Intrinsic relationship between energy consumption, pressure, and leakage in water distribution systems

References

• Ang, W.K. and Jowitt, P.W., 2006. Solution for water distribution systems under pressure-deficient conditions. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 132 (3), 175–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assela, P., 2010. EPANET2 desktop application for pressure driven demand modeling. 12th Annual Conference on Water Distribution Systems Analysis (WDSA), 12-15 September. Tucson, AZ: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Atlantic Canada Water Works Association (ACWWA), 2004. Atlantic Canada guidelines for the supply, treatment, storage, distribution, and operation of drinking water supply systems. New Brunswick, Canada: Atlantic Canada Water Works Association.
   Google Scholar
• Campisano, A., Modica, C., and Vetrano, L., 2012. Calibration of proportional controllers for the RTC of pressures to reduce leakage in water distribution networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 138, 377–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, A.F. and Karney, B.W., 2002. Energy and costs of leaky pipes: Toward a comprehensive picture. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 128 (6), 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, A.F. and Karney, B.W., 2005. Impacts of leaks on energy consumption in pumped systems with storage. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 131 (2), 146–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creaco, E. and Franchini, M., 2013. A new algorithm for the real-time pressure control in water distribution networks. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 13 (4), 875–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, Y.R., MacLean, H.L., and Karney, B.W., 2004. Life-cycle energy analysis of a water distribution system. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10 (3), 120–130.
   Google Scholar
• Germanopoulos, G., 1985. A technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2 (3), 171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Gessler, J., 1985. Pipe network optimization by enumeration. In: H.C. Torno, ed. Computer Applications in Water Resources. New York: ASCE, 572–581.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian, V., Karney, B.W., and Guo, Y., 2015a. Minimum pressure criterion in water distribution systems: challenges and consequences. EWRI 2015, Floods, Droughts, and Ecosystems: Managing Our Resources Despite Growing Demands and Diminishing Funds. Austin, TX: EWRI, 777–791.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorbanian, V., Karney, B.W., and Guo, Y., 2015b. The link between transient surges and minimum pressure criterion in water distribution systems. In: Pipelines Conference: Recent Advances in Underground Pipeline Engineering & Construction, 23–26 August. Baltimore, MA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, R., Sa Marques, A., and Sousa, J., 2011. Estimation of the benefits yielded by pressure management in water distribution systems. Urban Water Journal, 8 (2), 65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. and Bhave, P.R., 1996. Comparison of methods for predicting deficient-network performance. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 122 (3), 214–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun, L. and Guoping, Y., 2013. Iterative methodology of pressure-dependent demand based on EPANET for pressure-deficient water distribution analysis. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 139 (1), 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, A., Fantozzi, M., and Thornton, J., 2013. Practical approaches to modeling leakage and pressure management in distribution systems – progress since 2005. In: 12th International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry, CCWI2013, 2–4 September. Perugia, Italy: Procedia Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, A.O., 1997. Pressure management/leakage relationships: theory, concepts, and practical applications. In: International Quality and Productivity Centre (IQPC) Seminar, 2–5 April. London: IQPC.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, A.O., 2000. What do we know about pressure: leakage relationships in distribution systems? In: Proceedings of the Int. Water Association (IWA) conference on system approach to leakage control and water distribution systems management, 16–18 May. Brno, Czech Republic: IWA.
   Google Scholar
• LeChevallier, M.W., Yang, J., Xu, M., Hughes, D., and Kunkel, G., 2014. Pressure Management: Industry Practices and Monitoring Procedures. Denver, CO: Water Research Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore, S. and Sechi, G.M., 2009. Location and calibration of valves in water distribution networks using a scatter-search meta-heuristic approach. Water Resources Management, 23 (8), 1479–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteith, H.D., Sahely, H.R., MacLean, H.L., and Bagley, D.M., 2005. A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Environment Research, 77 (4), 390–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossman, L.A., 2000. EPANET2 Users Manual. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sahely, H.R. and Kennedy, C.A., 2007. Water use model for quantifying environmental and economic sustainability indicators. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 133 (6), 550–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siew, C. and Tanyimboh, T., 2011. The Computational Efficiency of EPANET-PDX. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2011, Bearing Knowledge for Sustainability, 22–26 May. Palm Springs, CA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Tucciarelli, T., Criminisi, A., and Termini, D., 1999. Leak analysis in pipeline systems by means of optimal valve regulation. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125 (3), 277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undie, S., Peters, G., and Beavis, P., 2004. Life Cycle Assessment for sustainable metropolitan water systems planning. Environment Science Technology, 38 (13), 3465–3473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walski, T.M., et al., 1987. Battle of the network models: Epilogue. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 113 (2), 191–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walski, T.M., Chase, D.V., Savic, D.A., Grayman, W.M., Bechwith, S., and Koelle, E., 2007. Advanced Water Distribution Modeling and Management. Watertown, CT: Haestad Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z.Y., Rong, H.W., Walski, T.M., Shao, Y.Y., Bowdler, D., and Baggett, C.C., 2009. Extended global-gradient algorithm for pressure-dependent water distribution analysis. Journal of Water Resource Planning and Management, 135 (1), 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar