The importance of gully flow modelling to urban flood simulation

References

• Bazin, P. H., H. Nakagawa, K. Kawaike, A. Paquier, and E. Mignot. 2014. “Modeling Flow Exchanges between a Street and an Underground Drainage Pipe during Urban Floods.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 140 (10): 0401405. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermudez, M., V. Ntegeka, V. Wolfs, and P. Willems. 2018. “Development and Comparison of Two Fast Surrogate Models for Urban Pluvial Flood Simulations.” Water Resources Management 32 (8): 2801–2815. doi:10.1007/s11269-018-1959-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsch, R., V. Glenis, and C. Kilsby. 2017. “Urban Flood Simulation Using Synthetic Storm Drain Networks.” Water 9: 925–939. doi:10.3390/w9120925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. J., C. H. Wang, and A. S. Chen. 2015. “A Novel Approach to Model Dynamic Flow Interactions between Storm Sewer System and Overland Surface for Different Land Covers in Urban Areas.” Journal of Hydrology 524: 662–679. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. J., C. H. Wang, A. S. Chen, and S. Djordjević. 2018. “The Influence of Inlet Drainage in Modelling Flow Interactions between Storm Sewer System and Overland Surface.” Journal of Hydrology 559: 541–555. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courant, R., K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy. 1967. “On the Partial Difference Equations of Mathematical Physics.” IBM Journal of Research & Development 11 (2): 215–234. doi:10.1147/rd.112.0215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunge, J. A., and M. Wegner 1964. “Numerical Integration of Bane De Saint Venant’s Flow Equations by Means of an Implicit Scheme of Finite Differences.” Applications in the Case of Alternately free and Pressurized Flow in a Tunnel. La Houille Blanche, No. 1, 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Djordjevic´, S., A. J. Saul, G. R. Tabor, J. Blanksby, I. Galambos, N. Sabtu, and G. Sailor. 2013. “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Interactions between above and below Ground Drainage Systems.” Water Science & Technology 67: 535–542. doi:10.2166/wst.2012.570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Y., T. Ao, H. Yu, G. Huang, and X. Li. 2017. “A Coupled 1D-2D Hydrodynamic Model for Urban Flood Inundation.” Advances in Meteorology 2017: 2819308. doi:10.1155/2017/2819308.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2009. Urban Drainage Design Manual. Hydraulic Engineering Circular 22. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, M., J. Recasens, B. Russo, and E. Martinez-Gomariz. 2016. “Assessment of Inlet Efficiency through a 3D Simulation: Numerical and Experimental Comparison.” Water Science & Technology 74: 1926–1935. doi:10.2166/wst.2016.326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmfelt, A. T. 1991. “Investigation of Curve Number Procedure.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 117 (6): 725–737. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:6(725).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, M. H., S. H. Chen, and T. J. Chang. 2000. “Inundation Simulation for Urban Drainage Basin with Storm Sewer System.” Journal of Hydrology 234: 21–37. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00237-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, N. M., P. D. Bates, M. S. Horritt, and M. D. Wilson. 2007. “Simple Spatially-distributed Models for Predicting Flood Inundation: A Review.” Geomorphology 90 (3–4): 208–225. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innovyze. 2013. InfoWorks ICM v.3.5. Wallingford, UK: Innovyze.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanbazi, M., and U. Egger. 2014. “Application and Comparison of Two Different Dual Drainage Models to Assess Urban Flooding.” Urban Water Journal 11: 584–595. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2013.871041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. H. 2015. “An Advanced Method to Apply Multiple Rainfall Thresholds for Urban Flood Warnings.” Water 7: 6056–6078. doi:10.3390/w7116056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. H., T. H. Chang, and W. B. Chen. 2018. “Effect of Inlet Modelling on Surface Drainage in Coupled Urban Flood Simulation.” Journal of Hydrology 562: 168–180. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. H., P. S. Yu, S. H. Yeh, J. C. Fu, and C. J. Huang. 2012. “A Probabilistic Model for Real- Time Flood Warning Based on Deterministic Flood Inundation Mapping.” Hydrological Processes 26 (7): 1079–1089. doi:10.1002/hyp.8220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiry, S. N., D. Sen, and P. D. Bates. 2010. “A Coupled 1d-quasi 2D Flood Inundation Model with Unstructured Grids.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 136 (8): 493–506. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leandro, J., and R. Martins. 2016. “A Methodology for Linking 2D Overland Flow Models with the Sewer Network Model SWMM 5.1 Based on Dynamic Link Libraries.” Water Science & Technology 73: 3017. doi:10.2166/wst.2016.171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. S., H. Nakagawa, K. Kawaike, and H. Zhang. 2013. “Experimental Validation of Interaction Model at Storm Drain for Development of Integrated Urban Inundation Model.” Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. B1 69 (4): I_109-I_114.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, P., J. Leandro, R. F. Carvalho, B. Russo, and M. Gómez. 2016. “Assessment of the Ability of a Volume of Fluid Model to Reproduce the Efficiency of a Continuous Transverse Gully with Grate.” Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 142: 04016039. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodian, M., J. P. Carbajal, V. Bellos, U. Leopold, G. Schutz, and F. Clemens. 2018. “A Hybrid Surrogate Modelling Strategy for Simplification of Detailed Urban Drainage Simulators.” Water Resources Management 32 (15): 5241–5256. doi:10.1007/s11269-018-2157-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, R., J. Leandro, A. S. Chen, and S. Djordjevic´. 2017. “A Comparison of Three Dualdrainage Models: Shallow Water Vs Local Inertial Vs Diffusive Wave.” Journal of Hydroinformatics 10: 331–348. doi:10.2166/hydro.2017.075.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, R., J. Leandro, and R. F. de Carvalho. 2014. “Characterization of the Hydraulic Performance of a Gully under Drainage Conditions.” Water Science & Technology 69: 2423. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S. J. 1982. “A Model for Assessment of Weather Forecasts.” Australian Meteorological Magazine 30: 291–303.
   Google Scholar
• Noh, S. J., S. Lee, H. An, K. Kawaike, and H. Nakagawa. 2016. “Ensemble Urban Flood Simulation in Comparison with Laboratory-scale Experiments: Impact of Interaction Models for Manhole, Sewer Pipe, and Surface Flow.” Advances in Water Resources 97: 25–27. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. National Engineering Handbook. Part 630 Hydrology, Chapter 10 – Estimation of Direct Runoff from Storm Rainfall. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, B., D. Sunyer, M. Velasco, and S. Djordjević. 2015. “Analysis of Extreme Flooding Events through a Calibrated 1D/2D Coupled Model: The Case of Barcelona (spain).” Journal of Hydroinformatics 17: 473. doi:10.2166/hydro.2014.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyoum, S. D., Z. Vojinovic, R. K. Price, and S. Weesakul. 2012. “Coupled 1D and Noninertia 2D Flood Inundation Model for Simulation of Urban Flooding.” Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 138: 23–34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Software, X. P. 2005. XP-SWMM EXPert Stormwater and Wastewater Management Model. Canberra: Reference Manual.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, E., G. Schumann, and P. Bates. 2014. “Problems with Binary Pattern Measures for Flood Model Evaluation.” Hydrological Processes 28 (18): 4928–4937. doi:10.1002/hyp.v28.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar