Expanding the horizons of integrated flood risk management: a critical analysis from an Irish perspective

References

• Adger, N., 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24, 347–364. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, W.N., 2003. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79 (4), 387–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger, W.N., 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhakami, A.S. and Slovic, P., 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14 (6), 1085–1096. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T., 2012. The risk concept – historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 99, 33–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., et al., 2016. Exploring the spatial dimension of community-level flood risk perception: a cognitive mapping approach. Environmental Hazards, 15 (4), 279–310. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2016.1202807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, C., et al., 2015. ADAPT: Quantifying the costs and benefits associated with climate change risks and adaptation. Wexford: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Research Report No. 140.
   Google Scholar
• CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General), 2015. Strategic planning for flood risk management. Dublin: Comptroller and Auditor General, Report Number 92.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of European Communities), 2007. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, 6 November. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities, L 288.
   Google Scholar
• Challies, E., et al., 2016. Participatory and collaborative governance for sustainable flood risk management: an emerging research agenda. Environmental Science and Policy, 55 (2), 275–280. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cork City Council, 2008. South docks local area plan. Cork: Cork City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. and Jackson, M., 2013. Social science perspectives on natural hazards risk and uncertainty. In: J. Rougier, S. Sparks, and L. J. Hill, eds. Risk and uncertainty assessment for natural hazards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 502–547.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, J.E., 1978. The dilemma of flood control in the United States. Environmental Management, 2 (4), 313–322. doi: 10.1007/BF01866671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J.W., et al., 2014. The prospects and problems of integrating sketch maps with geographic information systems to understand environmental perception: a case study of mapping youth fear in Los Angeles gang neighbourhoods. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41, 251–271. doi: 10.1068/b38151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, K.M., 2004. Resilience and flood risk management. Water Policy, 6, 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• DEFRA (Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2005. Making space for water: taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. London: Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Devitt, C. and O’Neill, E., 2016. The framing of two major flood episodes in the Irish print news media: Implications for societal adaptation to living with flood risk. Public Understanding of Science [Online], p.0963662516636041.
   Google Scholar
• Di Baldassarre, G., et al., 2015. Debates – perspectives on socio-hydrology: capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resources Research, 51 (6), 4770–4781. doi: 10.1002/2014WR016416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoECLG, 2010. Towards integrated emergency management: a report on the review of the response to exceptional severe events of 2009–2010. Dublin: Department of Environment, Community and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• DoEHLG, 2008. A framework for major emergency management. Dublin: Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• DoEHLG and OPW, 2009. The planning system and flood risk management: guidelines for planning authorities. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dublin City Council, 2016. Clontarf flood defence scheme. Available from: www.dublincity.ie/clontarfflooddefence [Accessed 16 September 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E.P., et al., 2004a. Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 1: future risks and their drivers. London: Office of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E.P., et al., 2004b. Foresight future flooding, scientific summary: volume 2: managing future risks. London: Office of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B., et al., 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9 (2), 127–152. doi: 10.1007/BF00143739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., Lynch, K., and Ó Cinnéide, M., 2015. Consideration of coastal risk in the Irish spatial planning process. Land Use Policy, 43, 161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2007. Policy and planning for large-infrastructure projects: problems, causes, cures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (4), 578–597. doi: 10.1068/b32111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., et al., 2016. Is there really nothing you can do? Pathways to enhanced flood-risk preparedness. Journal of Hydrology, 543 (Part B), 330–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S.R.J., et al., 2014. Are coastal managers detecting the problem? Assessing stakeholder perception of climate vulnerability using fuzzy cognitive mapping. Ocean and Coastal Management, 94, 74–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., et al., 2016. Strengthening coastal adaptation planning through scenario analysis: a beneficial but incomplete solution. Marine Policy [Online]. In Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J.W., et al., 2003. Integrated flood risk management in England and Wales. Natural Hazards Review, 4 (3), 126–135. