Improved assessment of maximum streamflow for risk management of hydraulic infrastructures. A case study

References

• Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49(268), 765–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA. (2016). Plano de gestão dos riscos de inundações, região hidrográfica RH3 – Douro. Zonas Críticas: Régua, Porto/Vila Nova de Gaia e Chaves. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente, I.P. Departamento de Recursos Hídricos, PGRI.
   Google Scholar
• APA. (2019). Avaliação preliminar de risco de inundações, região hidrográfica RH3 – Douro. Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente, I.P. Departamento de Recursos Hídricos, PGRI.
   Google Scholar
• Apipattanavis, S., Rajagopalan, B., & Lall, U. (2005). Local polynomial technique for flood frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology. http://civil.colorado.edu/∼balajir/my-papers/LocalPoly-finalversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benkaci, T. (2019). FFD 2.0. Retrieved 2019-11-06.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information. Theoretic approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Calver, A., Stewart, E., & Goodsell, G. (2009). Comparative analysis of statistical and catchment modelling approaches to river flood frequency estimation. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01018.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, F. N. (1983). Métodos de análise e determinação de caudais de cheia. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Filliben, J. J. (1975). The probability plot correlation coefficient test for normality. Technometrics, 17(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1975.10489279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Earth. (n.d.). Google Earth. Retrieved 2019-12-06.
   Google Scholar
• Hipólito, J. R., & Vaz, A. (2011). Hidrologia e recursos hídricos. Editora universitária do Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. (1975). Rank correlation methods. Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, J. F., & Keeping, E. S. (1957). Mathematics of statistics. Vol. 2. Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Khedun, C. P., Singh, V. P., & Byrd, A. R. (2019). Joint probability of extreme streamflow and its day of occurrence. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24(8), 06019005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, G. (2019). Frequency and risk analyses in hydrology. Water Resources Publications, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoyiannis, D. (2004). Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: I. Theoretical investigation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 49, 4. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.49.4.575.54430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusumastuti, D. I., Struthers, I., Sivapalan, M., & Reynolds, D. A. (2007). Threshold effects in catchment storm response and the occurrence and magnitude of flood events: Implications for flood frequency. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(4), 1515–1528. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1515-2007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, U., Moon, Y.-i., & Bosworth, K. (1993). Kernel flood frequency estimators: Bandwidth selection and kernel choice. Water Resources Research, 29(4), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR02466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lencastre, A. C., Franco, F. M., & Antunes, M. T. (1984). Lições de hidrologia. Editora universitária da Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, H. B. (1945). Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 13, 245–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177730491
   Google Scholar
• Massey, F. J., Jr. (1951). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46(253), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghettini, M., & Pinto, É. J. d. A. (2007). Hidrologia estatística. CPRM.
   Google Scholar
• Okoli, K., Breinl, K., Brandimarte, L., Botto, A., Volpi, E., & Baldassarre, G. D. (2018). Model averaging versus model selection: Estimating design floods with uncertain river flow data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63(13-14), 1913–1926. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1546389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoli, K., Mazzoleni, M., Breinl, K., & Baldassarre, G. D. (2019). A systematic comparison of statistical and hydrological methods for design flood estimation. Hydrology Research, 50(6), 1665–1678. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela, M. M., & da Silva, C. d. S. R. (2014). Da regionalização de informação hidrométrica ao dimensionamento de albufeiras de regularização e a análise de incertezas.
   Google Scholar
• Quintela, A. (1996). Hidrologia e recursos hídricos. Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Rizwan, M., Guo, S., Xiong, F., & Yin, J. (2018). Evaluation of various probability distributions for deriving design flood featuring right-tail events in Pakistan. Water, 10(11), 1603. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. S., Sivapalan, M., & Snell, J. D. (1995). On the relative roles of hillslope processes, channel routing, and network geomorphology in the hydrologic response of natural catchments. Water Resources Research, 31(12), 3089–3101. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR01948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogger, M., Kohl, B., Pirkl, H., Viglione, A., Komma, J., Kirnbauer, R., Merz, R., & Blöschl, G. (2012). Runoff models and flood frequency statistics for design flood estimation in Austria – do they tell a consistent story? Journal of Hydrology, 456-457, 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, J., & Oliveira, M. (2002). As cheias na parte portuguesa da bacia hidrográfica do rio douro. Atas do 3° Congresso ibérico de gestão e planeamento da água, Fundação Nova Cultura da Água, Sevilha, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Vol. 26. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonović, S. P. (2012). Floods in a changing climate: Risk management. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sordo-Ward, Á, Bianucci, P., Garrote, L., & Granados, A. (2014). How safe is hydrologic infrastructure design? Analysis of factors affecting extreme flood estimation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 19(12), 04014028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallaksen, L. M., & Van Lanen, H. A. (2004). Hydrological drought: Processes and estimation methods for streamflow and groundwater. Vol. 48. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Tato, J. F. (1966). As cheias do rio Douro. Documentos e memórias para a história do Porto.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, A., & Costa, F. d. S. (2017). As inundações do rio Douro em 1909: um contributo para o seu estudo a partir dos arquivos históricos da Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente. Investigaciones Geográficas, 53(53), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-5370.2017.43598
   Google Scholar
• Wald, A., & Wolfowitz, J. (1943). An exact test for randomness in the non-parametric case based on serial correlation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 14(4), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731358
   Google Scholar