Improved understanding of combined sewer systems using the Illinois Conveyance Analysis Program (ICAP)

References

• Bahkmeteff, B.A., 1932. Hydraulics of open channels. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, G.W., 2010. HEC-RAS hydraulic reference manual, 4.1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA, USA, Jan 2010 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Cantone, J. and Schmidt, A.R., 2011. Improved understanding and prediction of the hydrologic response of highly urbanized catchments through development of the illinois urban hydrologic model. Water Resources Research, 47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, V.T., Maidment, D. and Mays, L.W., 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Hydraulics Institute, 2009. Danish Hydraulics Institute MOUSE pipe flow reference manual.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, D.D. and Melching, C.S., 1997. Full Equations (FEQ) model for the solution of the full, dynamic equations of motion for one-dimensional unsteady flow in open channels and through control structures. Water-Resources Investigations Report 96--4240, U.S. Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, N.L., Gifford-Miears, C., Leon, A.S., et al., 2014. Efficient computation of unsteady flow in complex river systems with uncertain inputs. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 91 (4), 781–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Castro, J. and Yen, B.C., 2000a. Applicability of the hydraulic performance graph for unsteady flow routing. Hydraulic Engineering Series 64, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• González-Castro, J. and Yen, B.C., 2000b. Open-channel capacity determination using hydraulic performance graph. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 126, 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, W.H., 1999. Wastewater hydraulics: Theory and practice. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamam, M.A. and McCorquodale, J.A., 1982. Transient conditions in the transition from gravity to surcharged sewer flow. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 9, 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, F.M., 1966. Open channel flow. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, M.A., 2005. Unsteady flow routing using predetermined solutions to the equations for conservation of mass and momentum. Thesis (Master’s). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, B.J. and Oberg, N., 2016. HPG-Util: A software tool for developing hydraulic performance graphs using HEC-RAS. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Leon, A.S., Kanashiro, E.A. and Gonz\’alez-Castro, J., 2013. Fast approach for unsteady flow routing in complex river networks based on performance graphs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (3), 284–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, V.M., Mier, J.M. and García, M.H., 2015. Innovative modeling framework for combined sewer overflows prediction. Urban Water Journal, 14 , 97–111.10.1080/1573062X.2015.1057183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon, A.S., Kanashiro, E.A., Valverde, R., et al., 2014. Dynamic framework for intelligent control of river flooding: Case study. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140 (2), 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg, N., Bondar, C., Hoy, M., et al., 2006. Conveyance analysis of Chicago’s “Deep Tunnel” system. Omaha: World Environmental and Water Resource Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, L.A., 2008. Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 5.0. Water Supply and Water Resources Division. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-05/040..
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A.R., 2002. Analysis of stage-discharge relations for open-channel flows and their associated uncertainties. Thesis (PhD). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, A.R., Ghidaoui, M.S., Leon, A.S., et al., 2005. Review of sewer surcharging phenomena and models. In: Proceedings of XXXI IAHR Congress, Seoul, Korea, 257–258.
   Google Scholar
• Tibbetts, J., 2005. Combined sewer systems: Down, dirty, and out of date. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113 (7), A464–A467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2016. Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), Available from: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/combined-sewer-overflows-csos.
   Google Scholar
• Wallingford Software, 2002. Hydraulic theory. InfoWorks User Manual version 5.5. Wallingford Software, Wallingford Software, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, R. and Yen, B.C., 1992. Sensitivity of flood routing models to variations of momentum equation coefficients and terms. Hydraulic Engineering Series 41, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, B.C. and González-Castro, J., 1994. Determination of Boneyard Creek flow capacity by hydraulic performance graph. Research Report 219, Water Resources Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Water Resources Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, B.C. and Mays, L.W., 2001. Hydraulics of sewer systems in stormwater collection systems design handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, A., Schmidt, A.R., Ostfeld, A., et al., 2013. New method for the offline solution of pressurized and supercritical flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139, 935–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar