Hydrology, 334 (3–4), 440–454. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walling, D.E., 1983. The sediment delivery problem. Journal of Hydrology, 65, 209–237. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(83)90217-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walling, D.E. and Webb, B.W., 1981. The reliability of suspended sediment load data. Erosion and sediment transport measurement. Proceeding of the Florence Symposium, IAHS Publication Number 174, June 1981, Florence, IT, 337–350.
   Google Scholar
• Walling, D.E., and Webb, B.W., 1987. Suspended load in gravel-bed rivers: UK experience. In: C.R. Thorne, J.C. Bathhurst, & R.D. Hey, eds. Sediment transport in gravel-bed rivers. Chichester: Wiley, 691–723.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L.L., Yao, W.Y., and Liu, Y.L., 2008. China’s research progress in sediment delivery ratio of watershed. Yellow River, 30 (9), 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J.R. and Berndt, H.D., 1972. Sediment yield computed with universal equation. Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 98 (2), 2087–2098.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, C.J. and Wicks, D.E., 1980. An empirical method for the spatial interpolation of monthly precipitation within California. Physical Geography, 1, 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wischmeier, W.H. and Smith, D.D., 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservation planning, agricultural handbook 537. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Science and Education Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, L., et al., 2012. Simulation of soil loss processes based on rainfall runoff and the time factor of governance in the Jialing river watershed, China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184 (6), 3731–3748. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2220-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W. and Wu, B., 2008. Assessment of soil erosion and sediment delivery ratio using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of upstream Chaobaihe river catchment, North China. International Journal of Sediment Research, 23, 167–173. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6279(08)60016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar