Effects of flood hazard visualization format on house purchasing decisions

References

• Bell, H. M., and G. A. Tobin. 2007. “Efficient and Effective? the 100-Year Flood in the Communication and Perception of Flood Risk.” Environmental Hazards 7 (4): 302–311. doi:10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.08.004.
   Google Scholar
• Beven, K., R. Lamn, D. Leedal, and N. Hunter. 2015. “Communicating Uncertainty in Flood Inundation Mapping: A Case Study.” International Journal of River Basin Management 13 (3): 285–295. doi:10.1080/15715124.2014.917318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., J. Fielding, and D. Thrush. 2008. “It’ll Never Happen to Me’: Understanding Public Awareness of Local Flood Risk.” Disasters 32 (2): 216–238. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01036.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., and P. Shah. 1998. “A Model of the Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Graph Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4 (2): 75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S., and R. McGill. 1986. “An Experiment in Graphical Perception.” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25 (5): 491–500. doi:10.1016/S0020-7373(86)80019-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Directive, E. U. 2007. “60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks.” Journal of the European Union L 288: 27.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. 2005. “Multimedia Learning about Physical Systems.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 445–465. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., and T. Wagener. 2011. “10 Rules for Effective Data Visualization.” Environmental Modeling and Software. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellens, W., T. Terpstra, and P. D. Maeyer. 2013. “Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research.” Risk Analysis 33 (1): 24–49. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, C., M. Siegrist, and H. Gutscher. 2006. “The Role of the Affect and Availability Heuristics in Risk Communication.” Risk Analysis 26 (3): 631–639. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, S., and M. Hegarty. 2007. “Top-Down and Bottom-Up Influences on Learning from Animations.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65 (11): 911–930. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., A. L. Holbrook, M. K. Berent, R. T. Carson, W. Michael Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, … W. R. Moody. 2002. “The Impact Of” No Opinion” Response Options on Data Quality: Non-Attitude Reduction or an Invitation to Satisfice?” Public Opinion Quarterly 66 (3): 371–403. doi:10.1086/341394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leskens, J. G., C. Kehl, T. Tutenel, T. Kol, G. de Haan, G. Stelling, and E. Eisemann. 2017. “An Interactive Simulation and Visualization Tool for Flood Analysis Usable for Practitioners.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 22: 307–324. doi:10.1007/s11027-015-9651-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., J. Zhang, J. Sun, and J. Wang. 2017. “A Visual Analytics Approach for Flood Risk Analysis and Decision-Making in Cultural Heritage.” Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 41: 89–99. doi:10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., and S. N. Hwang. 2008. “Households’ Perceived Personal Risk and Responses in a Multihazard Environment.” Risk Analysis 28 (2): 539–556. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludy, J., and M. G. Kondolf. 2012. “Flood Risk Perception in Lands “Protected” by 100-Year Levees.” Natural Hazards 61: 829–842. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0072-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroof, D. A. 2012. “Binary Logistic Regression.” Statistical Methods in Neuropsychology, 67–75. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moel, H. D., J. Alphen, and J. C. J. H. Aerts. 2009. “Flood Maps in Europe–Methods, Availability and Use.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 9 (2): 289–301. doi:10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2006. Completing the Forecast: Characterizing and Communicating Uncertainty for Better Decision Using Weather and Climate Forecasts. Washingt DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R., R. Ashley, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, and A. Cashman. 2011. “Managing Water as a Socio-Technical System: The Shift from ‘Experts’ to ‘Alliances’.” Engineering Sustainability 164 (ES1): 95–102. doi:10.1680/ensu.1000032.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, E., F. Brereton, H. Shahumyan, and P. J. Clinch. 2016. “The Impact of Perceived Flood Exposure on Flood-Risk Perception: The Role of Distance.” Risk Analysis 36 (11): 2158–2816. doi:10.1111/risa.12597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagneux, E., G. Gísladóttir, and S. Jónsdóttir. 2011. “Public Perception of Flood Hazard and Flood Risk in Iceland: A Case Study in a Watershed Prone to Ice-Jam Floods.” Natural Hazards 58 (1): 269–287. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9665-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappenberger, F., Stephens, E., Thielen, J., Salamon, P., Demeritt, D., Van Andel, SJ., Wetterhall, F. and Alfieri, L. 2013. “Visualizing Probabilistic Flood Forecast infromationL: Expert Preferences and Perceptions of Best Practice in Uncertainty Communication.” Hydrological Processes 27: 132–146. doi:10.1002/hyp.9253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. 1990. “A Theory of Graph Comprehension.” Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, 73–126. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ratwani, R. M., and J. G. Trafton. 2008. “Thinking Graphically: Connecting Vision and Cognition during Graph Comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14 (1): 36–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. P. 2016. “Helping Local Residents Make Informed Decisions with Interactive Risk Visualization Tools.” Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, 30–35. New York: ACM, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rollason, E., L. J. Bracken, R. J. Hardy, and A. R. G. Large. 2018. “Rethinking Flood Risk Communication.” Natural Hazards 92 (3): 1665–1686. doi:10.1007/s11069-018-3273-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, P., and E. G. Freedman. 2011. “Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (3): 560–578. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01066.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, P., R. E. Mayer, and M. Hegarty. 1999. “Graphs as Aids to Knowledge Construction: Signaling Techniques for Guiding the Process of Graph Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (4): 690. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and G. Heinz. 2008. “Natural Hazards and Motivation for Mitigation Behavior: People Cannot Predict the Affect Evoked by a Severe Flood.” Risk Analysis 28 (3): 771–778. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01049.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and H. Gutscher. 2006. “Flooding Risks: A Comparison of Lay People’s Perceptions and Expert’s Assessments in Switzerland.” Risk Analysis 26 (4): 971–979. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. I. 2000. “Floodplain Management: Problems, Issues and Opportunities.” In Floods, edited by D. J. Parker, 254–267. Vol. I. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, S. 2007. Climate Change 2007-The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Vol. 4. s.l.: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelhalter, D. 2017. “Risk and Uncertainty Communication.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 4: 31–60. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathie, A., G. Netto, G. H. Walker, and G. Pender. 2017. “How Presentation Format Affects the Interpretation of Probabilistic Flood Risk Information.” Journal of Flood Risk Management 10 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brinke, W. B., G. E. Saeijs, I. Helsloot, and J. van Alphen. 2008. “Safety Chain Approach in Flood Risk Management.” Proceedings of the ICE-Municipal Engineer 161 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1680/muen.2008.161.2.93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., and J. I. Campbell. 2004. “A Power Struggle: Between-Vs. Within-Subjects Designs in Deductive Reasoning Research.” Psychologia 47 (4): 277–296. doi:10.2117/psysoc.2004.277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., J. H. Elder, M. Kubovy, S. E. Palmer, M. A. Peterson, M. Singh, and R. von der Heydt. 2012. “A Century Of Gestalt Psychology in Visual Perception: I. Perceptual Grouping and Figure–ground Organization.” Psychological Bulletin 138: 1172–1217.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. 1938. “Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms.” In A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, 71–88. London: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
   Google Scholar