Life cycle assessment framework for railway bridges: literature survey and critical issues

REFERENCES

• Althaus, H.J., Bauer, C., Doka, G., Dones, R., Frischknecht, R., Hellweg, S., …Humbert, S. (2010). Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods (No. 3, p. v2). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle inventories, ecoinvent report, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• ARMY TM 5-600 AIR FORCE AFJPAM 32-1088 (1994). Bridge inspection, maintenance, and repair., Technical manual No. 5-600, Headquarters Department of the Army and the Air Force, Washington. Retrieved from http://armypubs.army.mil/eng/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/tm5_600.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Barbara, N., Kellenberger, D., Alcorm, A., & Garrett, P. (2009). Life cycle inventory – review of data collection protocols. Report QT0776, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, H., & Tillman, A-M. (2001). The hitchhiker's guide to LCA: An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Botniabanan, A.B. (2010a). Environmental product declaration for the railway infrastructure on the Bothnia line. Reg. no. S-P-00196, UN CPC 53212. Retrieved from http://gryphon.environdec.com/data/files/6/7220/epd196.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Botniabanan, A.B. (2010b). Environmental product declaration for passenger transport on the Bothnia line. Reg. no. S-P-00194, UN CPC 6421, Retrieved from http://www.botniabanan.se/vitbokmiljo/dokument/5%202%208%20 EPD%20for%20passenger%20transport%20on%20the%20Bothnia%20Line.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Botniabanan, A.B. (2010c). Environmental product declaration for freight transport on the Bothnia line. Reg. no. S-P-00195, UN CPC 6512. Retrieved from http://www.botniabanan.se/vitbokmiljo/dokument/5%202%209%20EPD%20for%20freight%20transport%20on%20the%20Bothnia%20Line.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Botniabanan, A.B. (2010d). Environmental product declaration for railway bridges on the Bothnia line. Reg. no. S-P-00199, UN CPC 53212. Retrieved from http://gryphon.environdec.com/data/files/6/7219/epd199.pdf [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Bouhaya, L., Le Roy, R., & Feraille-Fresnet, A. (2009). Simplified environmental study on innovative bridge structure. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(6), 2066–2071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings, D. (2006). An environmental comparison of bridge forms. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Bridge Engineering, I59(BE4), 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, M.A., Notten, P., Chayer, J. A., & Cicas, G. (2006). Summary of global life cycle inventory data resources. Prepared for Task Force 1: Database registry SETAC/UNEP life cycle initiative. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/ordntrnt/ORD/NRMRL/std/lca/pdfs/summary_of_global_lci_data_resources.pdf [Accessed 27th Octoer 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Du, G., & Karoumi, R. (2012). Life cycle assessment of a railway bridge: Comparison of two superstructure designs. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 10.1080/15732479.2012.670250. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15732479.2012.670250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecoinvent database v2.2.(2006). Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, EMPA St. Gallen Lerchenfeldstrasse 5 CH-9014. St. Gallen.
   Google Scholar
• Europa Press Releases IP/11/372 (2011). Transport 2050: Commission outlines ambitious plan to increase mobility and reduce emissions, Brussels. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference = IP/11/372&format = HTML&aged = 0&language = en [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook – general guide for life cycle assessment – detailed Retrieved from http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf-directory/ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-DETAIL-online-12March2010.pdf [Accessed 16 June 2011].
   Google Scholar
• European Reference Life Cycle Data System (ELCD) Version 2.0 (2006). European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment, European Commission – DG Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Fava, J.A. (2011). SETAC and life cycle assessment: Parallel growth., Five Winds International, SETAC.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, M.D., & Reston, V.A. (1998). Iron and steel recycling in the United States in 1998., US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Open File Report 01-224, Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Road Administration (2001). Material quantity and cost estimation models for highway bridges. Helsinki: Finnish Road Administration (Unpublished, in Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Finnveden, G. (1999). Valuation methods within LCA-where are the values?The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2(3), 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gervásio, H., & Simões da Silva, L. (2008). Comparative life-cycle analysis of steel-concrete composite bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 4(4), 251–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossrieder, C. (2011). Life cycle assessment of future high-speed rail in Norway. Master thesis in Industrial Ecology, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Guinée, J.B. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7(5), 311–313.
