2,651
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Understanding actor perspectives regarding challenges for integrated river basin management

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 229-242 | Received 11 Dec 2017, Accepted 15 Jul 2018, Published online: 09 Aug 2018

References

  • Billgren, C., and Holmén, H., 2008. Approaching reality: comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy, 25 (4), 550–562. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.004
  • Curtis, A., Shindler, B., and Wright, A., 2002. Sustaining local watershed initiatives: lessons from landcare and watershed councils. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (5), 1207–1216. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04342.x
  • Deltacommissaris, 2011. Deltaprogramma 2012. Werk aan de delta: Maatregelen van nu, voorbereiding voor morgen. Raport Deltacommissaris.
  • Dervin, B., 1998. Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2 (2), 36–46. doi: 10.1108/13673279810249369
  • Dervin, B., 1999. On studying information seeking methodologically: the implications of connecting metatheory to method. Information Processing & Management, 35 (6), 727–750. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00023-0
  • Dervin, B., 2003. Sense-making’s journey from metatheory to methodology to method: an example using information seeking and use as research focus. In: B. Dervin and L. Foreman-Wernet, eds. Sense-making methodology reader. Selected writings of Brenda Dervin. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 133–163.
  • Dervin, B., and Foreman-Wernet, L., 2012. Sense-making methodology as an approach to understanding and designing for campaign audiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dewulf, A., Meijerink, S., and Runhaar, H., 2015. The governance of adaptation to climate change as a multi-level, multi-sector and multi-actor challenge: a European comparative perspective. IWA.
  • Douglas, M., 1970. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology. London: Routledge.
  • Fliervoet, J.M., et al., 2013. Combining safety and nature: a multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 1033–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.023
  • Fliervoet, J.M., and Van den Born, R.J., 2017. From implementation towards maintenance: sustaining collaborative initiatives for integrated floodplain management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 33 (4), 570–590. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2016.1200962
  • Fliervoet, J.M., van den Born, R.J., and Meijerink, S.V., 2017. A stakeholder’s evaluation of collaborative processes for maintaining multi-functional floodplains: a Dutch case study. International Journal of River Basin Management, 15 (2), 175–186. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2017.1295384
  • Goffman, E, 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Gray, B, 2004. Strong opposition: frame-based resistance to collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14 (3), 166–176. doi: 10.1002/casp.773
  • Hartmann, T., 2011. Clumsy floodplains: responsive land policy for extreme floods. Surrey: Ashgate.
  • Hoekstra, A.Y., 1998. Perspectives on water: an integrated model-based exploration of the future. Utrecht: Jan van Arkel (International Books).
  • Keen, M., Brown, V.A., and Dyball, R, 2005. Social learning in environmental management: towards a sustainable future. New York, NY: Earthscan.
  • Klijn, F., et al., 2013. Design quality of room-for-the-river measures in the Netherlands: role and assessment of the quality team (Q-team). International Journal of River Basin Management, 11 (3), 287–299. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2013.811418
  • Koppenjan, J.F.M., and Klijn, E.-H., 2004. Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
  • Margerum, R.D., and Robinson, C.J, 2015. Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003
  • Michael, D.R., and Chen, S.L., 2006. Serious games: games that educate, train, and inform. Boston, MA: Thomson Course Technology.
  • Middelkoop, H., et al., 2004. Perspectives on flood management in the Rhine and Meuse rivers. River Research and Applications, 20 (3), 327–342. doi: 10.1002/rra.782
  • Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mitchell, B., 1990. Integrated water management: international experiences and perspectives. London: Belhaven Press.
  • Mitchell, B., 2005. Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environment and Planning A, 37 (8), 1335–1352. doi: 10.1068/a37224
  • Morrow, R.A., and Brown, D.D., 1994. Critical theory and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mostert, E., Craps, M., and Pahl-Wostl, C, 2008. Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water International, 33 (3), 293–304. doi: 10.1080/02508060802275757
  • Naumer, C., Fisher, K., and Dervin, B, 2008. Sense-making: a methodological perspective. Sensemaking Workshop, CHI’08.
  • Offermans, A., 2012. The perspectives method: towards socially robust river management. Maastricht: Maastricht University Press.
  • Pahl-Wostl, C., 2006. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and floodplains. Ecology and Society, 11 (1), Article no. 10. doi: 10.5751/ES-01542-110110
  • Pahl-Wostl, C., et al., 2007. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 21 (2), Article no. 5. doi: 10.5751/ES-05554-180233
  • Pahl-Wostl, C., et al., 2008. The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecological Economics, 64 (3), 484–495. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.007
  • Rijke, J., et al., 2012. Room for the river: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management, 10 (4), 369–382. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2012.739173
  • Rist, S., et al., 2006. ‘It was hard to come to mutual understanding … ’ – the multidimensionality of social learning processes concerned with sustainable natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 19 (3), 219–237. doi: 10.1007/s11213-006-9014-8
  • Romanello, S.J., 2003. Natural vs. social scientists’ perceptions of uncertainty in discussions of global climate change: a study using sense-making methodology. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
  • Sabatier, P.A., and Jenkins-Smith, H., 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition framework. Boulder: Westview.
  • Schwartz, B., 1991. A pluralistic model of culture. Contemporary Sociology, 20 (5), 764–766.
  • Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J, 2017. Metagoverning collaborative innovation in governance networks. The American Review of Public Administration, 47 (7), 826–839. doi: 10.1177/0275074016643181
  • Steg, L., and Sievers, I, 2000. Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environment and Behavior, 32 (2), 250–269. doi: 10.1177/00139160021972513
  • Susi, T., Johannesson, M., and Backlund, P, 2007. Serious games – an overview. Skövde: School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde.
  • Thompson, M, 1997. Rewriting the precepts of policy analysis. In: R. Ellis and M. Thompson, eds. Culture matters: essays in honor of Aaron Wildavsky. London: Routledge, 203–216.
  • Thompson, M., 2008. Organising and disorganising. A dynamic and non-linear theory of institutional emergence and its implication. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A., 1990. Cultural theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Valkering, P., et al., 2009. Modelling cultural and behavioural change in water management: an integrated, agent based, gaming approach. Integrated Assessment, 9 (1), 19–46.
  • Valkering, P., et al., 2011. Scenario analysis of perspective change to support climate adaptation: lessons from a pilot study on Dutch river management. Regional Environmental Change, 11 (2), 229–241. doi: 10.1007/s10113-010-0146-0
  • Valkering, P., et al., 2012. A perspective-based simulation game to explore future pathways of a water-society system under climate change. Simulation & Gaming, 44 (2-3), 366–390. doi: 10.1177/1046878112441693
  • Van Asselt, M., et al., 2001. Development of flood management strategies for the Rhine and Meuse basins in the context of integrated river management. Report of the IRMA-SPONGE project 3.
  • Van de Bilt, S., and Wiering, M, 2006. Natuur-en Waterbeheer in uiterwaarden. Een gelukkig huwelijk?
  • van Herk, S., et al., 2012. Governance of integrated flood risk management to deliver large scale investment programmes: delivery focused social learning in the Netherlands. In: Floodrisk 2012 – 2nd European conference on flood risk management. Rotterdam.
  • Verweij, M., et al., 2006. Clumsy solutions for a complex world: the case of climate change. Public Administration, 84 (4), 817–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09566.x-i1
  • Warner, J.F., van Buuren, A., and Edelenbos, J., 2013. Making space for the river. London: IWA.
  • Watson, N, 2004. Integrated river basin management: a case for collaboration. International Journal of River Basin Management, 2 (4), 243–257. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635235
  • West, J., Bailey, I., and Winter, M, 2010. Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach. Energy Policy, 38 (10), 5739–5748. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024
  • Wiering, M., and Arts, B, 2006. Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy? Hydrobiologia, 565 (1), 327–338. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-5923-2
  • Wolsink, M, 2006. River basin approach and integrated water management: governance pitfalls for the Dutch space-water-adjustment management principle. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 37 (4), 473–487.