Evaluating the effects of soil data quality on the SWAT runoff prediction Performance; A case study of Saz-Cayirova catchment, Turkey

References

• Abasspour, K. C., J. Yang, I. Maximov, R. Siber, K. Bogner, J. Mieleitner, and R. Srinavasan. 2007. “Modeling Hydrology and Water Quality in the Pre-Alpine/Alpine Thur Watershed Using SWAT.” Journal of Hydrology 333 (2–4): 413–430. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbaspour, K.C. 2007. User Manual for SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Programs. EAWAG, Dubendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. J., E. E. Hardy, T. J. Roach, and E. R. Witmer. 1976. “A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data.” Geological Survey Professional. Washington, USA: US Government Printing Office. doi:10.3133/pp964.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J., M. Daniel, and P. Gassman. 2012. “SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation.“ Transactions of the ASABE 1491–1508. doi:10.13031/2013.42256.
   Google Scholar
• Atasayan, Ö., P. Ö. Küçükyağcı, and Ö. Çalışkan. 2013. “Çayirova (Saz) Deresi Çevresinin Doğal Peyzaj Dönüşümünün Değerlendirilmesi.” In Landscape Architecture 5th Congress. Adana, Turkey, 1196–1202.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandari, K., K. Arnaud, R. Thakali, and A. Kaira. 2018. “Effects of Soil Data Resolution on the Simulated Stream Flow and Water Quality: Application of Watershed-Based SWAT Model.“ In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Minneapolis, Minnesota, 376–386. doi:10.1061/9780784481400.035.
   Google Scholar
• Bren, L. 2015. Forest Hydrology and Catchment Management. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Busico, G., N. Colombani, D. Fronzi, M. Pellegrini, A. Tazioli, and M. Mastrocicco. 2020. “Evaluating SWAT Model Performance, considering Different Soils Data Input, to Quantify Actual and Future Runoff Susceptibility in a Highly Urbanized Basin.” Journal of Environmental Management 266: 110625. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canik, B. 2007. Hydrogeology; Exploration, Operation, Chemistry of Groundwater. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara University Faculty of Science, Department of Geology.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H.-S., Q. Su, and T. Katayama. 2021. “Research on Establishment of the Region Flood Protection Standard - a Case of Watershed of Dajiaxi, Taiwan.” Urban Water Journal 18 (3): 173–182. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2020.1864831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., C. Xu, X. Chen, Y. Xy, Y. Yin, L. Gao, and M. Liu. 2019. “Uncertainty in Simulation of Land-use Change Impacts on Catchment Runoff with Multi-timescales Based on the Comparison of the HSPF and SWAT Models.” Journal of Hydrology 573: 486–500. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comino, R.J., D.S. Keesstra, and A. Cerdà. 2018. “Connectivity Assessment in Mediterranean Vineyards Using Improved Stock Unearthing Method, LiDAR and Soil Erosion Field Surveys.” Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 43 (10): 2193–2206. doi:10.1002/esp.4385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuceloglu, G., K. C. Abbaspour, and I Ozturk. 2017. “Assessing the Water-Resources Potential of Istanbul by Using a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrological Model.” Water 9 (10): 814. doi:10.3390/w9100814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Luzio, M., J. G. Arnold, and R. Srinivasan. 2005. “Effect of GIS Data Quality on Small Watershed Stream Flow and Sediment Simulations.” Hydrological Processes 19 (3): 629–650. doi:10.1002/hyp.5612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. (1998). “FAO‐Unesco Soil Map of the World, Revised Legend, with Corrections and Updates.” Wageningen: World Soil Resources Report 60, FAO, Rome; reprinted with updates as Technical Paper 20 by ISRIC.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show%3Fid=14116
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, K. 2014. Analysis and Modelling of Water Supply and Deman under Climate Change, Land Use Transformation and Socio-Economic Development. Texas: Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01610-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzky, H., E. Dooley, and I.L. Heuser. 2019. International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy”. Vol. 3. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68885-5.
   Google Scholar
• GIRI CPP. 2012. Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover: Principles and Applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/b11964.
   Google Scholar
• Hız, H. (2000). The pollution of Çayırova stream and its impact on the Marmara Sea ( Master Thesis). Kocaeli, Turkey: Gebze Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Jajarmizadeh, M., S. Harun, R. Abdullah, and M. Salarpour. 2012. “Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool for Flow Simulation and Assessment of Sensitive Parameters Applying SUFI-2 Algorithm.” Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2 (1): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jan, V., M. Janecek, and M. Tıppl. 2007. “Revised Soil Erodibility K-factor for Soils in the Czech Republic.” Soil and Water Research 2: 1–9. doi:10.17221/2100-SWR.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, L. 2015. Identification of Forensic Information from Existing Conventional Site-Investigation Data. Introduction to Environmental Forensics, 149–164. Third ed. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-404696-2.00006-0.
   Google Scholar
• Keesstra, S., P. J. Nunes, P. Saco, T. Parsons, R. Poeppl, R. Masselink, and A. Cerdà. 2018. “The Way Forward: Can Connectivity Be Useful to Design Better Measuring and Modelling Schemes for Water and Sediment Dynamics?” Science of the Total Environment 644: 1557–1572. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, T., K. Eckhardt, N. Fohrer, and H. G. Frede. 2002. “Comparison of Two Different Approaches of Sensitivity Analysis.” Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27 (9–10): 645–654. doi:10.1016/S1474-7065(02)00049-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levick, L. R., D. J. Semmens, D. P. Guertin, I. S. Burns, S. N. Scott, C. L. Unkrich, and D. C. Goodrich (2004). “Adding Global Soils Data to the Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment Tool (AGWA).” Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Transboundary Waters Management. Tucson.
   Google Scholar
• Manns, H. R., and A. B. Aaron. 2014. “Importance of Soil Organic Carbon on Surface Soil Water Content Variability among Agricultural Fields.” Journal of Hydrology 516: 297–303. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengistu, G., and E. M. John. 2008. “Effects of Soil Data Resolution on SWAT Model Stream Flow and Water Quality Predictions.” Journal of Environmental Management 88 (1): 28–41. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.042.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moriasi, D., J. Arnold, L. Van, M. Bingner, R. Harmel, and T. Veith. 2007. “Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations.” Trans. ASABE (American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers) 50: 885–900. doi:10.13031/2013.23153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttiah, R. S., and R. A. Wurbs. 2002. “Scale-dependent Soil and Climate Variability Effects on Watershed Water Balance of the SWAT Model.” Journal of Hydrology 256 (3–4): 264–285. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00554-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2002. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation. US: USDA‐ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2009. Soil And Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation, Version 2009. Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Center. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/128050
   Google Scholar
• Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry, and J. R. Williams. 2011. “Soil And Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation.” In Version 2011. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, USA: Agricultural Research Service and Blackland Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, F., N. Pradhan, C. Downer, and J A. Zahner. 2011. “Relative Importance of Impervious Area, Drainage Density, Width Function, and Subsurface Storm Drainage on Flood Runoff from an Urbanized Catchment.” Water Resources Research 47 (12). doi:10.1029/2011WR010550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver, H., L. Andre, and l. Gerry. 2001. “Loss on Ignition as a Method for Estimating Organic and Carbonate Content in Sediments: Reproducibility and Comparability of Results.” Journal of Paleolimnology 25 :101–110. doi:10.1023/A:1008119611481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oruç, H.N., and Çelen, M. 2021.“Evaluating The Effects Of Soil Data Quality On The Swat Model Runoff Prediction Performance In A Highly Industrialized Catchment; Case Study In Saz-Çayirova Stream, Turkey.“ Master thesis, Gebze Technical University. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, D., and F. Batuk (2011). “SCS Yüzey Akış Eğri Numarasının Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri ile Belirlenmesi.” TUFUAB VI. Technical Symposium, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Peschel, J. M., P. K. Haan, and R. E. Lacey. 2003. A SSURGO Pre-Processing Extension for the Arc View Soil and Water Assessment Tool. ASAE Annual Meeting. doi:10.13031/2013.14952.
