Rainfall nowcasting: predictability of short-term extremes in Sweden

References

• Agersten, S., 2012. Meteorological co-operation on operational NWP (MetCoOp), SMHI and met. no. In: Proceedings of the 12th EMS Annual Meeting & 9th European Conference on Applied Climatology (ECAC), 10–14 September 2012, Łódź, Poland. Available from: http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EMS2012/EMS2012-393.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., Salamon, P., Pappenberger, F., Wetterhall, F., and Thielen, J., 2012. Operational early warning systems for water-related hazards in Europe. Environmental Science Policy, 21, 35–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, P., Moseley, C., and Haerter, J.O., 2013. Strong increase in convective precipitation in response to higher temperatures. Nature Geoscience, 6, 181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, N.E., Pierce, C.E., and Seed, A.W., 2006. STEPS: a probabilistic precipitation forecasting scheme which merges an extrapolation nowcast with downscaled NWP. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 132, 2127–2155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curriero, F.C., Patz, J.A., Rose, J.B., and Lele, S., 2001. The association between extreme precipitation and waterborne disease outbreaks in the United States, 1948–1994. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1194–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, B., 2010. Rainfall intensity – a cloud physical reflection. Svenskt Vatten Utveckling Report nr. 2010–05Stockholm, Sweden: Svenskt Vatten [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Dai, A., 2001. Global precipitation and thunderstorm frequencies. Part I: Seasonal and interannual variations. Journal of Climatology, 14, 1092–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., Brown, B., and Bullock, R., 2006. Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas. Monthly Weather Review, 134, 1772–1784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, E. and McBride, J.L., 2000. Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors. Journal of Hydrology, 239, 179–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaume, E., Bain, V., Bernardaza, P., Newinger, O., Barbuc, M., Bateman, A., Blaškovicová, L., Blöschl, G., Borga, M., Dumitrescu, A., Daliakopoulos, I., Garcia, J., Irimescu, A., Kohnova, S., Koutroulis, A., Marchi, L., Matreata, S., Medina, V., Preciso, E., Sempere-Torres, D., Stancalie, G., Szolgay, J., Tsanis, J., Velasco, D., and Viglione, A., 2009. A compilation of data on European flash floods. Journal of Hydrology, 367, 70–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, U. and Zawadzki, I., 2002. Scale-dependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part I: description of the methodology. Monthly Weather Review, 130, 2859–2873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, B.W., 1998. Nimrod: a system for generating automated very short range forecasts. Meteorological Applications, 5, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, N., Berre, L., Hörnquist, S., Huang, X.-Y., Lindskog, M., Navascués, B., Mogensen, K.S., and Thorsteinsson, S., 2001. Three-dimensional variational data assimilation for a limited area model. Part I: general formulation and the background error constraint. Tellus A, 53, 425–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hernebring, C., 2006. Design storms in Sweden then and now. VA-forsk publ. 2006–04Stockholm, Sweden: Svenskt Vatten [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Hernebring, C., 2008. When the rain comes. Svenskt Vatten Utveckling Report nr. 2008–17Stockholm, Sweden: Svenskt Vatten [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., Deckmyn, A., Santos, C., Sattler, K., Bremnes, J.B., Feddersen, H., and Frogner, I.-L., 2011. Evaluation of ‘GLAMEPS’—a proposed multimodel EPS for short range forecasting. Tellus A, 63, 513–530.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B. and Chen, D., 2003. The influence of wind and topography on precipitation distribution in Sweden: Statistical analysis and modeling. International Journal of Climatology, 23, 1523–1535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, S., Rico-Ramirez, M.A., Schellart, A.N.A., and Saul, A.J., 2012. Using probabilistic radar rainfall nowcasts and NWP forecasts for flow prediction in urban catchments. Atmospheric Research, 103, 80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindskog, M., Gustafsson, N., Navascués, B., Mogensen, K.S., Huang, X.-Y., Yang, X., Andræ, U., Berre, L., Thorsteinsson, S., and Rantakokko, J., 2001. Three-dimensional variational data assimilation for a limited area model. Part II: observation handling and assimilation experiments. Tellus A, 53, 447–468.
   Google Scholar
• Lindström, G., Pers, C., Rosberg, J., Strömqvist, J., and Arheimer, B., 2010. Development and testing of the HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) water quality model for different spatial scales. Hydrology Research, 41, 295–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, D.B. and Koistinen, J., 2000. Gauge-radar network adjustment for the Baltic Sea experiment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth B, 25, 915–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, D., 2006. The Swedish weather radar production chain. Proceedings of ERAD 2006: 4^th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, 18-22 September 2006, Barcelona, Spain382–385.
   Google Scholar
• Niemczynowicz, J., 1984. An investigation of the areal and dynamic properties of rainfall and its influence on runoff generating processes. Report nr. 1005. LundSweden, Sweden: Department of Water Resources Engineering, Institute of Technology, Lund University. Available from: http://www.crahi.upc.edu/ERAD2006/proceedingsMask/00101.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ridal, M., Lindskog, M., Gustafsson, N., and Haase, G., 2011. Optimized advection of radar reflectivities. Atmospheric Research, 100, 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossa, A., Liechti, K., Zappa, M., Bruen, M., Germann, U., Haase, G., Keil, C., and Krahe, P., 2011. The COST 731 Action: a review on uncertainty propagation in advanced hydro-meteorological forecast systems. Atmospheric Research, 100, 150–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, M., Smith, J.A., Burges, S.J., Alonso, C.V., and Darden, R.W., 1999. Effect of bias adjustment and rain gauge data quality control on radar rainfall estimation. Water Resource Research, 35, 2487–2503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenskt Vatten, 2011. Precipitation data for design and analysis of sewer systems. Stockholm, Sweden: Svenskt Vatten AB [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Vincendon, B., Ducrocq, V., Nuissier, O., and Vié, B., 2011. Perturbation of convection-permitting NWP forecasts for flash-flood ensemble forecasting. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1529–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W., Chen, L., and Fu, B., 2009. Effects of rainfall change on water erosion processes in terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Progress in Physical Geography, 33, 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wern, L., 2012. Extreme precipitation in Sweden during 1 to 30 days, 1900–2011. Meteorology Report no. 2012-143Norrköping, Sweden: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Wern, L. and German, J., 2009. Short-term precipitation in Sweden 1995–2008. Meteorology Report no. 139/2009Norrköping, Sweden: Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, SE-601 76 [in Swedish].
   Google Scholar
• Wernli, H., Paulat, M., Hagen, M., and Frei, C., 2008. SAL - a novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts. Monthly Weather Review, 136, 4470–4487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, D.S., 1995. Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar