Optimisation of total water coverage in a network with priority using max-min ant system algorithm

References

• Afshar, M., 2006. Improving the efficiency of ant algorithms using adaptive refinement: application to storm water network design. Advances in Water Resources, 29 (9), 1371–1382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeder, C., 2010. A hybrid optimisation approach for multi- level capacitated lot- sizing problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 200, 599–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J., Harty, W.E. and Phillips, C.A., 2006. Sensor placement in municipal water networks with temporal integer programming models. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132 (4), 218–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coello, C.C., Lamont, G.B. and Van Veldhuizen, D.A., 2007. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-objective Problems. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harty, W.E. and Phillips, C.A., 2006. Sensor placement in municipal water networks with temporal integer programming models. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 132 (4), 218–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorigo, M., 1992. Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms. Thesis (PhD). Politecnico di Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., and Stützle. T., 2006. Ant colony optimization- artificial ants as a computational intelligence technique. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1, 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Giustolisi, O., Savic, D. and Kapelan, Z., 2008. Pressure- driven demand and leakages simulation for water distribution networks. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134 (5), 626–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. and Bartram, J., 2005. Effective water surveillance in urban areas of developing countries. Journal of Water and Health, 3 (1), 31–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Israel, M.A. and Lund, J.R., 1999. Priority preserving unit penalties in network flow modelling. Water Resources Planning and Management, 125 (4), 205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, P.A. and Barnes, J.W., 1980. Network flow programming. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jumani, A.D. and Khan, N., 2012. LP model for priority based water allocation. Sindh University Research Journal (Science Series), 44 (2), 255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Keedwell, E. and Khu, S.T., 2005. A hybrid genetic algorithm for the design of water distribution networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 18 (4), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S., Dassanayake, D., Mushtaq, S. and Hanjra, M.A., 2010. Predicting water allocations and trading prices to assist water markets. Irrigation and Drainage, 59, 388–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczera, G. and Diment, G., 1988. General water supply system simulation model: Wasp. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 114 (4), 365–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A., 2001. What do we know about pressure: leakage relationships in distribution systems? In: Proceedings of IWA Conference System Approach to Leakage Control and Water Distribution System Management, 16–18 May. Brno, Czech Republic: Brno University of Technology, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Laumanns, M., Thiele, L., Deb, K. and Zitzler, E., 2002. Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Evolutionary Computation, 10 (3), 263–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchi, A., Dandy, G.C., Wilkins, A. and Rohrlach, H., 2014. Methodology for comparing evolutionary algorithms for optimization of water distribution systems. Journal of Water Resources, Planning and Management, 140 (1), 22–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, K., 2013. Recent advances in problem understanding: changes in the landscape a year on. In: Proceeding of the Fifteenth Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, 6–10 July, SIGEVO, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. New York, NY: ACM, 1071–1078.
   Google Scholar
• McClymont, K., Keedwell, K. and Savic, D., 2015. An analysis of the interface between evolutionary algorithm operators and problem features for water resources problems. A case study in water distribution network design. Environmental Modelling and Software, 69, 414–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molle, F., 2004. Defining water rights: prescription or negotiation? Water Policy, 6, 207–227.
   Google Scholar
• Molle, F. and Berkoff, K., 2009. Cities vs. agriculture: a review of inter-sectorial water re-allocation. Natural Resources Forum, 33, 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, D. and Baran, B., 2005. Solving multi-objective multicast routing problem with a new ant colony optimization approach. In: Second IFIP/ACM Latin American Networking Conference (LANC’05), 10–13 October, Cali, Colombia. New York, NY: ACM, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Puust, R., Kapelan, Z., Savic, D.A. and Koppel, T., 2009. A review of methods for leakage management in pipe networks. Urban Water Journal, 7 (1), 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, J.M., Labadie, J.W. and Jones, E.B., 1981. Analysis of firm water supply under complex institutional constraints. Water Resources Bulletin, 17 (3), 373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Sigvaldason, O.T., 1976. A simulation model for operating a multi-purpose multi-reservoir system. Water Resource Research, 12 (2), 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodsoon, S., 2010. Max-Min Ant System for location-routing problems. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 17 (4), 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzle, T. and Hoos, H.H., 1997. The Max-Min Ant System and local search for the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation (ICEC’97). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Stutzle, T. and Hoos, H.H., 2000. Max-Min Ant System. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16, 889–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabesh, M., Tanyimboh, T.T. and Burrows, R., 2002. Head-driven simulation of water supply networks. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics, 15 (1), 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2005. Economic, social and cultural rights: Realization of the right to drinking water and sanitation. Commission on Human Rights, Sub-commission on The Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Session fifty-seven. Item 4.
   Google Scholar
• World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP), 2012. The United Nations World Water Development Report 4: Managing water under uncertainty and risk. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, D., Sieber, J., Prukey, D. and Huber-Lee, A., 2005. Weap21- a demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model. International Water Resources Association, Water International, 30 (4), 487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Zecchin, A.C., Maier, H.R., Simpson, A.R., Roberts, A.J., Berrisford, M.J., and Leornard, M., 2003. Max-Min Ant System applied to water distribution system optimisation. In: Proceedings MODSIM 2003: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 14–17 July, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. Perth, Australia: Modelling & Simulation Society of Australia & New Zealand, 795–800.
   Google Scholar