Benchmarking the Indian National CartoDEM against SRTM for 1D hydraulic modelling

References

• Arcement, G.J. and Schneider, V.R., 1989. Guide for selecting Manning's roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. Available from: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/wsp2339.
   Google Scholar
• Barbarella, M., Fiani, M., and Zollo, C, 2017. Assessment of DEM derived from very high-resolution stereo satellite imagery for geomorphometric analysis. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 50 (1), 534–549. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1372084.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, P.D., et al., 2006. Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: data analysis and modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 328 (1–2), 306–318. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169406000047 [Accessed 19 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bhuyian, M., Kalyanapu, A., and Hossain, F, 2017. Evaluating conveyance-based DEM correction technique on NED and SRTM DEMs for flood impact assessment of the 2010 Cumberland river flood. Geosciences, 7 (4), 132.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S.A, 2016. Modeling and visualizing uncertainties of flood boundary delineation: algorithm for slope and DEM resolution dependencies of 1D hydraulic models. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 30 (6), 1677–1690.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, T., and Lindenschmidt, K.E, 2017. Comparison and validation of digital elevation models derived from InSAR for a Flat Inland Delta in the high latitudes of Northern Canada. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 43 (2), 109–123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2017.1286936.
   Google Scholar
• CRED & UNISDR, 2015. The human costs of weather related disasters.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, D., et al., 2018. Enhancing digital elevation models for hydraulic modelling using flood frequency detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 217 (October 2017), 506–522. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.029.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, S., 2016. Role of River Bathymetry in hydraulic modeling of river channels [Online]. Available from: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_theses/940.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M.M., 2006. Spatial analysis in geography. In: Spatial analysis and geocomputation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 17–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35730-0%7B_%7D2.
   Google Scholar
• García-Pintado, J., et al., 2015. Satellite-supported flood forecasting in river networks: A real case study. Journal of Hydrology, 523, 706–724. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169415001031.
   Google Scholar
• Garey, A.L., and Smock, L.A, 2015. Advances in watershed science and assessment. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, 33, 111–140. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-14212-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gichamo, T.Z., et al., 2012. River cross-section extraction from the ASTER global DEM for flood modeling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 31, 37–46. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., et al., 2016. Remote sensing-derived water extent and level to constrain hydraulic flood forecasting models: opportunities and challenges. Surveys in Geophysics, 37 (5), 977–1034. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10712-016-9378-y.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S. et al., 2018. Effective representation of river geometry in hydraulic flood forecast models. Water Resources Research. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2017WR021765.
   Google Scholar
• Han, B., and Endreny, T.A, 2014. River surface water topography mapping at sub-millimeter resolution and precision with close range photogrammetry: Laboratory scale application. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 7 (2), 602–608.
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi-Beni, L., et al., 2018. Challenges and opportunities for UAV-based digital elevation model generation for flood-risk management: a case of Princeville, North Carolina. Sensors, 18(11), 3843–3856.
   Google Scholar
• Hawker, L., et al., 2018. Perspectives on digital elevation model (DEM) simulation for flood modeling in the absence of a high-accuracy Open Access global DEM. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6 (December), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jarihani, A.A., et al., 2015. Satellite-derived digital elevation model (DEM) selection, preparation and correction for hydrodynamic modelling in large, low-gradient and data-sparse catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 524, 489–506. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.02.049.
   Google Scholar
• Jena, P.P., Panigrahi, B., and Chatterjee, C, 2016. Assessment of Cartosat-1 DEM for modeling floods in data scarce regions. Water Resources Management, 30 (3), 1293–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, Y, 2017. Nationwide flood Monitoring for Disaster Risk Reduction using Multiple satellite data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (7), 203. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/6/7/203.
   Google Scholar
• Laks, I., et al., 2017. Possibilities of using low quality digital elevation models of floodplains in hydraulic numerical models. Water (Switzerland), 9 (4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Md Ali, A., Solomatine, D.P., and Di Baldassarre, G., 2015. Assessing the impact of different sources of topographic data on 1-D hydraulic modelling of floods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (1), 631–643.
   Google Scholar
• Mersel, M.K., et al., 2013. Estimation of river depth from remotely sensed hydraulic relationships. Water Resources Research, 49 (6), 3165–3179. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/wrcr.20176 [Accessed 29 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Merwade, V., Cook, A., and Coonrod, J, 2008. GIS techniques for creating river terrain models for hydrodynamic modeling and flood inundation mapping. Environmental Modelling {&} Software, 23 (10–11), 1300–1311. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364815208000455 [Accessed 15 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S.S., et al., 2013. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source digital elevation model (DEM). International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 21, 205–217. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2012.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Muralikrishnan, S., et al., 2011. Evaluation of Indian National DEM from Cartosat-1 Data.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J., Schumann, G., and Bates, P., 2012. A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas. Water Resources Research, 48 (11). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012514.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, J.C., et al., 2015. Efficient incorporation of channel cross-section geometry uncertainty into regional and global scale flood inundation models. Journal of Hydrology, 529 (AUGUST), 169–183. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022169415005235.
   Google Scholar
• NRSC, 2011. Evaluation of Indian National DEM from Cartosat-1 data. Indian Space Research-NRSC, 1 (September 2011), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Patro, S., et al., 2009a. Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and Remote sensing data. Journal Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37 (March), 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Patro, S., et al., 2009b. Hydrodynamic modelling of a large flood-prone river system in India with limited data. Hydrological Processes, 23 (July), 2774–2791.
   Google Scholar
• Pilotti, M, 2015. Extraction of cross sections from digital elevation model for one-dimensional dam-break wave propagation in mountain valleys. Water Resources Research, 52 (1), 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pipitone, C., et al., 2018. Monitoring water surface and level of a reservoir using different remote sensing approaches and comparison with dam displacements evaluated via GNSS. Remote Sensing, 10 (1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pramanik, N., Panda, R.K., and Sen, D., 2010. One dimensional hydrodynamic modeling of river flow using DEM extracted river cross-sections. Water Resources Management, 24 (5), 835–852.
   Google Scholar
• Radhika, V.N., et al., 2007. Robust stereo image matching for spaceborne imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45 (9), 2993–3000.
   Google Scholar
• Rudorff, C.M., Melack, J.M., and Bates, P.D, 2014. Flooding dynamics on the lower Amazon floodplain: 1. Hydraulic controls on water elevation, inundation extent, and river-floodplain discharge. Water Resources Research, 50 (1), 619–634.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, B.F, 2007. Evaluation of on-line DEMs for flood inundation modeling. Advances in Water Resources, 30 (8), 1831–1843. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0309170807000279 [Accessed 11 August, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G., et al., 2018. Assisting flood Disaster Response with Earth Observation data and products: a critical assessment. Remote Sensing, 10 (8), 1230. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/8/1230.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J., et al., 2013. A first large-scale flood inundation forecasting model. Water Resources Research, 49 (September), 6248–6257.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.-P., et al., 2014. Technology: Fight floods on a global scale. Nature, 507 (7491), 169–169.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.-P, and Andreadis, K.M, 2016. A method to assess localized impact of better floodplain topography on flood risk prediction. Advances in Meteorology, 2016, Article ID 6408319, 8 pages. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6408319.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.P., Andreadis, K.M., and Bates, P.D, 2014. Downscaling coarse grid hydrodynamic model simulations over large domains. Journal of Hydrology, 508, 289–298. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.051.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.-P., and Bates, P.D, 2018. The need for a high-accuracy. Open-Access Global DEM. Frontiers in Earth Science, 6 (December), 225. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2018.00225/full.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann, G.J.P., and Domeneghetti, A, 2016. Exploiting the proliferation of current and future satellite observations of rivers. Hydrological Processes, 30 (16), 2891–2896.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., et al., 2016. Calibration of channel depth and friction parameters in the LISFLOOD-FP hydraulic model using medium-resolution SAR data and identifiability techniques. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20 (12), 4983–4997.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, K., et al., 2015. A review of low-cost space-borne data for flood modelling: topography, flood extent and water level. Hydrological Processes, (March), 3387. p.n/a-n/a. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hyp.10449.
   Google Scholar