Is collaborative management always possible? The case of Sauce Grande River Basin, Argentina

References

• Abers, R.N., 2007. Organizing for governance: building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World Development, 35 (8), 1450–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. and Ostrom, E., 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29 (4), 485–514. doi: 10.1177/0032329201029004002
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar Umaña, I., 2007. Más vale prevenir que lamentar: Las cuencas y la gestión del riesgo a los desastres naturales en Guatemala. Guatemala: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Ananda, J. and Proctor, W., 2013. Collaborative approaches to water management and planning: an institutional perspective. Ecological Economics, 86, 97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.018
   Google Scholar
• Arcade, J., et al., 1999. Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & actor’s strategy with MACTOR method. Futures Research Methodology, American Council for the United Nations University: The Millennium Project.
   Google Scholar
• Avis, W.R., 2015. Engaging SH in areas of cross-border infrastructure investment. Birmingham: GSDRC, University of Birmingham, (GSDRC Helpdesk Research Report 1277).
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, A., et al., 2017. Making the transition to co-management governance arrangements in Hawai‘i: a framework for understanding transaction and transformation costs. International Journal of the Commons, 11 (1), 388. doi:10.18352/ijc.709.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, V., et al., 2000. Influence of the South Atlantic convergence zone and South Atlantic Sea surface temperature on Interannual summer rainfall variability in southeastern South America. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 67, 123–133. doi: 10.1007/s007040070002
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., et al., 2013. Collaborative environmental governance: are watershed partnerships swimming or are they sinking? Land Use Policy, 30 (1), 748–757. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.016
   Google Scholar
• Blackstock, K., et al., 2015. Participatory research to influence participatory governance: managing relationships with planners. Area, 47 (3), 254–260. doi: 10.1111/area.12129
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, V.Y., Piccolo, M.C., and Perillo, G.M.E., 2011. Análisis de los períodos secos y húmedos en el sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Revista de Climatología, 11, 31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Borisova, T., Racevskis, L., and Kipp, J., 2012. Stakeholder analysis of a collaborative watershed management process: a Florida case study. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48 (2), 277–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00615.x
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J.M., 2004. What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review, 6 (1), 21–53. doi: 10.1080/14719030410001675722
   Google Scholar
• Calheiros, D.F., Seidl, A.F., and Ferreira, C.J., 2000. Participatory research methods in environmental science: local and scientific knowledge of a limnological phenomenon in the Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37 (4), 684–696. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00524.x
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M.E., Scian, B., and Piccolo, M.C., 2008. Agricultural drought in the Claromecó river basin, Buenos Aires province, Argentina. Revista de Climatología, 8, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. and Berkes, F, 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. and Sandström, A., 2008. Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2, 33–54. doi: 10.18352/ijc.20
   Google Scholar
• Casado, A.L., 2013. Human impacts and fluvial metamorphosis. The effects of flow regulation on the hydrology, morphology and water temperature of the Sauce Grande River, Argentina. Thesis (PhD). Universidad Nacional del Sur - Universite Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand, 358.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K., et al., 2007. A systemic approach to managing multiple perspectives and stakeholding in water catchments: some findings from three UK case studies. Environmental Science and Policy, 10 (6), 564–574. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.12.005
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Arnold, G., and Tomás, S.V., 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 38. doi: 10.5751/ES-03704-150438
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., et al., 2011. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in southern Ecuador. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (1), 50–75. doi: 10.1177/0020852310390108
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, A., 2015. Efficient and resilient governance of social–ecological systems. Ambio, 44 (5), 343–352. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0607-7
   Google Scholar
• Fabinyi, M., Evans, L., and Foale, S.J., 2014. Social-ecological systems, social diversity, and power: insights from anthropology and political ecology. Ecology and Society, 19 (4). Available from: http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07029-190428.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) & European Observatory of Mountain Forests, 2006. The new generation of watershed management programmes and projects: a resource book for practitioners and local decision-makers based on the findings of an FAO review. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Fornerón, C.F., 2013. Hidrografía de la laguna Sauce Grande (provincia de Buenos Aires) en época de sequía. Thesis (PhD). Universidad Nacional del Sur, 216.
   Google Scholar
• Geilfus, F., 2002. 80 herramientas para el desarrollo participativo. Diagnóstico, Planificación, Monitoreo y Evaluación. San José, CR: IICA.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, V., 2010. Hidrogeomorfología de la cuenca alta del río Sauce Grande aplicada al peligro de crecida. Thesis (PhD). Universidad Nacional del Sur, 269.
   Google Scholar
• Heltberg, R., 2002. Property rights and natural resource management in developing countries. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16 (2), 189–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00164
   Google Scholar
• IDEAM, 2013. Guía técnica para la formulación de los planes de ordenación y manejo de cuencas hidrográficas. Bogotá, DC: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible.
   Google Scholar
• IFC, 2014. A strategic approach to early stakeholder engagement: a good practice handbook for junior companies in the extractive industries. Washington, DC: IFC. Available from: https://commdev.org/userfiles/FINAL_IFC_131208_ESSE%20Handbook_web%201013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M.T., 2001. Collaboration as an implementation strategy: an assessment of six watershed management programs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M.T, 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy: lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37, 281–320. doi: 10.1177/0095399705276111
   Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia, I., et al., 2015. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: insights for environmental policies. Ambio, 44 (4), 285–296. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0556-1
   Google Scholar
• Isla, F.I., Cortizo, L., and Orellano Turno, H., 2001. Dinámica y Evolución de las Barreras Medanosas, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista Brasileira de Geomorfología, 2 (1), 73–83. doi: 10.20502/rbg.v2i1.9
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., et al., 2016. Linking knowledge with action in the pursuit of sustainable water-resources management. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113 (17), 4591–4596. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813125107
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N., et al., 2001. User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy, 3 (6), 507–520. doi: 10.1016/S1366-7017(02)00014-4
   Google Scholar
• Kemerer, C.F. and Slaughter, S., 1997. Methodologies for performing empirical studies: report from the international workshop on empirical studies of software maintenance. Empirical Software Engineering, 2 (2), 109–118. doi: 10.1023/A:1009741031615
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T.M. and Thomas, C.W., 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66 (S1), 111–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Google Scholar
• Lawry, S., et al., 2017. The impact of land property rights interventions on investment and agricultural productivity in developing countries: a systematic review. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 9 (1), 61–81. doi: 10.1080/19439342.2016.1160947
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., and Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21 (4), 645–670. doi: 10.1002/pam.10079
   Google Scholar
• London, S., et al., 2012. Stakeholder vision on social- ecological-system situation in Argentina case study. First deliverable of the community-based management of environmental challenges in Latin America (COMET – LA) Project. 7° Programa Marco de la Comisión Europea. Available from: http://www.comet-la.net/sites/default/files/DELIVERABLE%20ARGENTINA%20FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Robins, G., and Wang, P., 2014. Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and Society, 19 (4), 341–361. doi: 10.5751/ES-06880-190423
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. and Paulsen, K., 2011. Governance capacity in collaborative watershed partnerships: evidence from the Philadelphia region. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54 (10), 1293–1313. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.572694
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R.D. and Robinson, C.J., 2015. Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Mavrommati, G., Baustian, M.M., and Dreelin, E.A., 2014. Coupling socioeconomic and lake systems for sustainability: a conceptual analysis using Lake St. Clair region as a case study. Ambio, 43 (3), 275–287. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0432-4
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J.A., 1996. Qualitative research design. An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K.V., and Gulati, A., 2002. What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Development, 30 (4), 649–666. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00130-9
   Google Scholar
• Montico, S., 2002. Manejo integrado de Cuencas Hidrográficas Rurales: Base para el ordenamiento territorial. Revista Agromensajes de la Facultad, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias Universidad Nacional de Rosario, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Mutekanga, F.P., et al., 2013. The use of stakeholder analysis in integrated watershed management: experiences from the Ngenge Watershed, Uganda. Mountain Research and Development, 33 (2), 122–131. doi: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00031.1
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2015. Due diligence guidance for meaningful stakeholder engagement in the extractives sector. Paris: OECD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/OECD-Guidance-ExtractivesSector-Stakeholder-Engagement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ogada, J.O., et al., 2017. Managing resources through stakeholder networks: collaborative water governance for Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya. Water International, 42 (3), 271–290. doi: 10.1080/02508060.2017.1292076
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peat, M., et al., 2017. Creating institutional flexibility for adaptive water management: insights from two management agencies. Journal of Environmental Management, 202 (1), 188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.059
   Google Scholar
• Peñalba, O.C. and Vargas, W.M., 2004. Interdecadal and Interannual variations of annual and extreme precipitation over central-northeastern Argentina. International Journal of Climatology, 24, 1565–1580. doi: 10.1002/joc.1069
   Google Scholar
• Prokopy, L.S., et al., 2014. A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 27 (11), 1177–1191. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2014.918230
   Google Scholar
• Provincia de Buenos Aires, 1999. Ley Provincial 12257/99 – Código de Aguas. Available from: http://www.gob.gba.gov.ar/dijl/.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10), 2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M.S., et al., 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1933–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C.J., et al., 2011. Policy-level collaboratives for environmental management at the regional scale: lessons and challenges from Australia and the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 24 (8), 849–859. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2010.487848
   Google Scholar
• Scarlett, L. and Mc Kinney, M., 2016. Connecting people and places: the emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14 (3), 116–125. doi: 10.1002/fee.1247
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E., 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68 (3), 249–262. doi: 10.2307/3146375
   Google Scholar
• Scian, B., 2002. Variabilidad de las condiciones hídricas en la región semiárida pampeana Argentina. Geoacta, 27, 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sneddon, C. and Fox, C., 2007. Power, development, and institutional change: participatory governance in the lower Mekong basin. World Development, 35 (12), 2161–2181. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, P. and Jiggins, J., 2007. Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 10 (6), 575–586. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.011
   Google Scholar
• Talley, J. L., Schneider, J., and Lindquist, E., 2016. A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: the five-feature framework. Ecology and Society, 21 (4), 38. doi: 10.5751/ES-08830-210438
   Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme), 2014. Towards integrated water resources management. International experience in development of river basin organizations. United Nations environment programme. Sudan, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Voinov, A. and Gaddis, E.J.B., 2008. Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: a perspective from modeling practitioners. Ecological Modelling, 216 (2), 197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Von Korff, Y., et al., 2012. Implementing participatory water management: recent advances in theory, practice, and evaluation. Ecology and Society, 17 (1). Available from: http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04733-170130.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J.M. and Yaffee, S., 2000. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zapperi, P., et al., 2006. Caracterización de las precipitaciones invernales en el Suroeste bonaerense. In: N. Cazzaniga and M. Vaquero, eds. Ambiente natural, campo y ciudad: Estrategias de uso y conservación en el Sudoeste Bonaerense. Bahía Blanca: Ediciones UNS, 63–68.
   Google Scholar