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(126)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. and Spit, T., 2016. Implementing the European flood risk management plan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 59 (2), 360–377. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2015.1012581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, K., 2010. Deluge: Ireland’s weather disasters 2009–2010. Dublin: Four Courts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. and White, I., 2002. The potential implications of the European Union Water Framework Directive on domestic planning systems: a UK study. European Planning Studies, 10 (8), 1027–1038. doi: 10.1080/0965431022000031293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2013. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M. Midgley, eds]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1535.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers, J., 2011. The Cork city flood of November 2009: lessons for flood risk management and climate change adaptation at the urban scale. Irish Geography, 44 (1), 61–80. doi: 10.1080/00750778.2011.615283
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers, J., 2013a. Integrating vulnerability analysis and risk assessment in flood loss mitigation: an evaluation of barriers and challenges based on evidence from Ireland. Applied Geography, 37, 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers, J., 2013b. Double exposures and decision making: adaptation policy and planning in Ireland’s coastal cities during a boom-bust cycle. Environment and Planning A, 45, 1436–1454. doi: 10.1068/a45386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers, J., 2014. Environmental knowledge and human experience: using a historical analysis of flooding in Ireland to challenge contemporary risk narratives and develop creative policy alternatives. Environmental Hazards, 13 (3), 229–247. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2014.902800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, B., et al., 2014. Increasing stress on disaster-risk finance due to large floods. Nature Climate Change, 4, 264–228. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S., 2012. Disasters: contributions of hazardscape and gaps in response practices. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 12, 3775–3787. doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-3775-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, F., et al., 2015. Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20 (6), 845–864. doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9638-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laszlo, A. and Krippner, S., 1998. Systems theories: their origins, foundations, and development. In: J.S. Jordan, ed. Systems theories and a priori aspects of perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, Ch. 3, 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., Scott, M., and O’Neill, E., 2014. Urban design and adapting to flood risk: the role of green infrastructure. Journal of Urban Design, 19 (5), 745–758. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2014.944113
   Google Scholar
• Lieske, D.L., 2012. Towards a framework for designing spatial and non-spatial visualizations for communicating climate change risks. Geomatica, 66 (1), 27–36. doi: 10.5623/cig2012-006
   Google Scholar
• Lohan, R., 1994. The archives of the Office of Public Works and their value for local history. Journal of the Irish Society for Archives, Autumn.
   Google Scholar
• Ludy, J. and Kondolf, G.M., 2012. Flood risk perception in lands ‘protected’ by 100-year levees. Natural Hazards, 61 (2), 829–842. doi: 10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mens, J.P.M., et al., 2011. The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management. Environmental Science and Policy, 14, 1121–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, S.-K., et al., 2011. Human contribution to more intense precipitation extremes, Nature, 470: 378–381. doi: 10.1038/nature09763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montz, B. and Gruntfest, E.C., 1986. Changes in American urban floodplain occupancy since 1958: the experiences of nine cities. Applied Geography, 6 (4), 325–338. doi: 10.1016/0143-6228(86)90034-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, E. and Scott, M., 2011. Policy and planning brief: adapting to climate change - a European Union policy agenda. Planning Theory and Practice, 12 (2), 312–317. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2011.583146
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, E., et al., 2015. Exploring a spatial statistical approach to quantify flood risk perception using cognitive maps. Natural Hazards, 76 (3), 1573–1601. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1559-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, E., et al., 2016. The impact of perceived flood exposure on flood-risk perception: the role of distance. Risk Analysis 36 (11), 2158–2186. doi: 10.1111/risa.12597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OPW (Office of Public Works), 2004. Report of the flood policy review group. Dublin: Office of Public Works.
   Google Scholar
• OPW, 2016. Catchment flood risk management programme. Available from: www.cfram.ie [Accessed 20 October 2016].
   Google Scholar
• OPW, Cork City Council, Cork County Council, 2014. Lee catchment flood risk assessment and management study: catchment flood risk management plan. Dublin: Office of Public Works.
   Google Scholar
• Pagneux, E., Gísladóttir, G. and Jónsdóttir, S., 2011. Public perception of flood hazard and flood risk in Iceland: a case study in a watershed prone to ice-jam floods. Natural Hazards, 58 (1), 269–287. doi: 10.1007/s11069-010-9665-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pall, P., et al., 2011. Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contributions to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470: 382–385. doi: 10.1038/nature09762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., et al., 2013. Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Analysis, 33 (3): 356–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01885.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E.C., et al., 2013. From flood science to flood policy: the foresight future flooding project seven years on. Foresight, 15 (3), 190–210. doi: 10.1108/fs-06-2012-0046
   Google Scholar
• PER (Department of Public Expenditure and Reform), 2012. The public spending code D. Standard analytical procedures: guide to economic appraisal: Carrying out a cost benefit analysis. Dublin: Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. Available from: http://publicspendingcode.per.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/D03-Guide-to-economic-appraisal-CBA-16-July.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R.A., 1999. Nine fallacies of floods. Climatic Change, 42 (2), 413–438. doi: 10.1023/A:1005457318876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restall, B. and Conrad, E., 2015. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 159, 264–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, M.I., et al., 2014. Planning criteria for water sensitive urban design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 1, 1579–1591. doi: 10.2495/SC141342
   Google Scholar
• RvR (Ruimte voor de Rivier), 2012. Room for the river. March 2012. Available from: https://www.ruimtevoorderivier.nl/english/.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W., et al., 2007. Strengthening linkages between land-use planning and emergency management in New Zealand. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22 (1), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., Galloway, G., and Hall, J., 2012. Robust decision making under uncertainty – towards adaptive and resilient flood risk management infrastructure. In: Flood risk: planning, design and management of flood defence infrastructure. London: ICE Publishing, 281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, P., et al., 2015. Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach. International Journal of River Basin Management, 13 (2), 137–151. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2014.902378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, P.B., Hall, J.W., and Meadowcroft, I.C., 2002. Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK. Proceedings of institute of civil engineers: civil engineering 150, paper 12803, London, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, N., et al., 2016. Human influence on climate in the 2014 Southern England winter floods and their impacts. Nature Climate Change, 6 (6), 627–634. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanze, J., 2006. Flood risk management: a basic framework. In: J. Schanze, E. Zeman and J. Marsalek, eds. Flood risk management: hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., 2013. Resilience: a conceptual lens for rural studies? Geography Compass, 7, 597–610. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12066
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., et al., 2013. Living with flood risk/The more we know, the more we know we don’t know: reflections on a decade of planning, flood risk management and false precision/Searching for resilience or building social capacities for flood risks?/Participatory floodplain management: lessons from Bangladesh/Planning and retrofitting for floods: insights from Australia/Neighbourhood design considerations in flood risk management/Flood risk management – challenges to the effective implementation of a paradigm shift. Planning Theory & Practice, 14 (1), 103–140. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2012.761904
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2006a. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment and management of floods: COM/2006/0015. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• SEC, 2006b. Environment: Commission adopts new directive to fight floods: IP/06/50. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. and Gutscher, H., 2006. Flooding risks: A comparison of lay people's perceptions and expert's assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis, 26 (4), 971–979. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H., and Blöschl, G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: a new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26 (8), 1270–1276. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L. and Vlek, C., 2009. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: an integrative review and research agenda. Journal of environmental psychology, 29 (3), 309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M.R., Song, Y., and Berke, P.R., 2010. New urbanist developments in flood-prone areas: safe development or safe development paradox? Natural Hazards, 53, 605–629. doi: 10.1007/s11069-009-9450-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J.R., 2001. Gone barefoot lately? American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 20, 243–244. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00319-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, A.G., 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16, 284–307. doi: 10.2307/1930070
   Google Scholar
• Tyrrell, J.G. and Hickey, K.R., 1992. A flood chronology for Cork City and its climatological background. Irish Geography, 24 (2): 81–90. doi: 10.1080/00750779109555764
   Google Scholar
• UCC v. ESB [2015]: IEHC 598; 2012/129P (5 October). 2015.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Disaster Relief Office (UNDRO), 1991. Mitigating natural disasters: phenomena, effects and options – A manual for policy makers and planners. Geneva: UNDRO.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, D., et al., 2012. Living with nuclear power: sense of place, proximity, and risk perceptions in local host communities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32 (4), 371–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, A., et al., 2014. Insights from socio-hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk–roles of collective memory, risk-taking attitude and trust. Journal of Hydrology, 518, 71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilar, E., et al., 2013. The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Applied Ergonomics, 44, 618–627. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werritty, A., 2006. Sustainable flood management: oxymoron or new paradigm? Area, 38, 16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00658.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, I., 2008. The absorbent city: urban form and flood risk management. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, London, 151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, K., Lei, Z. and Dihua, L., 2008. Living with water: flood adaptive landscapes in the Yellow River Basin of China. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 3 (2), 6–17. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2008.9723400
   Google Scholar