Online water-use feedback: household user interest, savings and implications

References

• Beal, C.D. and Flynn, J., 2015. Toward the digital water age: Survey and case studies of Australian water utility smart-metering programs. Utilities Policy, 32, 29–37. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, C.D., et al., 2013. Mind or machine? Examining the drivers of residential water end-use efficiency. Journal of the Australian Water Association, 40 (3), 66–70.
   Google Scholar
• Bonino, D., Corno, F., and De Russis, L., 2012. Home energy consumption feedback: A user survey. Energy and Buildings, 47, 383–393. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, T., et al., 2013. Intelligent metering for urban water: A review. Water, 5 (3), 1052–1081. doi:10.3390/w5031052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, K., Russo, R. and Anderson, B., 2014. Feeding back about eco-feedback: How do consumers use and respond to energy monitors? Energy Policy, 73, 138–146. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, G. and Stewart, R., 2013. Smart meter enabled disaggregation of urban peak water demand: Precursor to effective urban water planning. Urban Water Journal, 10 (3), 174–194. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2012.716446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., Harrison, C., and Filius, P., 1998. Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30 (8), 1445–1460. doi:10.1068/a301445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, K., et al., 2014. Water-saving impacts of smart meter technology: An empirical 5 year, whole-of-community study in Sydney. Water Resources Research, 50, 7348–7358. doi:10.1002/2014WR015812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T., et al., 2012. The Dubuque water portal: Evaluation of the uptake, use and impact of residential water consumption feedback. In: CHI 2012 May 5-10, 2012. Austin Texas, USA: ACM, 675–684.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, A., Sergici, S., and Sharif, A., 2010. The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption: A survey of the experimental evidence. Energy, 35 (4), 1598–1608. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, K.S., et al., 2013. An experimental test of voluntary strategies to promote urban water demand management. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giurco, D., et al., 2013. Modelling bounce-back in water consumption post-drought. Journal of the Australian Water Association, 40 (5), 79–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, T., 2005. Motivating sustainable consumption: A review of evidence on consumer behaviour and behavioural change. Guildford: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. doi:10.1080/1350462022014540
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A., et al., 2013. Smart metering and billing: Information to guide household water consumption. Journal of the Australian Water Association, 40 (5), 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A., Giurco, D., and Mukheibir, P., 2014. Online household water portal: User interactions and perceptions of water use. In: Book of Abstracts, 2014 SWGIC, Smart Water Grid International Conference. 25–27 November, 2014. Incheon, South Korea, 102–108.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, A., Giurco, D., and Mukheibir, P., 2015. Motivating metrics for household water-use feedback. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 103, 29–46. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, A., Giurco, D., and Mukheibir, P., 2016. Urban water conservation through customised water and end-use information. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3164–3175. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Torres, M.R., et al., 2008. A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27 (6), 495–505. doi:10.1080/01449290600958965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MidCoast Water, 2015. Midcoast water water supplies. Available from: http://www.midcoastwater.com.au/site/water-supplies [Accessed 22 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, J.E., et al., 2007. Dormitory residents reduce electricity consumption when exposed to real-time visual feedback and incentives. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8 (1), 16–33. doi:10.1108/14676370710717562
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, J., et al., 2011. Smart metering in Germany and Austria: Results of providing feedback information in a field trial. Work. Pap. S6/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R.A., et al., 2013. Showering behavioural response to alarming visual display monitors: Longitudinal mixed method study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32 (7), 695–711. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2011.577195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., et al., 2008. Guide to demand management. Prepared for Water Services Association of Australia by the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures. New South Wales: University Of Technology Sydney (UTS).
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam, S.S., Bakker, C.A. and van Hal, J.D.M., 2010. Home energy monitors: Impact over the medium-term. Building Research & Information, 38 (5), 458–469. doi:10.1080/09613218.2010.494832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhite, H. and Ling, R., 1995. Measured energy savings from a more informative energy bill. Energy and Buildings, 22, 145–155.10.1016/0378-7788(94)00912-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar