A new water quality index elaborated under the brazilian legislation perspective

References

• Abrahão, R., Carvalho, M., Silva Júnior, W. R., Machado, T. T. V., Gadelha, C. L. M., & Hernandez, M. V. M. (2007). Use of index analysis to evaluate the water quality of a stream receiving industrial effluents. Water SA, 33(4), 459–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Sanitária e Ambiental (ABES). (2016). Situação do Saneamento básico no Brasil: uma análise com base na PNAD 2015 (Brazilian Association of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, 2016. Situation of Basic Sanitation in Brazil: An analysis based on the PNAD 2015), Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. Proceedings of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160, 268–282.
   Google Scholar
• Bascaran, M. (1979). Establishment of a methodology for the determination or water quality. Boletin Informativo del Medio Ambient, 9, 30–51. MOPU, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava, D. S. (1985). Expression for drinking water supply standards. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 3(3).
   Google Scholar
• Borja, P. C. (2014). Política pública de saneamento básico: uma análise da recente experiência brasileira. Saúde Soc. São Paulo, 23(2), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000200007
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. M., Mcclelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A., & Tozer, R. G. (1970). A water quality index—Do We Dare? Water Sewage Works, 117, 339–343.
   Google Scholar
• Camargo, A. P., & Sentelhas, P. C. (1997). Avaliação do desempenho de diferentes métodos de estimativa da evapotranspiração potencial no estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia, 5(1), 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian eater quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life (CCME). (2001). CCME water quality index 1.0, User’s Manual, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo (CETESB). (2006). Relatório de Qualidade de Águas Interiores do Estado de São Paulo 2006 (ENVIRONMENTAL COMPANY OF The State of São Paulo. Report on the Quality of Inland Waters of the State of São Paulo). São Paulo: CETESB, 2007. 327p.
   Google Scholar
• Conesa, V. V. F. (2000). Guia metodologica para la evaluación del impacto ambiental (Methodological guide for environmental impact assessment) (3rd ed. rev. aum). Mundi-Prensa. 412p.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho Estadual de Recursos Hídricos (CERH). (2006). Resolução n° 49, de 20 de dezembro de 2006. Dispõe sobre a instituição de Regiões Hidrográficas, Bacias Hidrográficas e Unidades Hidrográficas de Gerenciamento de Recursos Hídricos do Estado do Paraná. Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos (State Council of Water Resources. Resolution No. 49 of December 20, 2006. Provides for the establishment of Hydrographic Regions, Hydrographic Basins and Hydrographic Units of Water Resources Management of the State of Parana. Secretary of State for the Environment and Water Resources), Parana, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (CONAMA). (2005). Resolução n° 357, 2005. Dispõe sobre a classificação dos corpos de água e diretrizes ambientais para o seu enquadramento. Ministério do Meio Ambiente (National Council for the Environment. Ministry of the Environment. Resolution no. 357, 2005. Provides for the classification of water bodies and environmental guidelines for their classification). Ministry of the Environment, Brasilia, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cude, C. G. (2001). Oregon water quality index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb05480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debels, P., Figueroa, R., Urrutia, R., Barra, R., & Niell, X. (2005). Evaluation of water quality in the Chillán river (Central Chile) using physicochemical parameters and a modified water quality index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 110(1–3), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-8064-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, O. T., Telci, I. T., & Aral, M. M. (2013). The use of water quality index models for the evaluation of surface water quality: a case study for Kirmir Basin, Ankara, Turkey. Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 5(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-013-0085-3
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, S., & Qiu, Z. (2016). Understanding the relationship of land uses and water quality in Twenty First Century: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 173, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leoneti, A. B., do Prado, E. L., & de Oliveira, S. V. W. B. (2011). Saneamento básico no Brasil: considerações sobre investimentos e sustentabilidade para o século XXI. Revista de Administração Pública, 45(2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122011000200003
   Google Scholar
• Lumb, A., Sharma, T. C., & Bibeault, J. F. (2011). A review of genesis and evolution of water quality index (WQI) and some future directions. Water Quality Exposure and Health, 3(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-011-0040-0
   Google Scholar
• Misaghi, F., Delgosha, F., Razzaghmanesh, M., & Myers, B. (2017). Introducing a qater quality index for assessing water for irrigation purposes: A case study of the Ghezel River. Science of the Total Environment, 589, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesce, S. F., & Wunderlin, D. A. (2000). Use of water quality índices to verify the impact or Córdoba city (Argentina) on Suquía river. Water Research, 34(11), 2915–2926. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poonan, T., Tanushree, B., & Sukalyan, C. (2013). Water quality indices – important tools for water quality assessment: A review. International Journal of Advances in Chemistry, 1(1), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Posselt, E. L., & Costa, A. B. (2010). Software IQAData. INPI record n° 10670-2, Programa de Mestrado em Sistemas e Processos Industriais (Master's Program in Industrial Systems and Processes) PPGSPI, UNISC, 2010. http://www.unisc.br/ppgspi.
   Google Scholar
• Sargaonkar, A., & Deshpande, V. (2003). Development of an overall index of pollution for surface water based on a general classification scheme in Indian context. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 89(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025886025137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutadian, A. D., Muttil, N., Yilmaz, A. G., & Perera, B. C. J. (2016). Development of river water quality indices – a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 188(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-5050-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi, S., Sharma, B., Singh, P., & Dobhal, R. (2013). Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. American Journal of Water Resources, 1(3), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajwr-1-3-3
   Google Scholar
• Vorosmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., & Lammers, R. B. (2000). Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science, 289(5477), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmott, C. J. (1981). On the validations of models. Physical Geography, 2(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213
   Google Scholar