   Google Scholar
• Hammervold, J., Reenaas, M., & Brattebø, H. (2009). Environmental effects-life cycle assessment of Bridges. SubProject 2 (SP2), ETSI Project (Stage 2), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A. (2009). Principles of using life-cycle assessment in bridge analysis. Proceedings of US-Japan Workshop on Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Infrastructure Materials, Sapporo, Japan, October 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Horvath, A., & Hendrickson, C.T. (1998). Steel vs steel-reinforced concrete bridges: Environmental assessment. Journal of Infrastructure Systems ASCE, 4(3), 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• IdeMat (2005). Design for sustainability program, Faculty of Design, Engineering and Production. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management – life-cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14044 (2006). Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh, Y., & Kitagawa, T. (2003). Using CO2 emission quantities in bridge lifecycle analysis. Engineering Structures, 25(5), 565–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh, Y., Wada, M., & Liu, C. (2005). Lifecycle environmental impact and cost analyses of steel bridge piers with seismic risk. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability Rome, Italy, 19–23 June, 2005, p. 273.
   Google Scholar
• Jönbrink, A.K., Wolf-Wats, C., Erison, M., Olsson, P., & Wallén, E. (2000). LCA software survey. IVL (Report No. B1390), Stockholm, Retrieved from www3.ivl.se/rapporter/pdf/B1390.pdf [Accessed 20 July 2011], Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Keoleian, G.A., Kendall, A., Dettling, J.E., Smith, V.M., Chandler, R.F., Lepech, M.D., & Li, V.C. (2005). Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: Comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints. Journal of Infrastructure Systems ASCE, 11(1), 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, A.E., & Theis, T.L. (2008). Comparison of life cycle impact assessment tools in the case of biofuels. 2008 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment May 19–21, 2008,San Francisco, CA. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, A., Olsen, S.I., & Hauschild, M.Z. (2011). Normalization in EDIP97 and EDIP2003: Updated European inventory for 2004 and guidance towards a consistent use in practice. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6(5), 401–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LCI of Portland cement concrete, PCA R&D Serial No. 3011. Portland Cement Association 2007. Retrieved from http://assets.ctlgroup.com/a4c9c83b-c381-4fda-baab-16cf64bbcde5.PDF [Accessed 20 July 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Lounis, Z., & Daigle, L. (2007). Environmental benefits of life cycle design of concrete bridges. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Life Cycle Management, Zurich, Switzerland, August 27–29 2007, 293, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A.J. (2004). Concrete bridges in sustainable development. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers: Engineering Sustainability, 157(4), 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (2005). U.S. Life-Cycle Inventory Database. The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.Golden, CO.
   Google Scholar
• SAIC (2006). Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice. Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Contract No. 68-C02-067, Work Assignment 3–15, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• SPINE@CPM – the operational prototype for industrial LCA databases. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.cpm.chalmers.se/CPMdatabase/Start.asp [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Steele, K.N.P., Cole, G., Parke, G., Clarke, B., & Harding, J. (2002). The application of life cycle assessment technique in the investigation of brick arch highway bridges. Proceedings of the Conference for the Engineering Doctorate in Environmental Technology. Retrieved from http://www.cintec.com/media/casestudies/9.1.4%20Case%20Studies/APPLICATION%20OF%20LIFE%20CYCLE%20ASSESSMENT.pdf [Accessed 20 July 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Steele, K., Cole, G., Parke, G., Clarke, B., & Harding, J. (2003). Highway bridges and environment: Sustainable perspectives. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 156(4), 176–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stranddorf, H.K., Hoffmann, L., & Schmidt, A. (2003). LCA guideline: Update on impact categories, normalisation and weighting in LCA. Selected EDIP97-data, DK-Teknik Energy and Environment Report. Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Stripple, H. (2001). Life cycle assessment of road – a pilot study for inventory analysis. Gothenburg: Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL).
   Google Scholar
• Thiebault, V. (2010). Design of railway bridges considering LCA. Master thesis TRITA-BKN 305, Division of Bridge and Steel Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• UIC (2009). Carbon footprint of high-speed railway infrastructure (pre-study) – methodology and application of high speed railway operation of European railways. Paris: International Union of Railways (UIC).
   Google Scholar
• Widman, J. (1998). Environmental impact assessment of steel bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 46(1), 291–293.
   Google Scholar
• World steel life cycle inventory (Former IISI), Rue Colonel Bourg, Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from http://www.worldsteel.org/ [Accessed 27 October 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Zygomalas, I., Efthymiou, E., Baniotopoulos, C., & Blok, R. (2012). A newly developed life cycle inventory (LCI) database for commonly used structural steel components. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(12), 1173–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar