Effects of depth-varying vegetation roughness in two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling

References

• Aberle, J. and Jarvela, J., 2013. Flow resistance of emergent rigid and flexible floodplains vegetation. Journal of Hydrodynamic Research, 51 (1), 33–45. doi: 10.1080/00221686.2012.754795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abood, M.M., et al., 2006. Manning roughness coefficient for grass-lined. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 13 (4), 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Aly, T.R., et al., 2014. Effects of LIDAR-derived, spatially distributed vegetation roughness on two-dimensional hydrodynamics in a gravel-cobble river at flows of 0.2 to 20 times bankfull. Geomorphology, 206, 468–482. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcement, G.J. and Schneider, V.R., 1989. Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and floodplains. USGS Water-Supply Paper, 2339 (1), 38.
   Google Scholar
• Arrault, A., et al., 2016. Hydrodynamics of long-duration urban floods: experiments and numerical modelling. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16, 1413–1429. doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-1413-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazin, P.H., 2013. Flows during floods in urban areas: influence of the detailed topography and the exchanges with the sewer system. Dissertation (PhD). Universite Claude Bernard – Lyon I.
   Google Scholar
• Bricker, J.D., et al., 2015. On the need for larger Manning’s roughness coefficients in depth-integrated tsunami inundation models. Coastal Engineering Journal, 57 (2), 1550005. doi: 10.1142/S0578563415500059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, A., et al., 2012. A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 426–427, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1959. Open channel hydrodynamics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cobby, D.M., Mason, D.C., and Davenport, I.J., 2001. Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modelling. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56, 121–138. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(01)00039-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, W.L., 1956. Estimating hydrodynamic roughness coefficients. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 37, 473–475.
   Google Scholar
• De Doncker, L., et al., 2009. Determination of the Manning roughness coefficient influenced by vegetation in the river Aa and Biebrza river. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 9(5), 549–567. doi: 10.1007/s10652-009-9149-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP), 2012. Natural assets for flood and cyclone resilience – synthesis of scientific evidence on the role of natural assets to reduce the human impacts of floods and cyclones. Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID), 2009. Master plan study for state of Melaka flood mitigation project. Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Fathi-Moghadam, M., 2006. Effects of land slope and flow depth on retarding flow in non-submerged vegetated lands. Journal of Agronomy, 5, 536–540. doi: 10.3923/ja.2006.536.540
   Google Scholar
• Fathi-Moghadam, M., et al., 2011. Determination of friction factor for rivers with non-submerged vegetation in banks and floodplains. Scientific Research and Essays, 6 (22), 4714–4719.
   Google Scholar
• Fischenich, J.C., 1997. Hydrodynamic impacts of riparian vegetation: summary of the literature. Technical report: EL-97-9. US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Flippin-Dudley, S.J., et al., 1998. Evaluation of flow-resistance equations for vegetated channels and floodplains. Technical Report EL-98-2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
   Google Scholar
• Forzieri G., Castelli F., and Preti F., 2012. Advances in remote sensing of hydraulic roughness. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33, 630–654. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2010.531788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzieri, G., et al. 2010. Riparian vegetation mapping for hydraulic roughness estimation using very high resolution remote sensing data fusion. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 136, 855–867. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzieri, G., et al., 2011a. Spectral-ALS data fusion for different roughness parameterizations of forested floodplains. River Research and Application, 27, 826–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forzieri, G., et al., 2011b. Satellite multispectral data for improved floodplains roughness modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 407, 41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, F.E., Rahmeyer, W.J., and Copeland, R.R., 2000. Determination of resistance due to shrubs and woody vegetation. Technical report, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
   Google Scholar
• Haradal, K. and Imamura, F., 2005. Effects of coastal forest on tsunami hazard mitigation: A preliminary approach investigation. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, 23, 279–292. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3331-1_17
   Google Scholar
• Hirabayashi, Y., et al., 2013. Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3, 816–821. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horritt, M.S. and Bates, P.D., 2001. Predicting floodplains inundation: raster-based modelling versus the finite element approach. Hydrological Processes, 15, 825–842. doi: 10.1002/hyp.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett, R.D., 1984. Hydraulics of high-gradient streams. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110, 1519–1539. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1984)110:11(1519)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, B. and Tommervik, H. 2014. The relationship between phytomass, NDVI and vegetation communities on Svalbard. Geoinformation, 27, 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Koshimura, S., et al., 2009. Developing fragility functions for tsunami damage estimation using numerical model and post-tsunami data from Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Coastal Engineering Journal, 51 (3), 243–273. doi: 10.1142/S0578563409002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheshwari, B. and McMahon, T., 1992 Modelling shallow overland flow in surface irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 118, 201–217. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:2(201)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, R., Schmidt, J., and Wheaton, J.M., 2012. Multiscalar model for the determination of spatially explicit riparian vegetation roughness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, D.C., et al., 2003. Floodplain friction parameterization in two-dimensional river food models using vegetation heights derived from airborne scanning laser altimetry. Hydrological Processes, 17, 1711–1732. doi: 10.1002/hyp.1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, S., Hagen, S.C., and Weishampel, J.F., 2012. Comparison of floodplains surface roughness parameters derived from land cover data and field measurements. Journal of Hydrology, 452–453, 139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hare, M.T., et al., 2010. Variability in roughness measurements for vegetated rivers near base flow in England and Scotland. Journal of Hydrology, 385, 361–370. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, H., et al., 2013. Evaluating scale and roughness effects in urban flood model using terrestrial LIDAR data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 4015–4030. doi: 10.5194/hess-17-4015-2013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petryk, S. and Bosmajian III, G., 1975. Analysis of flow through vegetation. Journal of Hydrodynamic Division ASCE, 101 (7), 871–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach, M.R., 1994. Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 71 (1), 211–216. doi: 10.1007/BF00709229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, R., Feyen, L., and Watkiss, P., 2013. Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1737–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, S.F. and Rahi, G.S., 1982. Seasonal variations of Manning’s roughness coefficient in subtropical marsh. Transactions of ASAE, 25 (1), 116–119. doi: 10.13031/2013.33488
   Google Scholar
• Soong, T.W. and Hoffman, M.J., 2002. Effects of riparian tree management on flood conveyance study of Manning’s roughness in vegetated floodplains with an application on the Embarras River in Illinois. Illinois State Water Survey Watershed Science Section, A Division of the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Champaign, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Stoesser, T., et al., 2003. Application of a 3D numerical model to a river with vegetated floodplains. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 5, 99–112. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Straatsma, M.W. and Baptist, M.J., 2008. Floodplain roughness parameterisation using airborne laser scanning and spectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing Environment, 112, 1062–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuy, N.B., et al., 2009. Effect of open gap in coastal forest on tsunami run-up: Investigations by experiment and numerical simulation. Ocean Engineering, 36, 1258–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, F., et al. 2016. Remote sensing of vegetation dynamics in drylands: Evaluating vegetation optical depth (VOD) using AVHRR NDVI and in site green biomass data over West African Sahel. Remote Sensing of Environment, 177, 265–276. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., Shen, H., and Chou, Y., 1999. Variation of roughness coefficients for unsubmerged and submerged vegetation. Journal of Hydrodynamic Engineering, 125 (9), 934–942. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1999)125:9(934)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahidi, I., Yusuf, B., and Cope, M., 2014. Vegetative roughness estimation for hydrodynamic modelling: a review. Journal of Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2 (1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zahidi, I., et al., 2015. Object-based classification of QuickBird image and low point density LIDAR for tropical trees and shrubs mapping. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 48, 423–446. doi: 10.5721/EuJRS20154824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., et al., 2009. Analysis and optimization of NDVI definitions and areal fraction models in remote sensing of vegetation. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20 (3), 721–751. doi: 10.1080/01431160802392620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar