A stakeholder’s evaluation of collaborative processes for maintaining multi-functional floodplains: a Dutch case study

References

• Ananda, J. and Proctor, W., 2013. Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: an institutional perspective. Ecological Economics, 86, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. and Gash, A., 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18 (4), 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P. and Jack, S., 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13 (4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bentrup, G., 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in theIntermountain West. Environmental Management, 27 (5), 739–748. doi: 10.1007/s002670010184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsma, E., 2016. Changed knowledge requirements for spatial flood governance. Ecology and Society, 21 (4), article no. 40. doi: 10.5751/ES-08952-210440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W. and Schlager, E., 2005. Political pitfalls of integrated watershed management. Society & Natural Resources, 18 (2), 101–117. doi: 10.1080/08941920590894435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., 2009. Rijkswaterstaat on the horns of a dilemma. Dissertation (PhD). Radboud University of Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Crabbé, A., Wiering, M., and Liefferink, D., 2015. Adapting flood management to climate change: comparing policy frames and governance practices in the low countries. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6 (1), 55–70. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2014.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., Shindler, B., and Wright, A., 2002. Sustaining local watershed initiatives: lessons from land care and watershed councils. Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (5), 1207–1216. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et al., 2007. A framing approach to cross-disciplinary research collaboration: experiences from a large-scale research project on adaptive water management. Ecology and Society, 12 (2), article no. 14. doi: 10.5751/ES-02142-120214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et al., 2009. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62 (2), 155–193. doi: 10.1177/0018726708100356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et al., 2011. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (1), 50–75. doi: 10.1177/0020852310390108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Meijerink, S., and Runhaar, H., 2015. Editorial: the governance of adaptation to climate change as a multi-level, multi-sector and multi-actor challenge: a European comparative perspective. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 6 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2014.000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K. and Gerlak, A., 2014. Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes. Environmental Management, 54 (4), 768–781. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S., 2011. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22 (1), 1–29. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J.P., 2012. Environmental governance. Abingdon: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J.M., et al., 2013. Combining safety and nature: a multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J.M., et al., 2016. Analyzing collaborative governance through social network analysis: a case study of river management along the Waal River in The Netherlands. Environmental Management, 57 (2), 355–367. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliervoet, J.M. and van den Born, R.J.G., 2016. From implementation towards maintenance: sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1200962
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., et al., 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30 (1), 441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B., 1989. Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., 2004. Strong opposition: frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14 (3), 166–176. doi: 10.1002/casp.773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., Lawrence, T.B., and Grant, D., 2005. Discourse and collaboration: the role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30 (1), 58–77. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D. and Meijerink, S., 2014. The politics of river basin organisations: institutional design choices, coalitions and consequences. In: D. Huitema and S. Meijerink, eds. The politics of River Basin organisations: coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. and Vangen, S., 2005. Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M.T., 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37 (3), 281–320. doi: 10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusi, S., 2009. Openings towards integrated water resources management in Lao PDR. International Journal of River Basin Management, 7 (1), 23–29. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2009.9635367
   Google Scholar
• van der Keur, P., et al., 2008. Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin. Water Resources Management, 22 (11), 1677–1708. doi: 10.1007/s11269-008-9248-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D. and Pelkey, N.W., 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127 (6), 378–385. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., and Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21 (4), 645–670. doi: 10.1002/pam.10079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lieshout, M., et al., 2011. Do scale frames matter? Scale frame mismatches in the decision making process of a “mega farm” in a small Dutch Village. Ecology and Society, 16 (1), 38. doi: 10.5751/ES-04012-160138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R.D., 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41 (4), 487–500. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R.D., 2011. Beyond consensus: improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R.D. and Robinson, C.J., 2015. Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, M., 2012. Starting to untangle the web of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration: a framework for public managers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35 (6), 389–401. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2012.655527
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd Revised ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, E., Craps, M., and Pahl-Wostl, C., 2008. Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water International, 33 (3), 293–304. doi: 10.1080/02508060802275757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., 2006. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), article no. 10. doi: 10.5751/ES-01542-110110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K.B., et al., 2010. Sustaining watershed collaboratives: the issue of coordinator–board relationships. Society & Natural Resources, 23 (5), 469–484. doi: 10.1080/08941920802509079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 1990. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., et al., 2016. Improving river health: insights into initiating collaboration in a transboundary river basin. International Journal of River Basin Management, 14 (1), 119–132. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2015.1080717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, K., 2013. Finding “space for water”: crossing concrete policy thresholds in England. In: J.F. Warner, A. van Buuren, and J. Edelenbos, eds. Making space for the river: governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing, 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Raadgever, G.T., Mostert, E., and van de Giesen, N.C., 2012. Learning from collaborative research in water management practice. Water Resources Management, 26 (11), 3251–3266. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0070-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10), 2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijke, J., et al., 2012. Room for the river: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10 (4), 369–382. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2012.739173
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C.J., et al., 2011. Policy-level collaboratives for environmental management at the regional scale: lessons and challenges from Australia and the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 24 (8), 849–859. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2010.487848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S., 2005. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, S.W. and Chavez, D., 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 19 (2), 189–195. doi: 10.1007/BF02471990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, L.C., et al., 2006. Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society, 11 (2), 39. doi: 10.5751/ES-01896-110239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C.J.A.M., 2009. Barriers to new modes of horizontal governance. Public Management Review, 11 (3), 299–316. doi: 10.1080/14719030902798180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, L.N.H., et al., 2016. Implementing participatory monitoring in river management: the role of stakeholders’ perspectives and incentives. Journal of Environmental Management, 1–8. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479716309185
   Google Scholar
• Vollan, B., 2008. Socio-ecological explanations for crowding-out effects from economic field experiments in southern Africa. Ecological Economics, 67 (4), 560–573. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreugdenhil, H.S.I., 2010. Pilot projects in water management; practicing, change and changing practice. PhD. Technische universiteit Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J., 2008. Emergency river storage in the Ooij polder – a bridge too far? Forms of participation in flood preparedness policy. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24 (4), 567–582. doi: 10.1080/07900620801923153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. F., van Buuren, A., and Edelenbos, J., 2013. Making space for the river: governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J.F., Fliervoet, J.M., and Smits, A.J.M., 2016. Towards a joint maintenance approach for floodplain management in the Netherlands: tensions and possibilities. In: R.D. Margerum and C.J. Robinson, eds. The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance: barriers and responses. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 290–313.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N., 2004. Integrated river basin management: a case for collaboration. International Journal of River Basin Management, 2 (4), 243–257. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635235
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N., 2015a. Adaptation through collaboration: evaluating the emergence of institutional arrangements for catchment management and governance in England. International Journal of Water Governance, 3, 55–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, N., 2015b. Factors influencing the frames and approaches of host organizations for collaborative catchment management in England. Society & Natural Resources, 28 (4), 360–376. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.945059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K., 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wyborn, C. and Bixler, R.P., 2013. Collaboration and nested environmental governance: scale dependency, scale framing, and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. Journal of Environmental Management, 123, 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar