442
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Assessment of variable source area hydrological models in humid tropical watersheds

ORCID Icon &
Pages 145-156 | Received 27 Dec 2016, Accepted 22 Aug 2017, Published online: 20 Sep 2017

References

  • Arnold, J.G., et al., 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34 (1), 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
  • Beven, K.J., 1997. Distributed hydrological modelling: applications of the topmodel concept. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J., 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24 (1), 43–69. doi: 10.1080/02626667909491834
  • Bieger, K., Hörmann, G., and Fohrer, N., 2014. Detailed spatial analysis of SWAT-simulated surface runoff and sediment yield in a mountainous watershed in China. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60 (5), 784–800.
  • Calder, I.R., Hall, R.L., and Adlard, P.G., 1992. Growth and water use of forest plantations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Crist, E.P., 1985. A TM tasseled cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 17 (3), 301–306. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(85)90102-6
  • Dahlke, H., et al., 2012. Field test of the variable source area interpretation of the curve number rainfall-runoff equation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138 (3), 235–244. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000380
  • De Alwis, D.A., et al., 2007. Unsupervised classification of saturated areas using a time series of remotely sensed images. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11 (5), 1609–1620. doi: 10.5194/hess-11-1609-2007
  • Du, J., et al., 2013. Hydrological simulation by SWAT model with fixed and varied parameterization approaches under land use change. Water Resources Management, 27 (8), 2823–2838. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0317-0
  • Easton, Z.M., et al., 2008. Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areas. Journal of Hydrology, 348 (3–4), 279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.008
  • Fang, X., et al., 2013. Hydrologic response to land use and land cover changes within the context of catchment-scale spatial information. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18 (11), 1539–1548. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000482
  • Frankenberger, J.R., et al., 1999. A GIS-based variable source area hydrology model. Hydrological Processes, 13 (6), 805–822. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19990430)13:6<805::AID-HYP754>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Freer, J., et al., 1997. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchments. Hydrological Processes, 11 (9), 1347–1352. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199707)11:9<1347::AID-HYP592>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Gao, B.C., 1996. NDWI – a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58 (3), 257–266. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00067-3
  • Githui, F., Mutua, F., and Bauwens, W., 2009. Estimating the impacts of land-cover change on runoff using the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT): case study of Nzoia catchment, Kenya. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (5), 899–908. doi: 10.1623/hysj.54.5.899
  • Grabs, T., et al., 2009. Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: a comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. Journal of Hydrology, 373 (1–2), 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.031
  • Gupta, H.V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P., 1999. Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4 (2), 135–143. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)
  • Hawkins, R.H., 1979. Runoff curve numbers form partial area watersheds. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 105 (4), 375–389.
  • Hewlett, J.D. and Hibbert, A.R., 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. Forest Hydrology, 275–290.
  • Hewlett, J.D. and Nutter, W.L., 1970. The varying source area of streamflow from upland basins. Proceedings of the symposium on interdisciplinary aspects of watershed management, 3–6 August 1970, Bozeman, MT. New York: ASCE, 65–83.
  • Jayakrishnan, R., et al., 2005. Advances in the application of the SWAT model for water resources management. Hydrological Processes, 19 (3), 749–762. doi: 10.1002/hyp.5624
  • Jha, C.S., Dutt, C.B.S., and Bawa, K.S., 2000. Deforestation and land use changes in Western Ghats, India. Current Science, 79 (2), 231–238.
  • Kauth, R.J. and Thomas, G.S., 1976. The tasselled cap – a graphic description of the spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. Symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data, 29 June–1 July 1976, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
  • Kirchner, J.W., 2006. Getting the right answers for the right reasons: linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research, 42 (3), W03S04. doi: 10.1029/2005WR004362
  • Lyon, S. W., et al., 2004. Using a topographic index to distribute variable source area runoff predicted with the SCS curve-number equation. Hydrological Processes, 18 (15), 2757–2771. doi: 10.1002/hyp.1494
  • McFeeters, S.K., 1996. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17 (7), 1425–1432. doi: 10.1080/01431169608948714
  • Moriasi, D.N., et al., 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (3), 885–900. doi: 10.13031/2013.23153
  • Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  • Nie, W., et al., 2011. Assessing impacts of landuse and landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. Journal of Hydrology, 407 (1–4), 105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.012
  • Putty, M.R.Y., 2009. Curve-number-based watershed model incorporating quick subsurface runoff, with applications in the Western Ghats, South India. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14 (8), 876–881. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000057
  • Putty, M.R.Y. and Prasad, R., 2000. Understanding runoff processes using a watershed model – a case study in the Western Ghats in South India. Journal of Hydrology, 228 (3–4), 215–227. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00141-4
  • Rahman, K., et al., 2013. Streamflow modeling in a highly managed mountainous glacier watershed using SWAT: the Upper Rhone River watershed case in Switzerland. Water Resources Management, 27 (2), 323–339. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0188-9
  • Refsgaard, J.C. and Knudsen, J., 1996. Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 32 (7), 2189–2202. doi: 10.1029/96WR00896
  • Schneiderman, E.M., et al., 2007. Incorporating variable source area hydrology into a curve-number-based watershed model. Hydrological Processes, 21 (25), 3420–3430. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6556
  • Steenhuis, T., et al., 1995. SCS runoff equation revisited for variable-source runoff areas. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 121 (3), 234–238. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1995)121:3(234)
  • Steel, Robert G.D. and Torrie, James H., 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics, with special reference to biological sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 288–289.
  • Tripathi, M.P., Panda, R.K., and Raghuwanshi, N.S., 2003. Identification and prioritisation of critical sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using the SWAT model. Biosystems Engineering, 85 (3), 365–379. doi: 10.1016/S1537-5110(03)00066-7
  • USDA-SCS, 1972. National engineering handbook. Washington, DC: Soil Conservation Service, USDA.
  • Vandana, S. and Bandyopadhyay 1983. Eucalyptus – a disastrous tree for India. The Ecologist, 13, 184–187.
  • Van Griensven, A., et al., 2006. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology, 324 (1–4), 10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008
  • Venkatesh, B., et al., 2011. Analysis of observed soil moisture patterns under different land covers in Western Ghats, India. Journal of Hydrology, 397 (3–4), 281–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.006
  • Wagner, P.D., Kumar, S., and Schneider, K., 2013. An assessment of land use change impacts on the water resources of the Mula and Mutha Rivers catchment upstream of Pune, India. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 2233–2246. doi: 10.5194/hess-17-2233-2013
  • Western, A.W., Grayson, R.B., and Blöschl, G., 2002. Scaling of soil moisture: a hydrologic perspective. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 30 (1), 149–180. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.30.091201.140434
  • Wilson, E.H. and Sader, S.A., 2002. Detection of forest harvest type using multiple dates of Landsat TM imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80 (3), 385–396. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00318-2
  • Woodbury, J.D., et al., 2014. Application of SWAT with and without variable source area hydrology to a large watershed. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50 (1), 42–56. doi: 10.1111/jawr.12116
  • Xiao, X., et al., 2002. Quantitative relationships between field-measured leaf area index and vegetation index derived from vegetation images for paddy rice fields. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23 (18), 3595–3604. doi: 10.1080/01431160110115799
  • Xu, H., 2006. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27 (14), 3025–3033. doi: 10.1080/01431160600589179
  • Yapo, P.O., Gupta, H.V., and Sorooshian, S., 1996. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. Journal of Hydrology, 181 (1–4), 23–48. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.