Estimation and calibration of Manning’s roughness coefficients for ungauged watersheds on coastal floodplains

References

• Ballesteros, J., et al., 2011. Calibration of floodplain roughness and estimation of flood discharge based on tree-ring evidence and hydraulic modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 45 (3), 103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltokoski, V., et al., 2010. Calibração de modelo para a simulação de vazão e de fósforo total nas sub-bacias dos rios Conrado e Pinheiro–Pato Branco (PR). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 34 (1), 253–261. doi: 10.1590/S0100-06832010000100026
   Google Scholar
• Barker, D.M., et al., 2009. Longitudinal distributions of river flood power: the combined automated flood, elevation and stream power (CAFES) methodology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34 (2), 280–290. doi: 10.1002/esp.1723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, H.H. Jr. 1967. Roughness characteristics of natural channels. U.S. Geological Survey Water, Supply Paper 1849, 213 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, P., et al., 1996. Analysis and development of hydraulic models for floodplain flows. In: M.G. Anderson, D.E. Walling, and P.D. Bates, eds. Floodplain processes. New York: Wiley, 215–254.
   Google Scholar
• Benaman, J., Shoemaker, C.A., and Haith, D.A., 2005. Calibration and validation of soil and water assessment tool on an agricultural watershed in upstate New York. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 10, 363–374. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:5(363)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, L.M.F.B. and Mello, L.F., 2012. Climate change, risk and vulnerability: a study of the events that occurred in 1967 and 1996 at the estuarine plains of Caraguatatuba – SP. (in Portuguese: Mudança climática, riscos e vulnerabilidade: um estudo dos eventos ocorridos em 1967 e 1996 na planície litorânea de Caraguatatuba SP. Climatologia e Estudos da Paisagem, 6, 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• CBHLN (Watershed Committee of the Northern Coast of São Paulo State), 2015. The fundamentation for charging the water use at the UGRHI 03, Northern Coast of São Paulo.(in Portuguese: Fundamentação da Cobrança pelo Uso da Água na UGRHI 03 – Litoral Norte de São Paulo). 111 p.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 680.
   Google Scholar
• Coon, W.F., 1998. Estimation of roughness coefficients for natural stream channels with vegetated banks. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2441, 133 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, W.L., 1956. Estimating hydraulic roughness coefficients. Agricultural Engineering, 37 (7), 473–475.
   Google Scholar
• EMPLASA (Metropolitan Planning Company of São Paulo), 2013. DSM of Juqueriquere river basin. São Paulo: EMPLASA (DVD), No. 0973.
   Google Scholar
• Halwatura, D. and Najim, M.M.M., 2013. Application of the HEC-HMS model for runoff simulation in a tropical catchment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 46, 155–162. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, P.M., 1966. Open-channel flow. New York: MacMillan, 522.
   Google Scholar
• Hydrologic Engineering Center, 1986. Accuracy of computed water surface profiles. Research Document 26, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hin, L.S., et al., 2008. Discharge estimation for equatorial natural rivers with overbank flow. International Journal of River Basin Management, 6(1), 13–21. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635333
   Google Scholar
• Kiesel, J., et al., 2013. Application of a hydrological-hydraulic modelling cascade in lowlands for investigating water and sediment fluxes in catchment, channel and reach. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 61 (4), 334–346. doi: 10.2478/johh-2013-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knebl, M.R., et al., 2005. Regional scale flood modelling using NEXRAD rainfall, GIS, and HEC-HMS/RAS: a case study for the San Antonio river basin summer 2002 storm event. Journal of Environmental Management, 75 (4), 325–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knighton, A.D., 1975. Variations in at-a-station hydraulic geometry. American Journal of Sciences, 275, 186–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knighton, A.D., 1999. Downstream variation in stream power. Geomorphology, 29 (3), 293–306. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00015-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lança, R.M.M., 2000. Contribution for the study of floods using a distributed model [in Portuguese: Contribuição para o estudo de cheias recorrendo a um modelo distribuído]. Dissertation. Universidade de Evora, Portugal, 142 p.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S.N., et al., 1999. The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches. Geomorphology, 29 (1–2), 1–20. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemonds, P.J. and Kasch, M., 2007. Comparison of the autocalibration tools available within SWAT 2005 and manual calibration, Proceedings … Conference on Watershed Management to Meet Water Quality Standards and TMDLS, San Antonio, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, J., et al., 2000. Rating curve modelling with Manning’s equation to manage instability and improve extrapolation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45 (5), 739–750. doi: 10.1080/02626660009492374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limerinos, J.T., 1970. Determination of the manning coefficient from measured bed roughness in natural channels. U.S. Geological Survey Water, Supply Paper 1898-B, 47 p.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, W.A., et al., 1992. An evaluation of methods for estimating Manning’s n in small mountain streams. Mountain Research and Development, 12 (3), 227–239. doi: 10.2307/3673667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, K. and Bates, P., 2000. Integration of high-resolution topographic data with floodplain flow models. Hydrological Processes, 14 (11–12), 2109–2122. doi: 10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2109::AID-HYP58>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirauda, D. and Greco, M., 2014. Assessment of rating curve through entropy-based Manning’s equation, Proceedings … WSEAS – Energy, Environmental and Structural Engineering Series Conference, Salermo, Italy, 141–147.
   Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., et al., 2005. Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations. Journal of Hydrology, 302 (1), 46–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhi, P.K., Sankhua, R.N., and Roy, G.P., 2012. Calibration of channel roughness for Mahanadi river (India) using HEC-RAS model. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 4 (10), 847–850. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2012.410098
   Google Scholar
• Patro, S., et al., 2009. Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37 (1), 107–118. doi: 10.1007/s12524-009-0002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ree, W.O., 1954. Handbook of channel design for soil and water conservation: Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, SCS-TP-61, 40 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, D.D. (1978). World-wide variations in hydraulic geometry exponents of stream channels: An analysis and some observations-comments. Journal of Hydrology, 39 (1–2), 193–197. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(78)90123-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanowicz, R., Beven, K.J., and Tawn, J., 1996. Bayesian calibration of flood inundation models. In: M.G. Anderson, Walling, D.E., Bates, P.D. (Eds.), Floodplain Processes. New York: John Wiley, 333–360.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S., Schmalz, B., and Fohrer, N., 2014. Simulation and comparison of stream power in-channel and on the floodplain in a German lowland area. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62 (2), 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Streeter, V.L., 1971. Fluid mechanics. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 705.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P., 2011. Rating curve and gauging information. Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report series. CSIRO, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia, 28 p.
   Google Scholar
• Timbadiya, P.V., Patel, P.L., and Porey, P.D., 2011. Calibration of HEC-RAS model on prediction of flood for lower tapi river, India. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 3 (11), 805–811. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2011.311090
   Google Scholar
• Tucci, C.E., 2005. Hydrological Models (in Portuguese: Modelos hidrológicos). UFRGS, ABRH, 678 p.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderkimpen, P., Melger, E., and Peeters, P., 2008. Flood modelling for risk evaluation: a MIKE FLOOD vs. SOBEK 1D2D benchmark study. In: Samuels et al. (eds). Flood risk management: research and practice. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2010. Estimation of design discharge for an ungauged overflow-receiving watershed using one-dimensional hydrodynamic model. International Journal of River Basin Management, 8 (1), 79–92. doi: 10.1080/15715121003714886
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E.E., 1998. Uncertainty in flood estimates associated with roughness coefficient. Journal of Hydraulical Engineering, 124 (2), 219–223. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:2(219)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, B.C., 1992. Dimensionally homogeneous Manning’s formula. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 118 (9), 1326–1332. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:9(1326)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar