344
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A synthetic unit hydrograph model based on fractal characteristics of watersheds

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 465-477 | Received 17 Mar 2017, Accepted 24 Jul 2018, Published online: 16 Aug 2018

References

  • Akshoy, H., 2000. Use of Gamma distribution in hydrological analysis. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Science, 24, 419–428.
  • Arsyad, S., 2000. Land and water conservation. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB). [In Indonesian.]
  • Bhunya, P.K., Misra, S.K., and Berndtsson, R., 2003, Simplified two-parameter Gamma distribution for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8 (4), 226–230. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:4(226)
  • Bhunya, P.K., Panda, S.N., and Goel, M.K., 2011. Synthetic unit hydrograph methods: a critical review. The Open Hydrology Journal, 5, 1–8. doi: 10.2174/1874378101105010001
  • Endalamaw, A., et al., 2017. Towards improved parameterization of a macroscale hydrologic model in a discontinuous permafrost boreal forest ecosystem. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 4663–4680. doi: 10.5194/hess-21-4663-2017
  • Fleurant, C., Kartiwa, B., and Roland, B., 2006. Analytical model for a geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph. Hydrological Processes, 20 (18), 3879–3895. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6162
  • Ghorbani, M.A., Kashani, M.H., and Zeynali, S., 2013, Development of synthetic unit hydrograph using probability model. Research in Civil and Environmental Engineering, 1, 54–66.
  • Gray, D.M., 1964. Synthetic hydrographs for small drainage areas. Proceeding of American Society of Civil Engineer, 87, 33–54.
  • Harto, S., 1985. GAMA I synthetic unit hydrograph. Jakarta: Publisher of Indonesian Public Work Ministry. [In Indonesian.]
  • Himanshu, S.K., et al., 2013. Remote sensing and GIS applications in determination of geomorphological parameters and design flood for a Himalayan River Basin, India. International Research Journal of Earth Sciences, 1 (3), 11–15.
  • Indonesian Geospatial Information Agency, 2013. Indonesian Topography Map, Jakarta. [In Indonesian.]
  • Irianto, G., 2003. Flood and drought: cause, anticipation and solution. Bogor: Universal Pustaka Media, 2003. [In Indonesian.]
  • Iturbe, I.R. and Valdes, J.B., 1979. The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response. Water Resources Research, 15, 1409–1420. doi: 10.1029/WR015i006p01409
  • Jain, V. and Sinha, R., 2003. Evaluation of geomorphic control on flood hazard through geomorphic instantaneous unit hydrograph. Current Science, 85 (11), 1596–1600.
  • Kottegoda, N.T. and Rosso, R., 2008. Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Kumar, R., et al., 2004. GIUH based Clark and Nash models for runoff estimation for an ungauged basin and their uncertainty analysis. International Journal of River Basin Management, 2 (4), 281–290. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635238
  • Kuok, K.K., et al., 2000. Evaluation of daily rainfall-runoff model using multilayer perceptron and particle swarm optimization feed forward neural networks. Journal of Environmental Hydrology, 18 (10), 1–16.
  • Nash, J.E., 1959. Synthetic determination of unit hydrograph parameters. Journal of Geophysical Research, 64 (1), 111–115. doi: 10.1029/JZ064i001p00111
  • Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V., 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models: part I. A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10 (3), 282–290. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  • Natakusumah, D.K., Hatmoko, W., and Harlan, D., 2011. General procedure calculation of synthetic unit hydrograph using ITB method and its application examples. Journal of Teknik Sipil, 18 (3), 251–291. [In Indonesian.]
  • Radhakrishnan, P., Lian, T.L., and Sagar, B.S.D, 2004. Estimation of fractal dimension through morphological decomposition, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 21, 563–572. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2003.12.085
  • Rao, K.H.V.D., et al., 2014. Transforming to hydrological modelling approach for long-term water resources assessment under climate change scenario-a case study of the Godavari basin, India. Current Science, 106 (2), 293–299.
  • Rosso, R. and Bacchi, B., 1991. Fractal relation of mainstream length to catchment area in river networks. Water Resources Research, 27 (3), 381–387. doi: 10.1029/90WR02404
  • Singh, S.K., 2000. Transmuting synthetic unit hydrographs into Gamma distribution. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5 (4), 380–385. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2000)5:4(380)
  • Singh, P.K., Mishra, S.K., and Jain, M.K., 2014. A review of the synthetic unit hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (2), 239–261. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2013.870664
  • Snyder, F.F., 1938. Synthetic unit hydrographs. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 19 (1), 447–454. doi: 10.1029/TR019i001p00447
  • Soemarto, C.D., 1985. Engineering hydrology. Jakarta: Erlangga. [In Indonesian.]
  • Soil Conservation Service, 1972. SCS national engineering handbook, section 4. Washington: Hydrology, Soil Conservation Service, US.
  • Subramanya, K., 2000. Engineering hydrology. 2nd ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.
  • Sumarjo, G.I., Duchesne, J., and Perez, P., 1999. H2U: a transfer functional model using fractal characteristics of the hydrographic network. In Proceedings of international congress on modelling and simulation, Australia, 478–482.
  • Swain, J.B., Jha, R., and Patra, K.C., 2015. Stream flow prediction in a typical ungauged catchment using GIUH approach. In Aquatic procedia – international conference on water resources, coastal and ocean engineering, vol. 4, 993–1000.
  • Triatmodjo, B., 2002. Numerical methods. Yogyakarta: Beta Offset. [In Indonesian.]
  • Tunas, I.G., Anwar, N., and Lasminto, U., 2016. Fractal characteristic analysis of watershed as variable of synthetic unit hydrograph model. The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 10, 706–718. doi: 10.2174/1874149501610010706
  • Wang, Y. and Tung, Y.K., 2006. Stochastic generation of geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph-based flow hydrograph. International Journal of River Basin Management, 4 (1), 49–56. doi: 10.1080/15715124.2006.9635275

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.