Temporal development of flood risk considering settlement dynamics and local flood protection measures on catchment scale: an Austrian case study

References

• Abbott, M.B., 1979. Computational hydraulics: elements of the theory of free-surface flows. London: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Achleitner, S., et al., 2010. Sensing the uncertainty of cumulative flood damages due to various flood peak probability distributions in a Monte-Carlo based modelling framework. First European IAHR Congress, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, D. and Schüttrumpf, H., 2014. Risikobasierte Bewertung von Hochwasserschutzmaßnahmen mit unterschiedlichen Wirkungsweisen auf den Hochwasserschutz (Risk-based evaluation of flood defense measures with different effect on flood protection). Der Bauingenieur, 89( 07/08-2014), 283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K., et al., 2013. Communicating uncertainty in flood risk mapping. In: F. Klijn and T. Schweckendieck, eds. Comprehensive flood risk management: research for policy and practice. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 369–372.
   Google Scholar
• Borter, P., et al., 1999a. Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren: Band 1: Methoden, 107/I. Bern : Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BUWAL Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Borter, P., et al., 1999b. Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren: Band 2: Fallbeispiele und Daten, 107/II. Bern : Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft BUWAL Bern.
   Google Scholar
• de Bruijn, K.M., Diermanse, F.L.M. and Beckers, J.V.L., 2014. An advanced method for flood risk analysis in river deltas, applied to societal flood fatality risk in the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 14 (10), 2767–2781. doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-2767-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bründl, M. and Ettlin, L., 2014. Assessing the economic efficiency of local structural protection measures – prevent-building – a tool for building insurances. In: M. Fujita, et al., eds. INTERPRAEVENT international symposium 2014, ‘Natural disaster mitigation to establish society with resilience’. Nara, Japan: The Organizing Committee of Interpraevent 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Büchele, B., et al., 2006. Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 6 (4), 485–503. doi: 10.5194/nhess-6-485-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammerer, H., Thieken, A.H. and Lammel, J., 2013. Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 13 (11), 3063–3081. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-3063-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 2009. Open-channel hydraulics. Caldwell: The Blackburn Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, X. and Steinman, A., 2009. Event and continuous hydrologic modeling with HEC-HMS. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 135 (1), 119–124. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:1(119)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunge, J.A., 1969. On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7 (2), 205–230. doi: 10.1080/00221686909500264
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, R., et al., 2005. Sampling-based flood risk analysis for fluvial dike systems. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 19 (6), 388–402. doi: 10.1007/s00477-005-0010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delenne, C., Cappelaere, B. and Guinot, V., 2012. Uncertainty analysis of river flooding and dam failure risks using local sensitivity computations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 107, 171–183. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DESTATIS – Statistische Bundesamt Deutschland, 2013. Building cost index-Germany New Construction (conventional construction type) of residential and non-residential buildings (Baupreisindizes-Deutschland. Neubau (konventionelle Bauart) von Wohn- und Nichtwohngebäuden) [online]. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Indikatoren/Konjunkturindikatoren/Preise/bpr110.html [Accessed 15 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Domeneghetti, A., et al., 2013. Probabilistic flood hazard mapping: effects of uncertain boundary conditions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17 (8), 3127–3140. doi: 10.5194/hess-17-3127-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU/2007/60/EC, 2007. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. EU/2007/60/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, 288, 227–234.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT, 2013. European Commission – The European Statistics (Europäische Kommission. Die Europäische Statistik) [online] http://http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ [Accessed 15 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Falter, D., et al., 2015. Spatially coherent flood risk assessment based on long-term continuous simulation with a coupled model chain. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 182–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gems, B., et al., 2009. Flood control management for an alpine valley in Tyrol – an integrated hydrological-hydraulic approach. 33rd Congress of the International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research (IAHR), ‘Water for a Sustainable Environment’. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: IAHR/IWA, 1779–1786.
   Google Scholar
• HEC-HMS, 2010. HEC-HMS Hydrological Modeling System – user’s manual v3.5. US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Holub, M., et al., 2011. Naturgefahren-Risiko aus Sicht des Versicherers. Wildbach- und Lawinenverbau, 75 (167), 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hübl, J. and Kraus, D., 2004. Erweiterungsvorschläge zur Kosten – Nutzen – Untersuchung der Wildbach- und Lawinenverbauung, WLS Report 94. Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Humer, G., 2008. Niederschlags-Abfluss-Modell im Rahmen des Gefahrenzonenplans Ottnanger Redl – Oberlauf (GZ 065212-01b). Geboltskirchen: Ingenieurbüro Günter Humer.
   Google Scholar
• Huttenlau, M. and Stötter, J., 2011. The structural vulnerability in the framework of natural hazard risk analyses and the exemplary application for storm loss modelling in Tyrol (Austria). Natural Hazards, 58 (2), 705–729. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-9768-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlau, M., Stötter, J. and Stiefelmeyer, H., 2010. Risk-based damage potential and loss estimation of extreme flooding scenarios in the Austrian Federal Province of Tyrol. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10 (12), 2451–2473. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-2451-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlau, M., et al., 2015. Analysis of loss-probability-relation on community level – a contribution to a comprehensive flood risk assessment. 4th International Conference on Disaster Management and Human Health: Reducing Risk, Improving Outcomes, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment. Istanbul, Turkey: Wessex Institue (in press).
   Google Scholar
• IKSE, 2003. Aktionsplan Hochwasserschutz Elbe. Magdeburg: IKSE – Internationale Kommission zum Schutz der Elbe.
   Google Scholar
• IKSR, 2001. Atlas der Überschwemmungsgefährdung und möglichen Schäden bei Extremhochwasser am Rhein. Koblenz : Internationale Kommission zum Schutz des Rheins IKSR.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., et al., 2007. Overstromingsrisico’s in Nederland in een veranderend klimaat. Milieu- en Natuur planbureau (MNP).
   Google Scholar
• Kranewitter, H., 2002. Liegenschaftsbewertung (property evaluation). Wien: GESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Kreibich, H., et al., 2009. Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling? Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 9 (5), 1679–1692. doi: 10.5194/nhess-9-1679-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LBGl. Nr. 35/2013, 2013. Landesgesetz über die bautechnischen Anforderungen an Bauwerke und Bauprodukte (Oö. Bautechnikgesetz 2013 – Oö. BauTG 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Merz, R., Blöschl, G. and Humer, G., 2008. National flood discharge mapping in Austria. Natural Hazards, 46 (1), 53–72. doi: 10.1007/s11069-007-9181-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, B., et al., 2010. Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10 (3), 509–527. doi: 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, V. and Messner, F., 2007. Guidelines for direct, tangible flood damage evaluation. In: F. Messner, et al., eds. Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods principles and methods, 22–73. FLOODsite Project Deliverable D9.1 (www.floodsite.net), Contract No:GOCE-CT-2004-505420, Co-ordinator: HR Wallingford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mikovits, C., Rauch, W. and Kleidorfer, M., 2014. Dynamics in urban development, population growth and their influences on urban water infrastructure. Procedia Engineering, 70, 1147–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.127
   Google Scholar
• MURL, 2000. Hochwasserschadenpotenziale am Rhein in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Abschlussbericht. Aachen: Ministerium für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen.
   Google Scholar
• Nujic, M., 2009. Hydro_AS-2D – Ein zweidimensionales Strömungsmodell für die wasserwirtschaftliche Praxis. Benutzerhandbuch.
   Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer, S., et al., 2007. Vulnerabilitätsanalyse und monetäre Schadensbewertung von Wildbachereignissen in Österreich. Wien: BFW – Bundesausbildungs- und Forschungszentrum für Wald, Naturgefahren und Landschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Oberösterreichische Versicherung AG, 2011. Assessment guidelines for commerial buildings (Gebäudebewertungs- Richtlinien. Gewerbe) 01.10.2011. Linz.
   Google Scholar
• Oberösterreichische Versicherung AG, 2012a. Private residential building – assessment guidelines (Eigenheim – ZuHause- Bewertungsrichtlinien). Linz.
   Google Scholar
• Oberösterreichische Versicherung AG, 2012b. Assessment of buildings on agricultural properties (Bewertung der Gebäude von landwirtschaftlichen Liegenschaften). Linz.
   Google Scholar
• ÖROK, 2010. Kleinräumige Bevölkerungsprognose für Österreich 2010–2030 mit Ausblick bis 2050 (“ÖROK-Prognosen”), Teil 1: Endbericht zur Bevölkerungsprognose. Wien: Österreichische Raumordnungskonferenz ÖROK.
   Google Scholar
• Plörer, M., et al., 2012. Uncertainty in 2D flood plain modeling concerning varying distribution of tributary bed loads and rainfall. In: R. Murillo Muñoz, ed. River Flow 2012 – International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics. San José, Costa Rica: Taylor & Francis, 1203–1210.
   Google Scholar
• Roberson, J.A., Cassidy, J.J. and Chaudhry, M.H., 1995. Hydraulic engineering. New York: John Wiley Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sachwertrichtlinie – SW-RL, 2012. Richtlinie zur Ermittlung des Sachwerts (Sachwertrichtlinie – SW-RL) 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schimek-Hickisch, O. and Glinsner, F., 2013. Machlanddamm – Objektschutz vor Hochwasser (Machland Dyke – protection of buildings against floods). Österreichische Ingenieur- und Architekten-Zeitschrift, 158( 1-12/2013), 153–164.
   Google Scholar
• Schneeberger, K., Huttenlau, M. and Stötter, J., 2015. Probabilistisches Modell zur Analyse des räumlich differenzierten Hochwasserrisikos. HyWa – Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung (accepted in print).
   Google Scholar
• Statistik Austria, 2013. Building cost index for structural engineering (Baupreisindex für den Hochbau) [online]. Available from: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/wirtschaft/preise/baupreisindex/020628.html [Accessed 7 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Steinnocher, K., Knötig, G. and Köstl, M., 2004. Untersuchung der Siedlungsentwicklung in Relation zu Flächenverbrauch und Haushaltsentwicklung im Oberösterreichischen Zentralraum. In: M. Schrenk, ed. CORP 2004 & Geomultimedia 04. Tagungsband/ Proceedings. Treffpunkt der PlanerInnen. Wien: Technischen Universität Wien, 695–700.
   Google Scholar
• Thieken, A.H., Apel, H. and Merz, B., 2015. Assessing the probability of large-scale flood loss events: a case study for the river Rhine, Germany. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 8 (3), 247–262. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, G., 2014. Flood risk assessment: concepts, modelling, applications. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 14 (5), 1361–1369. doi: 10.5194/nhess-14-1361-2014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA, 2004. Chapter 10 – Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4-Hydrology 10.11–10.24. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
   Google Scholar
• Vanneuville, W., et al., 2006. Impact op mens en economie t.g.v. overstromingen bekeken in het licht van wijzigende hydraulische condities, omgevingsfactoren en klimatologische omstandigheden. Gent: studie uitgevoerd in opdracht van de Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, MIRA, MIRA/2006/02, UGent.
   Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn, S., Apel, H. and Merz, B., 2011. The impact of the uncertainty of dike breach development time on flood hazard. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 36 (7–8), 319–323. doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorogushyn, S., et al., 2012. Analysis of a detention basin impact on dike failure probabilities and flood risk for a channel-dike-floodplain system along the river Elbe, Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 436–437, 120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WMO, 2013. Integrated flood management tools series – flood mapping No. 20. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the Global Water Partnership (GWP) [online]. http://www.apfm.info/publications/tools/APFM_Tool_20.pdf [Accessed 7 June 2015].
   Google Scholar