   Google Scholar
• Rio, M., C. Salles, and M.-G. Tournoud. 2020. “Modelling the Effects of Stormwater Control Measures on Runoff Volume and Particulate Load in Urban Catchments.” Urban Water Journal 79–90. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2020.1860236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanowicz, A. A., M. Vanclooster, M. Rounsevell, and I. Junesse. 2005. “Sensitivity of the SWAT Model to the Soil and Land Use Data Parameterization: A Case Study in the Thyle catchment,Belgium.” Ecological Modelling 187 (1): 27–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosolem, R., H. V. Gupta, W. J. Shuttleworth, X. Zeng, and L. G. Goncalves. 2012. “A Fully Multiple-criteria Implementation of the Sobol’ Method for Parameter Sensitivity Analysis.” Journal of Geophysical 117 (D7). doi:10.1029/2011JD016355.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, and Famiglietti. 2006. Multi-scale Spatial Correlation and Scaling Behavior of Surface Soil Moisture. Vol. 33. Geophysical Research Letters. doi:10.1029/2006GL025831.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, Rawls, K E. Saxton, and W J. Rawls. 2006. “Soil Water Characteristic Estimates by Texture and Organic Matter for Hydrologic Solutions.” Soil Science Society of America Journal 70 (5): 1569–1578. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setegn, S. G., R. Srinivasan, A. M. Melesse, and B. Dargahi. 2010. “SWAT Model Application and Prediction Uncertainty Analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia.” Hydrological Processes 24: 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, X., X. Wang, D. Zhang, W. Chen, X. Chen, and H. Kong. 2012. “An Improved SWAT-based Computational Framework for Identifying Critical Source Areas for Agricultural Pollution at the Lake Basin Scale.” Ecological Modelling 226: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., B. V. Wasemael, D. Bartholomeus, B. Rosillon, B. Tychon, and E. Ben-Dor. 2008. “Laboratory, Field and Airborne Spectroscopy for Monitoring Organic Carbon Content in Agricultural Soils.” Geoderma 144 (1–2): 395–404. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, W., G. Xu, P. Gong, and S. Liang. 2006. “Fractal Analysis of Remotely Sensed Images: A Review of Methods and Applications.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 27 (22): 4963–4990. doi:10.1080/01431160600676695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., and M. McMahon (1972). “The Relation between Soil Characteristics,water Movement and Nitrate Concentration of Ground Water.” Lexington: Kentucky Water Resources Institute Research Report No. 52.
   Google Scholar
• Tüzüner, A. 1990. Soil and Water Analysis Laboratories Handbook. Ankara: General Directorate of Rural Service Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Walkley, A., and I A. Black. 1934. “An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method.” Soil Sciences 37 (1): 29–38. doi:10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., C. Jones, and P. T. Dyke. 1984. “A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship between Erosion and Soil Productivity.” Transactions of the ASAE 27: 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Yaseen, Z. M., S. O. Sulaiman, R. C. Deo, and K. Chau. 2019. “An Enhanced Extreme Learning Machine Model for River Flow Forecasting: State-of-the-art, Practical Applications in Water Resource Engineering Area and Future Research Direction.” Journal of Hydrology 569 (569): 387–408. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.069.
   Google Scholar
• Yassine, B., R. Aicha, P. E. Namira, and L. Lorena. 2019. “Understanding the Effects of Soil Data Quality on SWAT Model Performance and Hydrological Processes in Tamedroust Watershed (Morocco).” Journal of African Earth Sciences 160. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar